4 measurements spanning 15 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 179–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:48
179
-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:34
180
+1
8 Aug 2026, 13:16
179
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:20
179
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
144 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
60
41.7%
👍
34
23.6%
🔥
25
17.4%
❤
12
8.33%
🙈
10
6.94%
💩
3
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2023 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @milordtalks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 December 2023 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
И вот опять, пытаемся пережить 2027 (на самом деле уже 2030).
Помните AI 2027 — сценарий, в котором ИИ начинает автоматизировать разработку следующих поколений ИИ, после чего прогресс резко ускоряется?
Теперь тот же AI Futures Project выпустил AI 2040: Plan A. Это уже не столько прогноз, сколько план действий.
Предложение примерно такое:
— США и Китай договариваются не превращать создание сверхинтеллекта в гонку …
Немного интересных мыслей про AI-стартапы. Когда-нибудь мы начнем делать все умом, а не пытаться забраться на гору хайпа. Рекомендую ознакомиться.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/1026726/
Немного о том, что ждет нас в ближайшем будущем(помимо бесконечного нейрослопа).
То о чем мы еще 10 лет назад говорили "нукогдатотам", а безопасники надеялись что это произойдет не на их веку.
Возможно еще не пора брать техдолг, но формировать верхнеуровневые планы безусловно стоит. А для инженеров принимать новые стандарты, и начинать изучать так называемую "PQC", она же "постквантовая криптография". В целом первы…
Давайте немного подумаем, о том что нас ждёт дальше. Интереснейшая статья на мой взгляд, которая показывает основные проблемы инженера 21 века
https://habr.com/ru/articles/991614/
Файлы Эпштейна? Нет, спасибо — тут кто-то ебанутый скачал всю музыку из Spotify и сохранил в торрент файл на почти 300 терабайт!
При этом, они еще и провели отличный анализ данных, потому внутри можно увидеть много интересных выводов и графиков 😎
Наткнулся на интересную статью
Исследую роутеры с «вечным VPN» с российских маркетплейсов
Занимательное чтиво, но мне грустно, что это все покупается. На подобном строится бизнес и никто не объясняет людям, что они теряют. Очень надеюсь, что люди далекие от технологий, научатся обсуждать темы связанные с покупкой сомнительных вещей хотя-бы с чатжпт.
А пока читаем и наслаждаемся "безопасностью" в чистом виде. Беру …
Итак, пост про языковые модели локально. Давно уже хотел написать, и кажется пора. Саша привет этот пост в том числе для тебя🙂
Для начала моя спецификация, это MacBook Pro на чипе M1Pro и 32 оперативы. ОС Sequoia 15.5.
Для начала предлагаю ознакомиться с гайдом Мануал по запуску полной модели DeepSeek-R1 локально и понять, что в целом серьезные языковые модели это уже не так дорого. Цена оборудования примерно 6к$.
…
Современные проблемы требуют современных решений. Рекомендую ознакомиться с одним из таких решений. SOSAL пытается заполнить недостающие части мозаики, филигранно вписываясь своими принципами между KISS, AGILE, и прочими титанами ниши 🙂
https://habr.com/ru/articles/914998/
😁11🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @milordtalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Милорд DevOps” (@milordtalks), 179 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milordtalks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.