μλ²½ν λ§μ€ν°ν΄λμ€ π€― #XAUUSD TP1 λ¬μ±, +30ν β TP2 λ¬μ±, +80ν β TP3 λ¬μ±, +160ν β μ΅λ λͺ©νμΉ λͺ¨λ λ¬μ±. μμ΅ νμ
β€4π3π₯1

Channel
@minjun_fpt
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
15,526subscribers
-6,591 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001995828516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minjun_fpt |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minjun_fpt |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 15,526 | -470 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 15,996 | -142 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 16,138 | -135 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 16,273 | -126 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 16,399 | -127 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 16,526 | -212 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 16,738 | -177 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 16,915 | -71 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 16,986 | -73 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 17,059 | -68 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 17,127 | -79 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 17,206 | -53 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 17,259 | -68 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 17,327 | -59 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 17,386 | -2,316 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 19,702 | -1,961 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 21,663 | -27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 21,690 | -32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 21,722 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 21,733 | first reading |
471 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 471 (7 August 2026 β 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 95,964 |
| Reactions total | 758 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
8,124 reactions across 468 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 2,738 | 33.7% | |
| β€ | 2,662 | 32.8% | |
| π₯ | 2,486 | 30.6% | |
| π₯° | 135 | 1.66% | |
| π | 89 | 1.10% | |
| π€ | 4 | 0.049% | |
| π | 3 | 0.037% | |
| π | 3 | 0.037% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 0.012% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 0.012% | |
| πΎ | 1 | 0.012% | |
| π | 1 | 0.012% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 468 of the 471 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8,124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 471 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
μλ²½ν λ§μ€ν°ν΄λμ€ π€― #XAUUSD TP1 λ¬μ±, +30ν β TP2 λ¬μ±, +80ν β TP3 λ¬μ±, +160ν β μ΅λ λͺ©νμΉ λͺ¨λ λ¬μ±. μμ΅ νμ
β€4π3π₯1
Voice message, posted without a caption
π9β€4
ννΈ, λ¬΄λ£ VIPμμλ μ°λ¦¬λ μ΄μ΅μ μ°½μΆνκ³ μμ΅λλ€ - TP1, TP2, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ TP3λ₯Ό ν격νλ©° β€οΈβπ₯ μ°λ¦¬λ λͺ¨λ μμ₯ μμ§μμ λΆμκ³Ό λͺ νν μ§μ λ° μ²μ° μμ€κ³Ό ν¨κ» ν©λλ€ λͺ¨λ μΈν μ μ 격μμ μ¬κ²©μ²λΌ λͺ μ€ν©λλ€ μ λ΅μ? μκ³μ²λΌ μ ννκ² μλνλ©° λ λ§λ€ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μΈμν©λλ€ κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ κ²°κ³Όλ μμ μ μΈ μ΄μ΅μ λλ€. TP μ΄ν TP, λͺ¨λ©ν μ νμ€μ λλ€. β‘οΈ λ³΅μ¬, λΆμ¬λ£κΈ° & μμ΅
β€5π₯4π2
ππ€£π₯²βΊοΈππ β 2026λ 9μ 3μΌ π μ£Όμ κ²½μ νμ΄λΌμ΄νΈ β’ BOJ κΈλ¦¬ μΈμ κΈ°λκ°μΌλ‘ μν κΈλ± μΌλ³Έ μ€μμν(μΌλ³Έμν) μ μ± μμ νμΉ΄ν νμ§λ©κ° μΈνλ μ΄μ μ΅μ λ₯Ό μν 민첩ν κΈλ¦¬ μΈμμ μꡬν ν, μνκ° λ―Έκ΅ λ¬λ¬λΉ μ½ 157.55μ**μΌλ‘ κ±°μ ν λ¬ λ§μ μ΅κ³ μμ€κΉμ§ κ°μΈλ₯Ό 보μμ΅λλ€. μμ₯μ νμ¬ 9μ BOJ κΈλ¦¬ μΈμμ κ±°μ μμ ν λ°μνκ³ μμ΄ USD/JPYμ μΆκ° νλ½ μλ ₯μ κ°νκ³ μμ΅λλ€. β’ λ―Έκ΅ κ³ μ© μ§ν λ°ν μ , μ¬μ ν λμ FRB κΈλ¦¬ μΈμ κΈ°λ λ―Έκ΅ λ―Όκ°κ³ μ© μμΉκ° μ½ν λ°μλ λΆκ΅¬νκ³ , μμ₯μ νμ¬ 9μ FRB κΈ°μ€κΈλ¦¬ 0.25%p μΈμ κ°λ₯μ±μ μ½ 62%**λ‘ λ³΄κ³ μμΌλ©°, μ΄λ μΌμ£ΌμΌ μ 37%μμ ν¬κ² μμΉν μμ€μ λλ€. κ΄μ¬μ 9μ 15~16μΌ FRB νμμ λν κΈ°λλ₯Ό ν¬κ² λ°κΏ μβ¦
π12π₯2β€1π1π₯°1
Voice message, posted without a caption
π₯7π3β€2π1π₯°1
πΌ μ μ μλ‘ μ€ν¬λ‘€ν΄ 보μΈμβ¦ μ€λμ κ²°κ³Όκ° λͺ¨λ κ²μ λ§ν΄μ€λλ€. κ°λ¨ν κ³Όμ : μ κ° λΆμν©λλ€ β μ¬λ¬λΆμ λ°λΌμ€μΈμ κ²½νμ΄ νμ μμ΅λλ€. νλλ§ νλ©΄ λ©λλ€ βΌοΈ
π6β€5π₯4
π₯ VIP ROOM - μΌκ° μκ·Έλ ν΅κ³ π2026λ 9μ 2μΌ μ€λ κΈμ TP3μ λ€ λ² λλ¬νμκ³ , NZDJPY νμ΄λ νμ₯ λͺ©νμ λλ¬νμΌλ©°, BTCλ μμ΅μΌλ‘ λ§κ°νμ΅λλ€. 1) #GBPAUD Buy @ 1.89215 SL -35ν 2) #XAUUSD Sell @ 4302 TP1 +30ν TP2 +80ν TP3 +160ν 3) #XAUUSD Buy @ 4291 TP1 +30ν TP2 +80ν TP3 +160ν 4) #NZDJPY Sell @ 95.015 TP3 +99ν 5) #XAUUSD Buy @ 4306 TP1 +30ν TP2 +80ν TP3 +160ν 6) #XAUUSD Buy @ 4308 TP1 +30ν TP2 +80ν TP3 +160ν 7) #CHFJPY Buy @ 197.335 SL -35ν 8) #XAUUSβ¦
π7β€4π₯4π₯°1
β€οΈβπ₯ λͺ¨λ μ’ λͺ©μμ κ°λ ₯ν μΈμ μ 보μμ΅λλ€! μ€λ λ€ μ°¨λ‘μ λ³λ κΈ κ±°λκ° λͺ¨λ λͺ©ν μμ€μ λλ¬νμΌλ©°, μμΈ‘μ μ€μ μ΄ μλ²½νκ² μ€νλμμ΅λλ€. NZDJPYμ BTC λν μλΉν κΈ°μ¬λ₯Ό νμ΅λλ€. VIP λ£Έμ μ νΈ ν΅κ³λ μλμ κ°μ΅λλ€ ππ»
β€10π₯3π1
λ―Όμ€ x PuPrime 곡μ ννΈλ μ¬λ¬λΆ, μμ£Ό μ κ° μ΄λ€ λΈλ‘컀μ μΌνλμ§ λ¬Όμ΄λ³΄μλκ΅°μ. μμ₯μμ 8λ λμ μΌνλ©΄μ κΈ°μ΅λμ§ μμ μ λλ‘ λ§μ λΈλ‘컀λ₯Ό ν μ€νΈν΄λ΄€μ΅λλ€. λͺ¨λ μμ μ±μ μ½μνμ§λ§, μ€μ λ‘λ κ±°μ νμ λμμ μ°Ύκ² λ§λλ μΈλΆ μ¬νλ€μ΄ μμμ΅λλ€. κ·Έλμ μ λ PuPrimeμ μ ννμ΅λλ€ β μ¬κΈ°μλ λͺ¨λ κ²μ΄ μ μ리μ μμ΅λλ€: - μ¦κ°μ μΈ μ£Όλ¬Έ 체결, μΉ΄νΌ νΈλ μ΄λ©, λ€μν 보λμ€ - λ¬Έμ μλ 24/7 μΆκΈ μλΉμ€ - AFSA, FSC, FSCAμ 곡μ κ·μ - ν¬λͺ ν μ½κ΄κ³Ό μ§μμ μΈ μ§μ λ―Ώμ μ μλ λΈλ‘컀μ ν¨κ» μΌνλ©΄μ, μ λ μ νΈλ μ΄λλ€μ΄ μ κ° λ리λ κ²κ³Ό λμΌν μμ€μ μμ μ±μ λ°μ μ μλλ‘ νμ ν μ μμ΅λλ€. μ μΆμ² λ§ν¬λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ PuPrime λΈλ‘컀 κ³μ μ λ±λ‘νμκ³ , λΉλ° λ©μμ§λ‘ μ½λβ¦
β€6π5
π₯ μ°μ μμ€ ν ν΄μΌ ν μΌ: ν볡과 μ§μ€ μ΄λ€ νΈλ μ΄λλΌλ κ²ͺλ μν©μ λλ€. μ°μμΌλ‘ μμ€μ 보λ κ±°λκ° μ΄μ΄μ§λ©΄, 곡ν¬μ¬κ³Ό μμ¬μ΄ μκΈ°κ³ "λ¬΄μ¨ μλ₯Ό μ¨μλΌλ λ§νν΄μΌκ² λ€"λ μκ°μ΄ λ€κΈ° λ§λ ¨μ λλ€. μ°μ μμ€μ κ²°μ½ μ΅μ’ νλ¨μ΄ μλλλ€. μ΄λ κ±°λμ μΌλΆμ λλ€. νμ§λ§ μ΄μ μ΄λ»κ² λ°μνλλκ° λΉμ μ΄ μ΄ κ²μμ κ³μ λ¨μμμ μ μλμ§λ₯Ό κ²°μ ν©λλ€. β‘οΈ ν볡μ μν μ§μΉ¨: 1) λ©μΆμμμ€ "κ°μ μ νλλ €" λ€μ κ±°λλ₯Ό μμνμ§ λ§μμμ€. 24μκ°μ΄λΌλ ν΄μμ μ·¨νλ κ²μ΄ λΉμ μ μμκΈμ μ§ν¬ μ μμ΅λλ€. 2) λΉμ μ κ³νμ λ€μ νμΈνμμμ€ - λΉμ μ μμ€ν μ λ°λΌ κ±°λνμ΅λκΉ? - μμΉμ μ§μΌμ‘μ΅λκΉ? - μλλ©΄ μμ₯μ μ‘μμ νλ리거λ, μ‘°κΈν¨μ, νΉμ μμ₯μ 무μΈκ°λ₯Ό μ¦λͺ νλ €λ μμ¬μ΄ μμμ΅λκΉ? 3) λΆμνμμμ€β¦
π6β€5π₯2π₯°1
λλ‘ κ°μ₯ μ€μν ν΅μ°°μ κ°μ₯ νλ λ λ€ μ΄νμ νμν©λλ€. μ§κΈ μλ°κ°μ λλΌκ³ κ³μ λ€λ©΄ β λ€μ κΈμ μ¬λ¬λΆμ μν κ²μ λλ€. μ°¨λΆνκ² μ½μ΄λ³΄μΈμ. μ¬λ¬λΆμ΄ νμλ‘ νλ λ§μ μ νν λ΄κ³ μμμ§λ λͺ¨λ¦ λλ€ β€οΈ
π6β€5π₯2
#TradeClosed, -120ν μμ€μ λλ€ π μ΄λ¬ν κ²°κ³Όμ λν΄ μ§μ¬μΌλ‘ μ¬κ³Όλ립λλ€. κ±°λμμλ λͺ¨λ μ€μ μ΄ μμλλ‘ μλνμ§ μμΌλ©°, νΉν λ³λμ±μ΄ λμ κΈ°κ°μλ λμ± κ·Έλ μ΅λλ€. μμ€μ κ±°λ κ³Όμ μ μ μμ μΈ λΆλΆμ΄λ―λ‘, νμ μν κ΄λ¦¬κ° μ΅μ°μ μ λλ€ πͺπ» μ§μ€λ ₯κ³Ό μ μ λ ₯μ μ μ§νλ©°, μμ κ°μ κ°μ§μκΈ° λ°λλλ€
π₯6β€3π3
Showing the 12 most recent of 471 posts we hold for @minjun_fpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
μ¬λ¬λΆμ μ€λ μ ν¬μ ν¨κ» μΌλ§λ₯Ό λ²μμ΅λκΉ, VIP μ¬λ¬λΆ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
πΈ μ΅κ·Ό λ©°μΉ λμ μ μ ν¨κ»ν κ±°λ κ²°κ³Όλ‘ μΌλ§λ μμ΅μ μ»μΌμ ¨λμ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
μ΄λ² μ£Ό μ μ ν¨κ» μΌλ§λ₯Ό λ²μμ΅λκΉ?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 471 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMinjun / Fx Profit Traders π°π·β (@minjun_fpt), 15,526 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minjun_fpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.