Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for — Внутрянка Поэны🫧

Channel

— Внутрянка Поэны🫧

@misty_994

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002375232303
TypeChannel
Username@misty_994
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/misty_994

Growth

163166164.510 August 2026 — 163 subscribers11 August 2026 — 163 subscribers19 August 2026 — 166 subscribers25 August 2026 — 165 subscribers2 September 2026 — 166 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 23:46166+1
25 Aug 2026, 20:58165-1
19 Aug 2026, 04:11166+3
11 Aug 2026, 14:02163no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:46163first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🦄2928.2%
custom 52782313733022399541716.5%
custom 53528646033929878061514.6%
custom 54338282759756613921413.6%
🕊1312.6%
❤‍🔥1110.7%
🙏21.94%
custom 542952446534196478810.971%
🎉10.971%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC26 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— Хоть меня там и нет, но я обожаю каждого из этой компании Майншилдовцев!! – Я даже не могу описать всю ту любовь и радость, что я испытываю, когда встречаюсь с вами🥰

custom 52782313733022399546🦄1custom 54338282759756613921

10 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @lovecospPhoto

Как же я обожаю своих ребят из фд Майншилда! Такие комфортные и милые все!! ☀☀☀☀☀☀☀

custom 52782313733022399547🦄2

9 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC53 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤗🤗🤗🤗🤗🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🧪 Коллаб с Лофи!! ⛄️ • – И до рассвета пусть горит любовь, любовь – И без ответа всё оставлю вновь и вновь – И не важно, где сейчас и с кем ты шепчешь комплименты – Вижу я насквозь твою любовь. Твою любовь • 🦨 Джаст 🌟 🌟 Альфедов ⛄️ #арт #коллаб #ДЖФ #Just_S #Alfedov

custom 53528646033929878068custom 52782313733022399544❤‍🔥2🦄1custom 54338282759756613921

9 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— Какая прелесть! 😛

🦄3🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC56 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— С ДНЕМ РОЖДЕНИЯ!! 🥰

❤‍🔥3🦄2🎉1

5 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC77 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

— Ох.. Какой праздник у нас? Крещение? Свадьба? Какое мероприятие у нас?..😖

🕊5🦄1custom 54338282759756613921

5 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @santosODPhoto

Удивил молодого, он от такого аж ливнул сразу 😂

🕊6🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @misty_994. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“— Внутрянка Поэны🫧” (@misty_994), 166 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/misty_994.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.