Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Milan Krizanek

Channel

Milan Krizanek

@milankrizanek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

588subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002007910545
TypeChannel
Username@milankrizanek
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/milankrizanek

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

588593590.57 August 2026 — 593 subscribers7 August 2026 — 593 subscribers15 August 2026 — 591 subscribers24 August 2026 — 588 subscribers7 September 2026 — 589 subscribers14 September 2026 — 588 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 587–594 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 15:40588-1
7 Sept 2026, 20:19589+1
24 Aug 2026, 09:04588-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:56591-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:17593no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:03593first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 15 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
857.1%
👏214.3%
👍17.14%
👎17.14%
🤔17.14%
🥰17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Dec 2025, 11:53 UTC616 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Heimlich erstellte Tonaufnahmen einer geheimen Gerichtsberatung - Gericht lacht über "Schwurbler" Eine Zürcher Richterin lacht über "Schwurbler" und seinen Anwalt... Teaser-Video: https://t.me/milankrizanek/187 (Weiterhin aktuell, bitte weiterhin teilen & verbreiten.) Eine fragwürdige Kündigung im Zusammenhang mit Corona, und heimlich erstellte Tonaufnahmen der geheimen und ebenso fragwürdigen Gerichtsberatung. Di

4

29 Dec 2025, 11:40 UTC396 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Teaser-Video: Heimlich erstellte Tonaufnahmen einer geheimen Gerichtsberatung - Gericht lacht über "Schwurbler" Eine Zürcher Richterin lacht über "Schwurbler" und seinen Anwalt... (Weiterhin aktuell, bitte weiterhin teilen & verbreiten.) Eine fragwürdige Kündigung im Zusammenhang mit Corona, und heimlich erstellte Tonaufnahmen der geheimen und ebenso fragwürdigen Gerichtsberatung. Die Tonaufnahmen belegen, wie die

4👏2🥰1

21 Dec 2025, 14:55 UTC539 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

- Was the Cold War a lie? - Did East and West secretly cooperate? - Was the threat of nuclear war ever real? - Was WWII a tool for technological transformation? X/Twitter: https://x.com/milankrizanek/status/2002098020377379140 (EN) All videos available in 3 languages (EN, DE, SK) / Youtube Playlists: (EN): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZWIhT5BhOL2-W5h7RsjA0Pm3xCmj9ELH (DE): https://www.youtube.com/playl

🤔1

21 Dec 2025, 14:48 UTC≈5,500 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

-War der Kalte Krieg ein Betrug? -Haben Ost und West heimlich kooperiert? -Bestand die Gefahr eines Atomkriegs wirklich? -War der Zweite Weltkrieg ein Werkzeug für Technologiewandel? X/Twitter: https://x.com/milankrizanek/status/2002097428518887894 (DE) Alle Videos in 3 Sprachen verfügbar (EN, DE, SK)/ Youtube Playlists: (EN): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZWIhT5BhOL2-W5h7RsjA0Pm3xCmj9ELH (DE): https://ww

21 Dec 2025, 14:38 UTC476 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

-Bola studená vojna podvod? -Spolupracovali Východ a Západ potajomky? -Hrozila jadrová vojna naozaj? -Bola 2. svetová vojna nástrojom technologickej transformácie? X/Twitter: https://x.com/milankrizanek/status/2002096155023331814 Všetky videá dostupné v 3 jazykoch (EN, DE, SK)/ YouTube playlist: (EN): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZWIhT5BhOL2-W5h7RsjA0Pm3xCmj9ELH (DE): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis

15 Sept 2025, 15:01 UTC788 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Bola studená vojna podvod? Spolupracovali Východ a Západ potajomky? Hrozila jadrová vojna naozaj? Bola 2. svetová vojna nástrojom technologickej transformácie? 9-minútové intro 🎬 Celý 2h film v ďalšom príspevku.

👍1👎1

15 Sept 2025, 14:54 UTC720 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Was the Cold War a lie? Did East and West secretly cooperate? Was the threat of nuclear war real? Was WWII a tool for technological transformation? 9-minute intro 🎬 Full 2h documentary in the next post.

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @milankrizanek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aya Velázquez
@ayawasgeht · 21,716
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Milan Krizanek” (@milankrizanek), 588 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milankrizanek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.