До конца августа буду ложить брелочек в подарок
custom 52943463568847999522custom 52939907937222361891

Channel
@milkashopwel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
518subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003146380963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @milkashopwel |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/milkashopwel |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 518 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 525 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 534 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 544 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 557 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 545 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 547 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5292015027161687712 | 18 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5294074150447513870 | 11 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5294346356884799952 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5293990793722236189 | 7 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5292130583256787420 | 5 | 9.26% | |
| custom 5294327605057584109 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5294351068463921313 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5291916766899889246 | 1 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
До конца августа буду ложить брелочек в подарок
custom 52943463568847999522custom 52939907937222361891
Ещё в наличии осталось Ожерелье Брелочек котик Браслетик неопалитан Гача тоторо
custom 52939907937222361891custom 52943463568847999521
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ๑๑ 、🤩 ₊ 🤩 る 🤩🤩 ⋂⋂ Цены на фото Писать @Milkawel
custom 52940741504475138708custom 52921305832567874201custom 52939907937222361891
Напоминаю, я делаю рекламу
custom 52920150271616877123custom 52939907937222361892custom 52921305832567874201custom 52943276050575841091custom 52943510684639213131
Скоро появится наличие, а также выйдут мегаскидки)
custom 52943463568847999524custom 52921305832567874201custom 52939907937222361891custom 52943276050575841091custom 52943510684639213131
Напоминаю)
Результаты этого розыгрыша Поздравляю всех победителей!
custom 52920150271616877123custom 52943463568847999521
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Зайка🪽 (@Aeks_mixsi) 2. L (@Inyunm) 3. Мария 4. Анита (@Anita45091) 5. Чай (@TeaWithKoniak) 6. КС3Н1Я (@Dkowboy) ✔️Проверить результаты
Поздравляю победителей!
custom 52939907937222361891
Результаты розыгрыша: Победители: 1. Бежевый Папочка (🦐) [🌹] Степан (6628176496) 2. ∞🌞Cherry lotus 🪷𓂀 (5010408577) 3. 𓆩 𝑫𝒓𝒂𝒘𝒆𝒏𝒂 𓆪 (5126494919) 4. typik (5609761876) 5. Жабка (7685946544)
Напоминаю
Я так поняла, никому ничего не понравилось. Я сама вас спрашивала, как будем выбирать работы: голосованием или я сама их выберу. Выбрали, чтобы я сама выбрала. Я их выбрала, и всё же меня опять же засрали, говоря, что я слепая. Может, я и не увидела, что работа сделана ИИ...
custom 52920150271616877124custom 52919167668998892461
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @milkashopwel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.ׁ ִ𝅄𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓴𝓪.𝓼𝓱𝓸𝓹ׁ 𝅄 .” (@milkashopwel), 518 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milkashopwel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.