Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mikhail Krutikhin

Channel

Mikhail Krutikhin

@mkrutikhin

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

14,082subscribers

-262 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001238488636
TypeChannel
Username@mkrutikhin
Created3 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mkrutikhin

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,08214,34414,2135 August 2026 — 14,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,331 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,319 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,314 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,313 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,308 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,302 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,298 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,271 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,267 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,266 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,261 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,254 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,252 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,240 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,235 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,228 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,221 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,217 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,212 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,206 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,202 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,199 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,189 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,179 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,172 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,156 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,140 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,127 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,108 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,099 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,082 subscribers5 August 202617 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,043–14,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:3914,082-17
15 Sept 2026, 15:3814,099-9
13 Sept 2026, 22:2014,108-19
12 Sept 2026, 04:0114,127-13
9 Sept 2026, 17:3814,140-16
6 Sept 2026, 07:0214,156-16
4 Sept 2026, 04:0114,172-7
2 Sept 2026, 20:0614,179-10
1 Sept 2026, 17:2714,189-10
31 Aug 2026, 14:5514,199-3
30 Aug 2026, 12:4414,202-4
29 Aug 2026, 14:1314,206-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:0214,212-5
27 Aug 2026, 13:0514,217-4
26 Aug 2026, 13:2914,221-7
25 Aug 2026, 14:4414,228-7
24 Aug 2026, 13:5414,235-5
22 Aug 2026, 22:0414,240-12
21 Aug 2026, 09:5714,252-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:1714,254first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,822 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,42741.7%
😁74212.7%
💯60110.3%
5609.62%
🤣2915.00%
😭2243.85%
🔥2193.76%
👏2023.47%
🤬1783.06%
😢1051.80%
🤡881.51%
👀370.636%
👎330.567%
😱200.344%
🥴150.258%
🎉130.223%
🤮120.206%
🙏90.155%
❤‍🔥80.137%
👌70.12%
11 further kinds310.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,822 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 24 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Nov 2025, 18:56 UTC≈38,100 views528 reactionsread 2 September 2026

JPMorgan в новом прогнозе ждёт цену барреля в 2026 году на уровне немного больше $50, а в 2027 году - $30. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/jp-morgan-says-oil-prices-could-plunge-into-30s-by-2027/ar-AA1R3yhO?ocid=BingNewsSerp

👍302👏7357👀34🔥19😱14🤡12😁10

24 Nov 2025, 15:29 UTC≈35,500 views477 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯241🤬97😢5719😁17👎14👏13👌6

24 Nov 2025, 13:05 UTC≈31,900 views742 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Уфф, отлегло. Росговнадзор опроверг сообщения о том, что жопу признали непристойным словом в словаре государственного (!) языка. Запрещать системообразующие понятия недопустимо.

😁341🤣249👏64💯4213🎉13👍10🤡4

24 Nov 2025, 12:24 UTC≈28,500 views548 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭223💯156🤬81😢479👎9😁9🤡7

23 Nov 2025, 18:51 UTC≈23,100 views192 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzGJwOwDMT8

👍134🔥2519💯7🤡3😁3😭1

23 Nov 2025, 18:49 UTC≈19,000 views124 reactionsread 2 September 2026

На болгарском. https://bnr.bg/horizont/post/102243937/mihail-krutihin-rusia-shte-nameri-novi-kupuvachi-za-petrola-si

👍8725🔥6👏2👌1💩1🤣1🤮1

22 Nov 2025, 20:59 UTC≈16,800 views512 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @ivan_tyutrin

Заявление Форума свободной России по поводу так называемого «мирного плана» Дональда Трампа по Украине Форум свободной России выражает решительное неприятие предложенного Дональдом Трампом так называемого «мирного плана» по Украине. Этот документ — не план, а ультиматум, который ставит украинское руководство перед выбором: либо согласиться на требования, выгодные исключительно России, либо продолжать войну в условия

👍29994💯58🤡28🔥15🤮6🤣4🤔3

21 Nov 2025, 16:27 UTC≈14,200 views182 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tF7B5vKdYW4

👍14129🔥8💯2🥴2

20 Nov 2025, 15:21 UTC≈15,400 views651 reactionsread 2 September 2026

По дурости потратил сегодня больше часа на онлайновый экономический семинар, соблазнившись темой: прогнозирование ВВП России и добычи Газпрома. Можно было отключиться с первого слайда, где целый доктор экономических наук Антон Афанасьев перепутал экспорт с импортом и обвинил во всех бедах западные санкции, введённые против белых и пушистых России и Газпрома. Из уважения к давним друзьям, проводящим эти семинары, про

😁362👍17541🤣37❤‍🔥8🥴8👏6💯6

19 Nov 2025, 11:43 UTC≈13,900 views116 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu1dvZUchYc

👍8723🔥4🤮2

16 Nov 2025, 08:48 UTC≈17,600 views164 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.moscowtimes.ru/2025/11/14/lukoil-ne-dostanetsya-sechinu-a180159

👍12720🤡13👀2👏2

15 Nov 2025, 12:16 UTC≈16,100 views171 reactionsread 2 September 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0KYaIo8f2w

👍122🔥27💯116🤡2🍾1👀1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mkrutikhin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Николай Травкин
@NTravkin · 25,306
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
ЭКОНОМИСТ ИГОРЬ ЛИПСИЦ
@LipsitsIgor · 40,201
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Who is Who | Ху из Ху
@whiswh · 24,659
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q21103013 on Wikidata, read 13 September 2026
LabelMikhail Krutikhin
DescriptionRussian oil and gas market specialist

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mikhail Krutikhin” (@mkrutikhin), 14,082 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mkrutikhin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.