𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓻𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓵𝓪𝔂 🐇 pinned a photo

Channel
𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓻𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓵𝓪𝔂 🐇
@minorycosplay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
134subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003318522659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minorycosplay |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minorycosplay |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 134 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 135 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 132 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 123 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 117 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 117 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1s
- Average length
- 1s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 69.2% | |
| custom 5384280154564498126 | 3 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5199763175502792673 | 1 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
- Most on one post
- 4
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @minorycosplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 - madoka please, don’t go!! - sorry..i’ve got to go meet the others now…i don’t know when.. but i will see you again homura..promise!! 🤩🤩 мадока тгк тт хомура тгк тт #madokami#homura#madokamagica ||рт? реакции?вп?||
❤4custom 51997631755027926731custom 53842801545644981261
начала заниматься потому что вот был фестиваль алмакон и я узнала о нем за час до начала и сразу написала рине типо го пойдем и тд, и мы пошли туда, нам продали два билета за 11000 бтв (дешевле), и после этого феста меня очень вдохновило это все и я начала заниматься косплеем, первый косплей был на эму отори в январе
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! почему начала заниматься косплеем и какой был твой первый косплей? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
а еще будет джиро но это закос
❤1
следующий если вплане новый.. то секрет, но он будет с косбандом и из идена
❤1
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! какой следующий косплей ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.
t.me/anonaskbot?start=92kkxedn7wt5s2aq может анонки?
мама мирей🥹🩷
❤1custom 53842801545644981261
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️ецензия на комиккон! честно говоря, я ни разу не пожалела что потратила билеты сюда. было невероятно весело, столько талантливых и классных ребят собираются тут, и каждый по-своему хорош!! а ещё я хочу выразить огромную благодарность тем, кто проводил со мной практически все дни кк, а именно доча минори🌟 ханако, крока, дэко и рури тоже благодарю!! благодаря ним мы тоже классно потусилии 🌟 правда с нагр…
❤1custom 53842801545644981261
у нас бывают раздельные косплеи???? это миф лол
❤1
я заказала новый косплей опят с минори и к концу августа закажу косплей новый ОПЧТЬ К МИНОРИ🤩
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @minorycosplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@minorycosplay named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓻𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓼𝓹𝓵𝓪𝔂 🐇” (@minorycosplay), 134 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minorycosplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.