Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for miwayo ndutdh open

Channel

miwayo ndutdh open

@miwayoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

374subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003414395301
TypeChannel
Username@miwayoo
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/miwayoo

Growth

3323743538 August 2026 — 332 subscribers8 August 2026 — 332 subscribers15 August 2026 — 337 subscribers22 August 2026 — 336 subscribers28 August 2026 — 357 subscribers3 September 2026 — 374 subscribers8 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 26 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 326–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 06:08374+17
28 Aug 2026, 01:38357+21
22 Aug 2026, 02:14336-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:44337+5
8 Aug 2026, 15:26332no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:01332first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7147.7%
😭1912.8%
😢1610.7%
🔥106.71%
🍓96.04%
64.03%
👎53.36%
💘53.36%
🥰53.36%
🦄21.34%
🎄10.671%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

trust me, Billiam itu cinta banget sama Axel (buktinya Billiam ngelakuin itu semua buat Axel) It's just about his greed for fame ♥️. mereka bakal be together happily ever after in the next life

2

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

7. Axel's eye colors originally tu olive, but like I say, it's being eaten out by the rats so Billiam took out his brother's eyes for them

2

5 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

6. axel punya attachment issues I must say, which is why mudah banget buat Billiam buat brainwash si axel, dibuat buat seolah olah Billiam ini cinta banget sama dia abis itu nanti di siksa lagi

2

5 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

aku inget ada yang sempet nanya di bort oc ku tentang lore nya si axel ini, ak jelasin disini aja nyak sedikit sedikitt ♥️.

1

5 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026

5. There's a reason why Billiam ga ngebiarin tikus tikus nya langsung makan pusat akar nya Axel dari awal biar dia ☠ dulu sebelum di santap sama tikus tikus, karena menurut dia lebih menyedihkan jiwa nya pasti lebih lezat untuk santapan si dewa yang ia sembah sembah ^___

5 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

4. Spent almost 4 years locked and tied in Billiam's study sambil di gerogotin sama tikus-tikus liar yang sengaja dibiarkan masuk dan berkembang biak disana, tenggorokan nya di cabik, dia juga kehilangan ke-dua matanya in the process. Pas tikus tikus nya hampir ngenain pusat akar nya si axel, baru lah Billiam bertindak dan "menyelamatkan" Axel, what a romantic scene indeed ♥️.

1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC53 viewsread 8 August 2026

3. Axel ga akan ☠ meski di gerogotin sekalipun kecuali mereka langsung makan pusat akar nya si axel yang terletak di dalam dada nya jadi semacam pengganti jantung dan alat pernafasan lainnya karena dia kan bukan manusia (basically dia gaada organ sih)

5 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

2. Testimoni makhluk makhluk yang uda pernah icip icip Axel itungannya baru 5 orang, makan yang beneran makan, Dan kata mereka Axel itu manis gurih dan juicy, mostly gurih dan recommend kalo di panggang

4

5 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC53 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

AXELL: 1. Axel itu definisi dari emergency food itu sendiri, people might find it weird kalo semisal mereka ga tau axel itu apa, they're actually a fungus and an edible one 🍄♥️. (axel itu oc ku yang pink, yang ku pakai untuk moots banner)

🔥42

5 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC69 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

what if 1 react 1 fun fact/lore about miwäyis dan antek anteknya (oc)

10🔥53🍓3💘3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miwayoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“miwayo ndutdh open” (@miwayoo), 374 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miwayoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.