Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рест/𝔐𝔦𝔰𝔰 𝔨𝔳𝔞𝔡𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔨

Channel

Рест/𝔐𝔦𝔰𝔰 𝔨𝔳𝔞𝔡𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔨

@misskvadratik

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

+65 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004334005613
TypeChannel
Username@misskvadratik
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/misskvadratik

Growth

4110673.58 August 2026 — 41 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers16 August 2026 — 57 subscribers23 August 2026 — 48 subscribers30 August 2026 — 72 subscribers8 September 2026 — 87 subscribers16 September 2026 — 106 subscribers8 August 202616 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:56106+19
8 Sept 2026, 15:4087+15
30 Aug 2026, 07:3572+24
23 Aug 2026, 02:4348-9
16 Aug 2026, 02:1857+14
10 Aug 2026, 16:3143no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:5243+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:0341first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5203950158731051369525.0%
custom 5377636643316465921525.0%
❤420.0%
❤‍🔥420.0%
custom 5233311895196306033210.0%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026

Так хорошо шли набирали 10+ реакций, тут то что началось?!

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC3 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @meowixzai

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Союзы или подписчики которые читают мой канал. Перешлите это к себе в канал, у кого нет канала напишите в комментариях. Так же поставьте реакцию. 😉

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC4 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️ ⚰️⚰️⚰️⚰️ 🖤🖤🖤🖤 Автор: @misskvadratik tegs: #руби #лагерь_санты #квадратик #жду_реакции

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC7 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤 🖤 🔦🔦🔦🔦 🔦🔦🔦🔦 🔦🔦🔦🔦🔦 Автор: @misskvadratik tegs: #кира #мила #лиана #закрытая_школа #ночь_ужосов_в_лагере #квадратик #жду_реакции

❤‍🔥2custom 52333118951963060332custom 52039501587310513691custom 53776366433164659211

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC6 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @meowixzaiPoll

Выбираем шрифт

  1. 🌟🌟🌟21%
  2. 🔤🔤🔤33%
  3. 🤍🤍🤍42%
  4. 🤩🤩🤩17%
  5. 🌟🌟🌟4%
  6. 🔤🔤🔤29%
  7. 🤩🤩🤩17%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А можно не надо

custom 53776366433164659211

Signed 𐌑яʙκа. 🪨

10 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC8 viewsread 10 August 2026

Не правильно, надо убить того кто пиздит союзы

Signed ■

10 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

+ᴋʙᴀдᴩᴀᴛиᴋ Пᴩиʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙую ʙᴀᴄ ʙ ʍиᴩᴇ ᴋʙᴀдᴩᴀᴛиᴋᴏв, ᴩᴀдᴀ ʙᴀᴄ ɜдᴇᴄь ʙидᴇᴛь. Ꮋᴀдᴇюᴄь нᴀ дᴏᴧᴦий и хᴏᴩᴏɯий ᴄᴏюɜ. Я ᴋʙᴀдᴩᴀᴛиᴋ ʙᴧд ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴀ Ꭲуᴛ ᴇᴄᴛь ᴀдʍины: Я ʍяуʙᴀ Ꮶᴀᴋ ᴋ ʙᴀʍ ʍᴏжнᴏ ᴏбᴩᴀщᴀᴛьᴄя?

custom 52039501587310513691

Signed ■

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @misskvadratik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Выбираем шрифт

  1. 🌟🌟🌟21%
  2. 🔤🔤🔤33%
  3. 🤍🤍🤍42%
  4. 🤩🤩🤩17%
  5. 🌟🌟🌟4%
  6. 🔤🔤🔤29%
  7. 🤩🤩🤩17%

The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рест/𝔐𝔦𝔰𝔰 𝔨𝔳𝔞𝔡𝔯𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔨” (@misskvadratik), 106 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misskvadratik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.