Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI

Channel

Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI

@mindcontrolmonarchmkultra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,180subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440310658
TypeChannel
Username@mindcontrolmonarchmkultra
Created17 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mindcontrolmonarchmkultra

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1802,1942,1876 August 2026 — 2,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,194 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,184 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,189 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,185 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,190 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,184 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,184 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,182 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,180 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 37 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,178–2,196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 03:362,180-2
9 Sept 2026, 11:172,182-2
3 Sept 2026, 23:382,184+1
31 Aug 2026, 12:072,183-1
28 Aug 2026, 09:422,184-6
25 Aug 2026, 15:562,190+5
16 Aug 2026, 17:282,185-4
13 Aug 2026, 12:152,189+5
10 Aug 2026, 03:402,184-10
7 Aug 2026, 07:102,194+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:172,193first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯133.3%
😭133.3%
🤮133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026

But science is so corrupt no one can tell which version is the truth Grok No. The account in that post is the original 1973 narrative from David Rosenhan’s Science paper “On Being Sane in Insane Places.” It is not accurate. The study claimed eight healthy “pseudopatients” (a painter, housewife, pediatrician, graduate student, and others) presented only with hearing the words “empty,” “hollow,” and “thud,” were admit

7 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026

Confidence level: high. The archival discrepancies, missing subjects, selective exclusion of contradictory data, and Scull’s formal assessment of scientific fraud are documented across multiple independent sources (Cahalan’s primary research, Scull’s peer-reviewed analysis, and subsequent coverage in scientific and historical outlets). No credible counter-evidence restoring the full accuracy of the published study ha

7 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026

This is disputed it should be said... who knows what the truth is? Was it disputed legitimitely or because it raised a uncomfortable truth? In 1973, eight perfectly healthy people walked into different psychiatric hospitals across the United States. They were not ill. Yet no one inside those walls was able to see it. It was an experiment. One of the most disturbing experiments in the history of psychiatry. Designed

6 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC69 viewsread 7 August 2026

“The Digital Ritual of Blood Baptism” Ariana Grande x Katy Perry x Hilton x Carrie https://x.com/TheRealDoenut/status/2085202216076689409

6 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC90 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Is he saying he does deliverances? I think it is much more complex than he is trying to make it appear. It seems more like virtue signalling. "I’ve seen it personally. Dealt with one deliverance last year. He’s a good man, but the demon wouldn’t come out. I finally asked him if he held onto any unforgiveness. He knew immediately he did. So, we worked through it. He forgave the one who had wronged him horribly and

6 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026

Journaling as a Tool For Healing https://veronicaswiftblog.substack.com/p/journaling-as-a-tool-for-healing

6 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC221 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

8 years ago today, I posted this - For years after, I probably got most kickback from my two posts about Billy Graham , and my mormon abuse posts. Its mostly gone away now. Billy Graham – Pedophile, Illuminati, Luciferian and Monarch Slave Programmer https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2018/08/06/billy-graham-pedophile-illuminati-luciferian-and-monarch-slave-programmer/

💯1🤮1

6 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026

Excerpt from Handout for Presenter/Fronter Programming https://svalispeaksagain.wordpress.com/2026/08/05/excerpt-from-handout-for-presenter-fronter-programming/

6 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC86 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wolfchannel2

GB News Cambridge professor RESIGNS after investigation launched into accusations of plagiarism https://www.gbnews.com/news/jason-arday-resigns-university-cambridge-plagiarism-row

6 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wolfchannel2Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @mindcontrolmonarchmkultra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI” (@mindcontrolmonarchmkultra), 2,180 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mindcontrolmonarchmkultra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.