Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐— ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป.

Channel

๐— ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป.

@miless1kk

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

474subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677673503
TypeChannel
Username@miless1kk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/miless1kk

Growth

474487480.57 August 2026 โ€” 485 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 485 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 487 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 486 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 484 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 477 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 474 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 472โ€“489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:57474-3
7 Sept 2026, 09:00477-7
28 Aug 2026, 19:14484-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:05486-1
15 Aug 2026, 04:56487+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:24485no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00485first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 52921282983341898213935.8%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3229.4%
๐Ÿ’‹1917.4%
customย 525833148844477215587.34%
customย 541141192253482398676.42%
๐Ÿ’˜43.67%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC239 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ ะกะžะขะ ะฃะ”ะะ˜ะงะ•ะกะขะ’ะž ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

customย 52583314884447721556customย 52921282983341898215customย 54114119225348239865โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

31 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC128 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ะŸั€ะตะดะทะฐะบะฐะท ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ะพะฒ ะฝะฐ ั… ะบะพัั‚ัŽะผ, ัะดะตะปะฐัŽ ัะตะณะพะดะฝั โ˜บ๏ธ โžก๏ธะŸะธัะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK

customย 52583314884447721552customย 52921282983341898212customย 54114119225348239862โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

12 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC176 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ ะกะžะขะ ะฃะ”ะะ˜ะงะ•ะกะขะ’ะž ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

customย 52921282983341898217โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’˜4

12 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC147 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8customย 52921282983341898215๐Ÿ’‹4

10 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC281 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ ะกะžะขะ ะฃะ”ะะ˜ะงะ•ะกะขะ’ะž ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

customย 52921282983341898216โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ’‹4

6 Jul 2026, 05:33 UTC365 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฐะฒะฐ #ะปะพะณะพั‚ะธะฟ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

customย 52921282983341898218โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ’‹7

3 Jul 2026, 04:39 UTC331 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿพ ะ—ะฐะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ: @MILESSIK #ะฑะฐะฝะฝะตั€ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐๐‘๐ˆ๐‚๐„ ๐ŸŽ„ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐Ž๐‘๐Œ๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ ๐Ÿ˜Š ๐๐Ž๐‘๐“๐…๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ๐Ž ๐Ÿคฉ BEST UC BOT 24/7

customย 52921282983341898216โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ’‹4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @miless1kk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐— ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป.โ€ (@miless1kk), 474 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miless1kk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.