National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
30 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1,706. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137,301–139,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 04:20
139,263
+66
4 Sept 2026, 10:58
139,197
+58
2 Sept 2026, 19:54
139,139
-2
1 Sept 2026, 19:25
139,141
-3
31 Aug 2026, 21:17
139,144
+48
30 Aug 2026, 23:38
139,096
+17
29 Aug 2026, 23:42
139,079
+116
29 Aug 2026, 01:55
138,963
+148
28 Aug 2026, 01:57
138,815
+195
27 Aug 2026, 00:42
138,620
+170
26 Aug 2026, 03:24
138,450
+386
24 Aug 2026, 23:52
138,064
+140
23 Aug 2026, 10:56
137,924
-15
21 Aug 2026, 22:28
137,939
+8
20 Aug 2026, 20:33
137,931
-42
19 Aug 2026, 21:02
137,973
+34
18 Aug 2026, 22:24
137,939
+15
17 Aug 2026, 19:18
137,924
+15
16 Aug 2026, 19:53
137,909
+3
15 Aug 2026, 11:47
137,906
first reading
Engagement
467 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 139,263 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,500
430 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.832%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
430
of 467 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
467 (5 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
13,110,270
Reactions total
109,085
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 03:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
116,256 reactions across 456 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
22,438
19.3%
🤬
17,101
14.7%
❤
13,526
11.6%
👍
11,236
9.66%
😢
9,551
8.22%
🤯
7,944
6.83%
😱
6,847
5.89%
💔
4,547
3.91%
😁
2,878
2.48%
🔥
2,779
2.39%
🤝
2,112
1.82%
👌
2,101
1.81%
😭
2,089
1.80%
🕊
1,502
1.29%
💯
1,325
1.14%
👀
1,249
1.07%
👏
1,058
0.91%
✍
937
0.806%
🤔
861
0.741%
🐳
859
0.739%
16 further kinds
3,316
2.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 467 of the 467 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 467 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
68
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 467 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mlnrlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 467 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.28%
20 of 467 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
20
posts carrying an erid · 18 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
30,500
over 20 measured posts
Median views · rest
32,200
over 447 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxjQNiF
3
17 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VtzqucVvBV
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
2Vtzque5thy
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
2Vtzqvdp587
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2Vtzqvdv95u
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
2VtzqvfEPQF
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
2Vtzqvgnje3
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VtzqviERyV
1
4 September 2026
4 September 2026
2VtzqvqtjXR
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2VtzqvqvTSj
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2VtzqwCcAMq
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
2VtzqwGwsHU
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 6 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 467 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
⛈ Непогода в ЛНР задержится и ночью.
Местами — ливни, грозы, град и ветер до 15-20 м/с.
Связаны ли нынешние перебои со светом ещё и с погодой — пока неизвестно, но всё возможно.
Поэтому лучше заранее зарядить телефоны и пауэрбанки. Как обычно.
А если напряжение проседает и стабилизатора нет — чувствительную технику пока стоит отключить.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
⚡️Отключения света в ЛНР связаны с аварией в энергосистеме соседнего региона.
Энергетики работают с ночи и пытаются стабилизировать систему. Работы ведутся в круглосуточном режиме.
Ситуацию дополнительно осложняют удары по объектам энергетики ЛНР, сообщили в Правительстве ЛНР.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
❗️ Четыре человека пострадали при массированной атаке БПЛА на Ростов.
Пятилетний мальчик и его мама остаются в больнице — их состояние оценивают как средней тяжести. Ещё двое пострадавших лечатся амбулаторно.
В городе и области повреждены многоквартирные и частные дома, административные здания и машины. Обломками одного из дронов повредило локомотив пассажирского поезда.
Дроны были начинены металлическими шариками…
❗️В Луганске ищут пропавшую Наталью Омельченко.
1 сентября она вышла из дома на ул. Войкова в Каменнобродском районе и до сих пор не вернулась.
Была одета в жёлтую кофту и синие джинсы.
Если вы видели женщину или знаете, где она может находиться, звоните:
📞+7(959)212-89-62
📞+7(959)129-54-82
Просьба распространить.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
❗️ВСУ атаковали спасателей МЧС в Северодонецке.
Повреждена пожарная автоцистерна.
Личный состав успел отойти на безопасное расстояние — никто не пострадал.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
⚡️Семь человек ранены из-за ударов ВСУ по ЛНР.
➖ В Славяносербском округе БПЛА атаковал легковой автомобиль, пострадали двое мужчин.
➖ В Свердловске враг прицельно ударил по строителям и спецтехнике в районе строящегося моста. Ранены трое работников.
➖ Несколько ударов в г.о Северодонецк. Неонацисты ударили в районе супермаркета, ранен пожилой мужчина.
➖ Ещё один удар пришёлся вблизи жилого дома — ранена 68-летня…
🤷♂️ Тем временем на Левченко «Малинки, Малинки», сообщают читатели.
Тревога по БПЛА сохраняется.
1:26 Вроде бы тихо. По всем параметрам.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
⚡️ В Луганске частично пропал свет.
Больше всего сообщений поступает из Артёмовского района.
О перебоях также пишут жители Каменнобродского района, Юбилейного, Александровска, Тепличного.
На востоке города жители отмечают скачки напряжения — местами выше 250 В.
На всякий случай держите телефоны и повербанки заряженными.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
⚡️ На Юбилейном частично пропал свет.
Местные жители сообщают о возможном происшествии на энергообъекте и зареве.
Связано ли это с боевыми действиями — пока неизвестно.
Тем временем в Луганске объявлена тревога по БПЛА, сообщают мониторинги.
доп. Электричество на Юбилейном постепенно возвращается.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
💡Жители сразу нескольких районов сообщают, что электричество заметно мигнуло.
Также пишут, что где-то был слышен бах.
Что именно произошло — пока неизвестно, но лучше зарядить все устройства.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
😳 Вода хлещет из опоры ЛЭП на Советской в Луганске.
Загадочное и, скорее всего, опасное явление заметили местные. По их словам, новый источник появился после замены асфальта на тротуаре и установки новых столбов
— пишет Mash на Донбассе.
Среди версий — повреждённая труба, проблемы с водоотведением или грунтовые воды.
⚡️ Подписаться | 🗯 Прислать новость
📲 Читать в MAX
🐳60❤32🤔26🤯24😱16🙏14👍8😢8
Showing the 12 most recent of 467 posts we hold for @mlnrlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mlnrlive edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЛУГАНСКВОДА @NRlcjA4mJcowM2Uy · 32,613 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
ИНЦИДЕНТ ЛУГАНСК | ЛНР @incidentLNR_Lugansk · 103,195 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
Новые Регионы | Новости | ЛНР | ДНР | Херсон | Запорожье @novostlnr · 49,348 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
🇷🇺181.RU | ЛНР 🅉 INFO | НОВОСТИ ЛУГАНСКА🇷🇺 @ru181lnr · 60,579 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
ЛУГАНСК СЕГОДНЯ⚡️ЛНР | ДОНБАСС @luhansktoday · 67,139 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
НОВОСТИ ЛНР @luganskallnews · 76,584 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
Известия ЛНР/ДНР, Луганск/Донецк @obstanovkalnr · 102,350 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 August 2026
ЛуганскИнформЦентр Z @LIC_LPR · 48,744 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Прилеты Резерв @prilet_lugansk · 7 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Вечерний Луганск @vecherniylugansk · 95,157 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 16 August 2026
ДМ | Донбасс Медиа @DM_Donbass_Medi · 39,452 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
🔴 Алчевские новости 🔴 @newZalch · 32,660 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
Вакансии в ЛНР @rabota_lnrr · 44,574 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Мой Энергосбыт @e_sbt · 96,776 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 August 2026
Работа в Луганске @vakansii_luganske_lnr · 36,268 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 1 September 2026
ПСБ @psbbank · 86,621 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
ЛУГАНЩИНА ОПЕРАТИВНА @Operativ_luga_channel · 44,446 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Донбасский Кейс @donbasscase · 70,431 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МЛНР LIVE ЛУГАНСК | НОВОСТИ” (@mlnrlive), 139,263 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlnrlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.