За тачки шарите?! 🚗 МЫ С МЛЕЧНЫМ И ДАМИРОМ ЗАЛЕТЕЛИ НА ВЫПУСК КОНТЕЙНЕРОВ 🫙 🚨 срочно зацените че выбили: https://youtu.be/-fd8DdhIxvE?si=BuHvAQqNRfK5-u9X
❤35🔥5🌭2

Channel
@mlechniyone
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,323subscribers
-702 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001129240590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mlechniyone |
| Description | мотивирую. РКН: № 6862181008 |
| Created | 7 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mlechniyone |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:00 | 12,323 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:39 | 12,334 | +2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 12,332 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 12,323 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:26 | 12,334 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:16 | 12,344 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:26 | 12,360 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 12,364 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:45 | 12,370 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:27 | 12,378 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 12,387 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 12,395 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 12,401 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 12,421 | -3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 12,424 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 12,434 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 12,445 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 12,453 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 12,457 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 12,467 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,708 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 888 | 52.0% | |
| 😁 | 394 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 262 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 3.69% | |
| 🌭 | 47 | 2.75% | |
| 😭 | 32 | 1.87% | |
| 💊 | 13 | 0.761% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.293% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.234% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mlechniyone. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
За тачки шарите?! 🚗 МЫ С МЛЕЧНЫМ И ДАМИРОМ ЗАЛЕТЕЛИ НА ВЫПУСК КОНТЕЙНЕРОВ 🫙 🚨 срочно зацените че выбили: https://youtu.be/-fd8DdhIxvE?si=BuHvAQqNRfK5-u9X
❤35🔥5🌭2
Posted without readable text
🔥128❤36
С какой стороны не посмотри, крутейшая поездка и мероприятие! Жаль, что удалился, но в любом случае ребята доделали работу. Красавцы! Рад был быть частью этой истории. Когда пели гимн, это отдельное впечатление на долгие годы вперед. P.S. трек попозже зальем куда-нибудь)
❤109👍14🔥12
Video message, posted without a caption
❤75🌭1👍1
Сборник, которого вы действительно заслужили! Вообще прикольно, кипу раздали, пофоткали красиво, потренировались, послушали стендап) Не знаю, что из этого всего выйдет, но в любом случае пока все прикольно. Мне с моей циклотимией в самый раз такие путешествия.
❤78👍10🌭6🔥3
Мои топ-3 оппа за всю историю: 1. Тина Канделаки; 2. Айза; 3. Леонид Слуцкий.
😁124❤12🌭6🏆3👍1🔥1😭1
вместо колыбельной… думаю за это меня могут лишить родительских прав…
😁63❤7🌭3👍1💊1
Екатеринбург, спасибо! Для меня эта поездка стала глотком свежего воздуха и хорошей разгрузкой для головы. Много футбола, пофотографировался, съездил в музеи; в общем, заставил себя не лежать всё свободное время в номере. По своему состоянию заметил, что, когда появляется приподнятое настроение и кажется, что всё в норме, дальше следует яма. Нырять в неё не хочется, поэтому по приезду буду стараться что-то с этим д…
❤84👍11🌭9
Сегодня, кажется, впервые нормально прочувствовал на себе, что такое циклотимия. Я пошёл к психологу и психиатру после периода, когда пару недель был в жёстком упадке. Тогда я не знал никаких диагнозов, просто понимал, что со мной что-то происходит. Когда начал заниматься, мне действительно стало лучше, я был уверен, что иду на поправку, у меня все получается, сил и времени хватает на всё и даже больше. Но, видимо,…
❤65🌭7😭6🔥1
Как бы не было забавно, но в День Рождение сына приходится объявлять о приостановлении существования другого детища. 2,5 года плотнейших приколов, эмоций, радости, разочарований, знакомств, счастья, горя, работы и все это встает на паузу. Все чувства и слова благодарности написал в заявлении клуба, почитайте, в остальном хотелось бы более подробно рассказать как обстоят дела. Проведена большая работа по поиску нов…
❤84😭20👍6🌭2🔥1
В чём вообще проблема. Расскажу, пока показываю Климу бульдозер) В какой-то момент я начал замечать, что меня перестало что-то интересовать. Просто пропали хобби, интересы, желание куда-то идти. Меня перестали радовать вещи, которые простого человека вгоняли бы в восторг. Работа и проекты делались просто потому что «надо». Книги, фильмы не возможно читать, я не могу ни на чём сфокусироваться. Про творчество вообщ…
❤69👍8😭5🌭3
Некоторые люди помнят, что месяц назад я пытался тут вести дневники, но процессик встал. Как всегда)) Скажу так, я абсолютно не похож и не ощущаю себя человеком, который имеет какие-то отклонения, но в поисках ответов на вопрос почему так, да и у поисках ответов на другие вопросы я решил начать заниматься с психологом, который отправил меня к психиатру, для того, чтобы на всякий случай меня посмотрели. Итого мы име…
❤64👍6🌭5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mlechniyone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВАНЯ МЛЕЧНЫЙ” (@mlechniyone), 12,323 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlechniyone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.