Channel
@milvachumba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
261subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002086440186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @milvachumba |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/milvachumba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 261 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 263 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 263 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 47.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 22.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 8.41% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 3.74% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 3.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 29 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как думаете, где остальные куклы?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3❤1
Типа незаметно повыебывалась электрокамином😃😃😃
❤7😎3
Она не выбирала любимчиков💅
🔥10
*состоялся переезд
👍3🔥1
Кукла и Копа(тыч)😊
❤10
Уже неделю как получила приз от viacrtr. Хоть уже не коллекционирую ршх, но эта кукла для меня буквально открытие. Почему? Когда собирала ршх, Берри была "моей нет" в коллекции. Казалась жутко непривлекательной. Но сейчас я смотрю и чот кайфую с нее жоска😍. А еще эта Ханни Свомп, надо было в том самом мэме использовать Берри... ужасное упущение(нет😊). Спасибо большое за бесплатные розыгрыши!❤️
❤10
😊
👍3
Смотри, что есть на AliExpress! Fradoo 11 дюймов кукла Эльф 1/6 за 431 ₽ - уже со скидкой -23% https://sl.aliexpress.ru/p?key=zZ5GVXr
👍3
Та самая легендарная кукла, про которую я говорила в посте. Я уже закончила с рестайлом другой чукчи(покажу завтра, надеюсь) и планирую перепрошить ее в черний😋 По поводу других фоток я вас наебала, ничего сегодня не будет, ненавижу(вообще люблю) работу...
❤6🔥4
Нафоткала и ничего не выложила... сегодня постараюс😊
💅4
Кандибобер Ибрагим Копатыч 🙏🙏
🤣7🔥1
Ребят, ну тут без вариантов победил кандибобер🤣
🏆8🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @milvachumba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, где остальные куклы?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Имя Ибрагим- официальное, а домашнюю кличка-
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 29 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Куклы и приколы😎🤡” (@milvachumba), 261 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/milvachumba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.