Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Misha Puffer :3

Channel

Misha Puffer :3

@mishapuffer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

75subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525221649
TypeChannel
Username@mishapuffer
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mishapuffer

Growth

747574.510 August 2026 — 74 subscribers10 August 2026 — 74 subscribers17 August 2026 — 75 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:4875+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:4374no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:0174first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

442 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17138.7%
💔9120.6%
😭7517.0%
🤯388.60%
😢194.30%
😱102.26%
❤‍🔥71.58%
🫡51.13%
👀40.905%
👨‍💻40.905%
🍌30.679%
🍓30.679%
🤔30.679%
💯20.452%
🤬20.452%
👍10.226%
👎10.226%
🕊10.226%
🤡10.226%
🤷10.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2025 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 08:47 UTC134 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Квіти від друзів Міші. Дякую Юлічка❤️

22

27 May 2026, 22:05 UTC135 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Купила йому нову ляльку. Сподіваюсь, що сподобається, коли він повернеться. Раніше б сподобалась.

26🍓2👍1

27 May 2026, 21:53 UTC121 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Мій любий сину, мій Мішутко… Сьогодні тобі мало виповнитися 26 років. І я дуже хочу вірити, що саме так і є — що тобі вже 26, що ти живий, що десь дихаєш, дивишся на небо, усміхаєшся або просто мовчиш, але живеш. Для мене ти назавжди залишаєшся моїм хлопчиком — добрим, рідним, найстаршим сином. Але я не хочу, щоб тобі було назавжди 25. Ні. Я хочу, щоб час для тебе йшов далі. Щоб були нові дні, нові світанки, нові р

28

8 Feb 2026, 20:11 UTC267 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Я давно не заходила в чат. Мне это больно делать. Про Мишу нет никаких новостей. В группах военнопленных его не выставляли. Во все организации, связанные с поиском пропавших, обратилась. Но везде тишина.

😭23💔10

10 Oct 2025, 05:30 UTC596 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Привет, а тут есть кто-то с Белоруссии?

8 Oct 2025, 17:50 UTC590 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

16❤‍🔥7🕊1

7 Oct 2025, 13:09 UTC556 views41 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💔33😢61🤯1

1 Oct 2025, 15:27 UTC542 views48 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Шанс на то что они живы и вернутся есть, так что, кто во что-то верит - молитесь!

43🫡3💯2

1 Oct 2025, 11:53 UTC497 viewsread 10 August 2026

Естественно, если вы увидите, что Миша в сети-это я. Мой номер +380976222365

1 Oct 2025, 11:48 UTC498 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Это его мама, Лиля. Информации мало. Эти суки даже не могут сказать, когда в последний раз они выходили на связь. Готовят вещи на отправку и документы.

🤯16💔4😭4

1 Oct 2025, 11:46 UTC527 views49 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сьогодні мені сказали, що Міша і його група є зниклою безвісти.

😭34🤯8😢61

26 Aug 2025, 10:51 UTC392 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Дуже хочется написати, що все добре. Але поки такої можливості немає 🫩 Інтенсив зайняв по факту 5 днів. І потім пів дня нам дали вихідний. Все було важко і тяжко, хоч якесь розуміння є після БЗВП. Але виходить в мене не дуже. Декілька разів була ситуація, коли інструктори жартома питали: " В тебе, що сили немає?". А я на серйозі відповідаю, що так. Не знаю чи звертають тут увагу на це, чи ми для них просто жива од

12😭10💔4🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mishapuffer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Misha Puffer :3” (@mishapuffer), 75 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mishapuffer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.