Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for • ШОУ ГЁРЛЗ • ИРИНА КЕЙ

Channel

• ШОУ ГЁРЛЗ • ИРИНА КЕЙ

@missadrenalinK

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,195subscribers

-212 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296916893
TypeChannel
Usernames@missadrenalinK @show_girls_irinakey
Created24 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/missadrenalinK

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,1956,4296,3127 August 2026 — 6,407 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,407 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,408 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,395 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,380 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,385 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,375 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,367 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,429 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,322 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,273 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,242 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,235 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,211 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,203 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,203 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,195 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
17 measurements spanning 43 days, net -212. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,160–6,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:386,195-8
17 Sept 2026, 12:226,203no change
17 Sept 2026, 11:476,203-8
16 Sept 2026, 15:556,211-24
12 Sept 2026, 12:586,235-7
8 Sept 2026, 08:546,242-31
3 Sept 2026, 14:006,273-49
31 Aug 2026, 04:136,322-107
27 Aug 2026, 20:476,429+62
24 Aug 2026, 19:056,367-8
20 Aug 2026, 20:156,375-10
17 Aug 2026, 20:566,385+5
14 Aug 2026, 10:096,380-15
11 Aug 2026, 00:046,395-13
7 Aug 2026, 15:556,408+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:016,407no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:506,407first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.62%
avg views ÷ 6,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
472
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held26 (5 August 202617 September 2026)
Views total3,305
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 05s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

561 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 584824452070087551045180.4%
custom 53009473307767166396711.9%
custom 5303483225497154111244.28%
custom 527619111351276041191.60%
custom 527195286555487070361.07%
custom 527866975631915435540.713%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC256 views16 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

ОЖИДАНИЕ VS РЕАЛЬНОСТЬ Именно поэтому я не очень-то любительница покупать вещи, которые "ах, как прекрасно на подиуме и в лукбуке бренда", я, как стилист, прекрасно понимаю где будет подвох —— поэтому прежде чем купить вещь, важно посмотреть как она сидит на реальной женщине (с грудью там, бедрами, животиком, а не точеной модели, которую пригласили сняться в рекламной кампании) Образ Balenciaga

custom 530094733077671663914custom 58482445207008755102

17 Sept 2026, 05:36 UTC367 views13 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Иной раз листаю ленту, восхищаюсь работой селебрити стилистов, а потом «хоп» и нарываешься на такие решения, от которых глазки слезой наполняются Это вот скажите, для чего в такие образы наряжать девушку? А после официальной части еще и апдейт футболкой сделать? Но ведь не осуждения ради, а для наглядности: посмотрите как работает вертикаль в верхней части образа. Как декольте облегчает портретную зону и как фут

custom 52761911135127604119custom 52786697563191543554

16 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC488 views30 reactionsread 17 September 2026

У многих в И. возник вопрос: "Ирина, почему ничего не купили из одежды?" Отвечаю: потому что локальный рынок в полной мере закрывает мою потребность в покупке актуальной, качественной одежды. Да, я ради интереса зашла в ZARA, H&M STUDIO, ARKET, COS, но там настолько все пресно, скучно, в первых двух просто горы наваленной синтетической одежды, что мне даже ходить среди рейлов не хотелось В люкс зашла, но не испыт

custom 584824452070087551030

16 Sept 2026, 15:41 UTC457 views22 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

«Что Ирина Кей купила в Европах?» Часть 2 1. Сумка Massimo Dutti 2. Аромат Diptique L'Ombre Dans L'Eau 3. Крем для рук Loewe 4. Бальзам для губ Hermes 5. Тушь для ресниц коричневая Hermes 6. Шторы ZARA 7. Кошка LEGO 🌟🌟

custom 584824452070087551022

16 Sept 2026, 06:34 UTC544 views22 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Ух ты, а вы знали, что у бренда Saint Laurent есть дочерняя кинопроизводственная компания, созданная знаменитым французским домом моды в апреле 2023 года? Я узнала и искренне порадовалась этому потому что люблю кино —— это один из видов интеллектуального отдыха для меня Бренд стал первым в истории модным домом, который официально занялся полным циклом производства художественных фильмов. Проект инициировал креативны

custom 584824452070087551019custom 53009473307767166393

15 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC578 views29 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Video

Начинаю делиться контентом под названием «Что Ирина Кей купила в Европах?» Но сначала посмотрите на то, что благодаря нашим локальным бренда выручило меня в «этих Европах» 1. Сумка Áskent (IRINAKEY10) 2. Мокасины LIME 3. Кардхолдер Áskent (IRINAKEY10)

custom 584824452070087551024custom 53009473307767166395

15 Sept 2026, 07:37 UTC615 viewsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Вот уж точно breaking news Кто не в курсе, 13 сентября на показе бренда COS, экоактивисты организации PETA ворвались в зал с заявлениями о жестоком обращении с овцами, чью шерсть использует бренд Так вот, скандал не столько в том, что страдают бедные овечки (точно страдают?!), а в том, что генеральный директор Союза американских модельеров (CFDA) нападает на активистов, закрывает им рот руками и одну из них удержи

11 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC316 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Благодарю за ответы в голосовании, я знаю, что первый пункт выбираю те, кто весной был на моем проекте и уже знает и свой психотип и то, как важно все знания о себе собрать воедино ——— без этого снова бесконечный шопинг, снова бесконечно неподходящие или иногда подходящие покупки. Наш гардероб есть система ——— это знание основа всего. Когда вы это поймете, вам перестанет быть тревожно за то, что вы что-то упускаете.

custom 584824452070087551017custom 53009473307767166392

11 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC340 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Интересно, знаете ли вы свой психотип?

  1. да я уже знаю свой психотип и это правда работает35%
  2. слышала о том, что его важно знать, но не знаю, как самой его определить52%
  3. впервые об этом инструменте слышу13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC340 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В комментарии и директ мне пришло огромное количество сообщений примерно в одном ключе: Хочу узнать свой психотип Как понять, какой у меня? А как можно определить свой? Я наконец поняла, почему мне так сложно найти свой стиль Для меня это довольно показательные вопросы, потому что сколько бы вещей мы ни покупали, сколько бы стилистов ни давали нам готовые формулы и сколько бы раз мы ни перебирали гардероб —— всё эт

custom 584824452070087551015custom 53009473307767166392

11 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC362 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Когда мне пишут и говорят, что женщинам больше не интересна тема стиля, я предпочитаю опираться не на эмоции отдельных лиц, а на цифры, которые всегда говорят красноречивее любого оратора За выходные, с одного поста на тему о важности работы с психотипами и первоисточниками, на мой блок подписалось 298 человек 🤎 И, судя по сообщениям, я попала в одну из самых больных точек женщин в поиске своего персонального сти

custom 58482445207008755109custom 53009473307767166392

9 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC619 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

За лето перечитано 12 книг В основном российская классика, навсегда любимый Лев Николаевич, с ним Антон Павлович, Михаил Юрьевич тоже был, Иван Сергеевич и Александр Сергеевич тоже… Перешла на американские романы. Знакомлюсь с новым автором ——— Уильям Фолкнер не был лауреатом и победителем Букеровской премии (о которой я скоро напишу), зато Нобелевскую премию по литературе, за значительный с художественной точки

custom 584824452070087551026

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @missadrenalinK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

Интересно, знаете ли вы свой психотип?

  1. да я уже знаю свой психотип и это правда работает35%
  2. слышала о том, что его важно знать, но не знаю, как самой его определить52%
  3. впервые об этом инструменте слышу13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTCAnonymous Poll81 voters

Был ли у вас опыт приема Оземпик / Мунджаро / Тирзетта?

  1. Да. Я хотела похудеть.16%
  2. Да. Как медицинская коррекция диабета4%
  3. Нет, но периодически думаю об этом36%
  4. Нет! Я презираю тех, кто так худеет (хотя это не мое дело)44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🅅🄸🅃🄰 🄿🄸🅂🄷🄴🅃
@VITA_PISHET · 23,892
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
Inside out with Irma
@irmadaily · 26,525
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
kate.katkova
@katekatkova · 75,563
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Oksana Rim
@oksanarim1 · 36,100
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Marianna Eliseeva
@mariannaeliseeva · 95,210
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Катькало
@Juliacatcalo · 24,237
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
Стильный стилист стилизует
@leushinastylist · 47,193
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
YesDressNoStress | Стася Кульбацкая
@yesdressnostress · 48,389
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
STEPRITA
@leopardhunt · 38,031
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Azalia L/ stylist
@azalial · 42,554
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
GLAMORAMA
@glamoramablog · 28,837
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
PERVERT
@perrverrt · 23,039
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 19 September 2026
V I V A L A V I K A
@Viva_la_vika · 44,199
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 August 2026
time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,502
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“• ШОУ ГЁРЛЗ • ИРИНА КЕЙ” (@missadrenalinK), 6,195 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/show_girls_irinakey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.