Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,074–7,284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:37
7,098
-8
13 Sept 2026, 19:40
7,106
-16
10 Sept 2026, 00:37
7,122
-19
4 Sept 2026, 15:00
7,141
-14
1 Sept 2026, 04:44
7,155
-10
29 Aug 2026, 09:03
7,165
-8
26 Aug 2026, 10:53
7,173
-15
23 Aug 2026, 01:47
7,188
-4
19 Aug 2026, 11:15
7,192
-21
16 Aug 2026, 08:57
7,213
-23
13 Aug 2026, 03:19
7,236
-13
10 Aug 2026, 00:31
7,249
-10
7 Aug 2026, 09:28
7,259
-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:33
7,260
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 54 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
252 reactions across 52 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
39.3%
👍
62
24.6%
🔥
34
13.5%
😁
33
13.1%
😱
9
3.57%
😢
8
3.17%
🤔
5
1.98%
🕊
2
0.794%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 54 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mikybull_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
This is the biggest short squeeze in crypto history and the crazy part is there was no news or catalyst that could have pushed the price like this.
I’ve never seen anything like this and I’ve seen a lot shit since 2016.
So there are two possibilities:
1. Insiders know the Clarity Act is passing in September and loaded up aggressively, triggering liquidations.
2. A big entity used thin liquidity to push the price …
$BTC is finally showing the setup bulls have been waiting for.
Over the past 24 hours, $BTC surged toward $70K, while $ETH jumped toward $2,300.
The move triggered a massive short squeeze, with roughly $2B in short positions liquidated as the bears were wheeled into the emergency room.
The rally is being backed by several major bullish catalysts.
For the first time, the Clarity Act has a September 15 Senate proce…
THE CRYPTO CLARITY ACT IS COMING IN 2026
August 18: SEC proposed its first-ever rule to regulate crypto
August 19: President Trump will meet crypto officials to push the Clarity Act
August 20: CFTC to host a meeting on crypto regulations
September 15: Senator Lummis confirmed the Clarity Act vote
The White House will host a major crypto summit today, bringing together President Trump, SEC and CFTC officials, alongside leading crypto and financial executives.
Also today, the FOMC Meeting Minutes will be released. Markets will look for clues on the Fed’s next rate move and its inflation outlook.
The SEC has proposed new crypto rules aimed at creating a clearer regulatory framework, including exemptions for ce…
US-Iran tensions are heating up again. Tehran is preparing for a potentially wider confrontation, while Trump has issued fresh threats over the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran has warned of further escalation if Washington fails to reach an interim deal within weeks. With Hormuz already disrupted, the risk of a broader regional conflict is rising.
Oil markets are reacting. Brent crude pushed above $91 as fading hopes of a U…
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @mikybull_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Gem 💎 @cryptogem · 109,074 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MikybullCrypto” (@mikybull_crypto), 7,098 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikybull_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.