Рандом кто кинет заявку в Приват получит подарок

Channel
Kim Minjeong
@minjeong
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
162subscribers
-8,970 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002438141360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @formnjeong @minjeong |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minjeong |
Topic
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:41 | 162 | +149 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:15 | 13 | -87 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 100 | +98 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 2 | -9,433 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 9,435 | -186 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 9,621 | +9,560 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 61 | -9,918 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 9,979 | -9 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:54 | 9,988 | -19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 10,007 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 10,020 | -12 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 10,032 | -7 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 10,039 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 10,056 | -16 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 10,072 | -5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 10,077 | +34 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 10,043 | -50 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 10,093 | +86 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 10,007 | -41 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 10,048 | first reading |
Engagement
167 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 167 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 11s
- Average length
- 1m 12s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 278
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 33
- of 167 we hold a reading for · 20%
- Most on one post
- 100
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minjeong. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 167 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Лота на 💝🧸 Подписку на @ahyeonsetter
Photo, posted without a caption
260828 @.민정 Bubble Update
Лота на 💝🧸 Подписку на @ahyeonsetter
260828 @.민정 Bubble Update
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
260828 @.aespa_official X Update
260828 @.민정 Bubble Update
Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @minjeong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 10 posts on @minjeong as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 18 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@aesstick · 2006 postsD
@TrueNingning · 13 postsО
@byexningning · 13 postsNINGNING
@ningreally · 3,7133 postsFemininomenon
@Fem1nn · 982 postsLullaway 🔒🔒
@LullaDream · 2682 postsPark Minju
@M8nj7 · 2792 postsYeonjun Choi
@MadeYeonjun · 3302 postsхелп от астата @🔥
@astat_help · 9,4972 postsarzurx
@augustmaybe · 22 postsAzemilote
@az3milote · 22 postsJang Wonyoung
@forjangswony · 542 postsJeong Ian
@jeongex · 1,0032 postsroha - chan
@r0ha_chan · 4622 posts.
@FrostLina1 · 91 post桜 * 𝓟etalie 𐙚
@Ptalies · 2141 postШоп
@SagynovasShop · 591 postTHE MONSTER STARS
@TheMonsterStars · 1,7081 post* Āeri V’aмp!rshh РП
@TrueAeriKnn · 1051 post보은 Boeun
@TrueBoeunPark · 1411 postAn Yujin
@TrueYujin_An · 2361 postrumor billlie community
@billlielisten · 1261 post@ 𝕯AISY : port
@daisyport · 2031 post.
@imuwin · 11 postNingning
@ningninguo · 2,7161 postSakai Moka
@shinryujinreally · 1,7981 post.
@stellasym · 21 post_0828
@sweetiemai · 1361 post.
@temsmonica · 11 post天使 paradise kiss
@yuyhn · 1,1861 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 20 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@virtnomeraottei · 7,6323 postsLezgin
@Hdaze0 · 3,9472 postsPark Hoon
@ParkHoonOnly · 2882 postsЭспа км пиздят
@aespadiscuss2 · 2,2781 postDahyunny ꩜ world、꞉김다현
@dahyunnyworld · 1061 postGronera
@damzed0 · 6261 post김영주 aeri
@gisellexae · 4231 postKim Minjeong
@imwinter · 8,2261 postвонен
@jangxwonyn · 21 postксан фмл
@ksan_ovskie · 5,1911 post᭝ ᨳ 𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚜𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚜
@meisouls · 71 post@Minjeong
@minjeonfg · 31 postWinthepooh (From The Vault)
@PoohVault · 21 postПрайс миджу
@PricefrMiju · 321 postRexona Closed
@RexonaFm · 31 post️ ️ ️
@saidering · 221 postShakall
@shklllr · 5,1651 postИщи друзей сп от
@soodossa · 5681 postJulik's wowr qweo
@TrueJulik · 7991 postDVATSAT7
@TXENTY7 · 3871 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@TrueKitsch · 1,0514 postsJeong Ian
@jeongex · 1,0033 postsAhyeon
@ahyeonsetter · 3202 posts홍 EUNCHAE
@arch_hhhe · 202 postsхелп от астата @🔥
@astat_help · 9,4972 postsAzemilote
@az3milote · 22 posts.
@FrostLina1 · 92 posts.
@imuwin · 12 postsJang Wonyoung
@imwonyme · 1,6362 postsPark Hoon
@ParkHoonOnly · 2882 postsSeohee06
@seohee06 · 22 postsNingbao
@theningbao · 2,3712 postsЫ
@TheWonhee · 12 postsflowerwony1
@FlowerWony1 · 11 post好’ 𝗛𝗔𝗢𝗥𝗜 𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 {🪼}
@haori_port · 3161 posthyukalog
@hyukalog · 9981 postChoi Soobin
@ImTrueSoobin · 3,1701 postвонен
@jangxwonyn · 21 postjennierubyjane
@jn1ruby · 5,3501 postPetalie Material
@MaterialPetalie · 1031 post.
@Reallygfian · 21 postШоп
@SagynovasShop · 591 post.
@temsmonica · 11 postDVATSAT7
@TXENTY7 · 3871 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 13
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 13
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@minjeong named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 27 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026 · confirmed gone 7 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026 · confirmed gone 28 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 20 August 2026 – 20 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kim Minjeong” (@minjeong), 162 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minjeong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.