Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 软软的评价🍓

Channel

软软的评价🍓

@mlbhlj528829

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

649subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003814537645
TypeChannel
Username@mlbhlj528829
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlbhlj528829

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

64969167013 August 2026 — 691 subscribers13 August 2026 — 691 subscribers20 August 2026 — 667 subscribers28 August 2026 — 674 subscribers3 September 2026 — 654 subscribers11 September 2026 — 649 subscribers13 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 643–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 21:22649-5
3 Sept 2026, 14:38654-20
28 Aug 2026, 06:13674+7
20 Aug 2026, 08:24667-24
13 Aug 2026, 21:46691no change
13 Aug 2026, 21:35691first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @hlj829

早上好呀老公老公 起来水群啦 可以约课啦

1

30 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,930 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

晚课还有位置啦 定金留位啦

1

29 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,480 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

杭州学生会:https://t.me/students_union 评分标准:6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】:#软软@hlj829829 【出击留名】:绿帽子 【出击时间】:7月28日 【大概位置】:上城 【修车水费】:工兵 【高端服务】:有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】:人照9分,颜值好看 【身高身材】:身高162 没有纹身 【胸器罩杯】:胸b 肤色正常 【湿度紧度】:水多 毛正常 紧 【课室环境】:小区停车方便,出入无门禁 【个人卫生】:无抽烟,有陪浴,有浴巾/漱口水/牙刷 【时间管理】:排课合理,无催客赶客,有情绪价值 【服务点评】:服务好 态度好 价格合理,值得二刷 【推荐程度】:9分 【流程细节】:兑换了老师的工兵 和老师约好上课时间 立马出发 半个小时左右就到了 老师回复很及时 到了直接遥控上楼

1

29 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

杭州学生会:https://t.me/students_union 评分标准:6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】:#软软@hlj829829 【出击留名】:花海 【出击时间】:7月29日 【大概位置】:上城区 【修车水费】:工兵p 【高端服务】:有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】:人照9分,御姐类型 穿搭有气质 【身高身材】:身高162 没有纹身 腰腹少量肉 【胸器罩杯】:罩杯b 乳头粉 皮肤光滑 【湿度紧度】:户型蝴蝶 毛发不多 紧湿做爱反馈真实 【课室环境】:小区/公寓,停车方便,出入无门禁 【个人卫生】:无抽烟,有陪浴,有浴巾/漱口水/牙刷 【时间管理】:排课合理,无催客赶客,有情绪价值 【服务点评】:价格合理,值得二刷 【推荐程度】:9.2 【流程细节】:昨天和老师约了今天 老师把头课给了我很感谢 中午休息立马出发去找老师

1

29 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈1,040 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

杭州学生会:https://t.me/students_union 评分标准:6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】:#软软@hlj829829 【出击留名】:西门 【出击时间】:7月28日 【大概位置】:上城区 【修车水费】:600p工兵 【高端服务】:有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】:人照一致 颜值很高 【身高身材】:身高163左右 纹身没注意 腰腹有一丢丢肉 【胸器罩杯】:罩杯b胸型,乳头粉褐 皮肤偏白 【湿度紧度】:户型蝴蝶 毛发不多 紧致水量多 做爱反馈真实 【课室环境】:小区/公寓,停车方便,出入无门禁 【个人卫生】:有抽烟,有陪浴,有浴巾/漱口水/牙刷 【时间管理】:排课合理,无催客赶客,有情绪价值 【服务点评】:优先温柔 漂亮 价格合理,否值得二刷 【推荐程度】:9分 【流程细节】:老师一上榜 工兵立马被兑换了只剩一

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mlbhlj528829. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“软软的评价🍓” (@mlbhlj528829), 649 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlbhlj528829.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.