Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про IT и ноготочки

Channel

Про IT и ноготочки

@mishapimenova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

663subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002099915284
TypeChannel
Username@mishapimenova
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mishapimenova

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6606666637 August 2026 — 666 subscribers7 August 2026 — 666 subscribers15 August 2026 — 665 subscribers24 August 2026 — 662 subscribers31 August 2026 — 660 subscribers9 September 2026 — 663 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 659–667 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 12:18663+3
31 Aug 2026, 22:06660-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:17662-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:23665-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:17666no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01666first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

349 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💅11934.1%
💘9527.2%
🦄4512.9%
💋4212.0%
🍌288.02%
😈154.30%
🤷‍♀51.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mishapimenova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 February 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC207 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🦄13💅6💋5

5 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC249 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В целом когда все думают что кто-то дохрена в себе уверенный тут есть три ответа: он либо делал это тысячу раз, либо хорошо держит лицо, либо дурак)))). Четвертого не дано - все нервничают когда делают что-то новое, не привычное и важное. Так что учимся держать лицо…

💘14💅5🍌2

5 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC254 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘12🦄7💋2

19 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC628 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За последние пару лет я поняла одну неприятную вещь. Моя тревожность была не потому, что я не доверяю людям или потому, что люблю всё контролировать. Она была из-за ощущения, что я физически не могу увидеть всю картину. Компания растет. Сделок становится больше. Людей становится больше. Чатов становится больше. И в какой-то момент ты понимаешь, что просто не успеваешь всё держать в голове. А дальше начинается само

💘19💋2🍌1🦄1

25 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC701 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кажется по текущему нашему найму дела у компании лучше чем я думаю…

💅15

18 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC893 views31 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда комментарием набрала больше лайков чем пост…

💋12😈10💅6🍌2🤷‍♀1

18 Jun 2026, 06:57 UTC789 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#жизненныйурок Спи!

💅6💋2🍌1

17 Jun 2026, 20:38 UTC750 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самое сложное — это когда команда поругалась с клиентом, а ты пытаешься быть объективным. И вот в чем прикол: не всегда прав клиент. Не всегда права команда. А сохранить надо и тех, и других. Команде надо показать, где она облажалась. Клиенту — что ты его слышишь и ошибки разберешь. Но еще аккуратно донести, что ошибки команды часто растут из кривой постановки задачи. И при этом никого нельзя задеть. Классика жанра.

💘16🦄5💅4

11 Jun 2026, 19:29 UTC818 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вышел первый выпуск где мы говорим с клиентами о клиентских проблемах «Честно с Мишей». С почином меня… это шаг на который мне очень сложно было пойти так как много комплексов по поводу внешности… уже записан второй выпуск про геймофикацию.

💅6🍌4💋2

30 May 2026, 15:52 UTC933 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Это очень интересно. Тут в комментариях дизайнеры-мусульмане обсуждают является ли использование нейросетей грехом. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYzszpotttL/?igsh=MWcxcHB3d2dwcW41Nw== Мне кажется, что это интересно, особенно в формате того, что ждать если ты нанимаешь такого человека. Если коротко, то генерить не живые объекты можно. А вот людей и животных - нет. Более того, фотография с человеком ок, а вот ретушир

🤷‍♀3🦄3

8 May 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,150 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По поводу психолога я, кажется, наконец поняла, почему у меня раньше не складывалось. Мне всегда мои потенциальные психологи казались сильно тупее меня. Очень странное ощущение, когда ты сидишь напротив человека и воспринимаешь его как кого-то, глупее тебя. Тяжело открываться человеку, которого ты внутренне не уважаешь. Сейчас же мой психолог для меня очень интересный человек. Он постоянно подкидывает какие-то иссл

💘18🍌2💋1

5 May 2026, 14:58 UTC828 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как думаете сойдет за бизнес преимущество:

🤷‍♀1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mishapimenova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про IT и ноготочки” (@mishapimenova), 663 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishapimenova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.