Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💐马来西亚@MLXY💐

Channel

💐马来西亚@MLXY💐

@mlxy

3 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,476subscribers

+4,128 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002633720028
TypeChannel
Usernames@chaguan @mlxy @quanju
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held71
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mlxy

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@yatai2/194707 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC@mlxy/18235 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@mlxy/18240 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC@yatai2/194757 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@yatai2/194777 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC@mlxy/18242 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@mlxy/18243 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC@yatai2/194787 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@mlxy/18247 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC@yatai2/194827 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@yatai2/194867 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC@mlxy/18251 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@yatai27 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (52)
@dibai77 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (52)
@ytxw7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (52)
@guancha7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (52)
@yatai17 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (52)
@xigang8I87 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@xigang8I8 (61)
@feilong7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@feilong (61)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 22 of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @yatai2. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,78119,42514,60318,4767 August 20266 September 2026
71 measurements spanning 30 days, net +4,128. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,334–20,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 71
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 16:3818,476-949
4 Sept 2026, 05:5719,425+9,644
3 Sept 2026, 09:439,781-74
3 Sept 2026, 05:489,855-158
2 Sept 2026, 20:2810,013-1,209
2 Sept 2026, 03:5411,222-67
2 Sept 2026, 00:1611,289no change
1 Sept 2026, 20:4311,289-168
1 Sept 2026, 02:3811,457-168
1 Sept 2026, 00:3711,625no change
31 Aug 2026, 23:1811,625-305
31 Aug 2026, 02:4311,930no change
30 Aug 2026, 23:5211,930no change
30 Aug 2026, 23:4711,930-209
30 Aug 2026, 02:5812,139no change
30 Aug 2026, 00:5412,139-239
29 Aug 2026, 20:4512,378-237
29 Aug 2026, 00:1212,615no change
28 Aug 2026, 23:5512,615no change
28 Aug 2026, 22:3412,615first reading

Engagement

371 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.04%
avg views ÷ 18,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.4
364 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
364
of 371 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held371 (7 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total2,676
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 39m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 111 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

#柬埔寨资讯:金边警方突查涉嫌网络诈骗窝点,18名孟加拉国籍人员被拘留 9月1日 —— 据消息,当日,金边市奔格冷区行政当局在奔格冷区区长索克萨姆巴特(Sok Sambath)的带领下,会同奔格冷区警察局长及相关执法人员,对一处涉嫌与网络诈骗(Online Scam)活动有关的场所展开突击检查。 执法人员在现场进行检查并对相关区域实施封锁,同时拘留了18名孟加拉国籍人员,其中包括1名女性。 目前,相关人员及现场情况已由执法部门进一步调查,以核实是否涉及网络诈骗及其他违法活动。案件后续处理结果,有待有关部门进一步公布。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

1 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:拜林省召开安全工作会议,部署持续打击网络诈骗 9月1日,拜林省省长兼省行政统一指挥委员会主席Ban Srey Mom博士主持召开会议,总结8月份安全工作,并检查当地持续打击“网络诈骗”行动的进展情况。 会上,Ban Srey Mom表示,打击和防范网络诈骗是当前政府部门及各级执法力量最重要的工作之一,各部门必须提高警惕、加强责任落实,按照洪玛奈首相及政府的指示,采取有效措施处理网络诈骗问题。 她强调,柬埔寨目前仍将继续开展打击各类犯罪,特别是网络诈骗犯罪,进一步加强社会治安和公共秩序管理。 同时,各地要重点加强对集中居住区、外国人居住情况以及赌场等场所的检查和管理,防止外国人非法进入拜林省居住,并从源头上预防各类犯罪,尤其是网络诈骗。 会议期间,Ban Srey Mom还肯定了省行政统一指挥委员会和各地政府过去一段时间的工作表现,认为相关部门在维护治安、处理群众问题以及提供公共服务方面都投入了较大力度,并

1 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#币圈资讯:火币HTX突遭DDoS猛攻,黑客高调认领点名孙宇晨,币安此前已限制相关转账 8月31日,火币HTX遭遇DDoS攻击。孙宇晨随后确认平台服务已经恢复,用户资产未受影响,HTX已保存相关证据并向执法部门报案。 同一天,X账号“Hacker_Fuckvc”公开认领此次攻击,并直接点名孙宇晨,称此次出手是为了给他“一个教训”。 这次攻击发生之际,HTX与币安之间的资金往来本身已经受到限制。 币安早在8月14日就宣布,从8月23日起限制涉及HTX、EXMO等11家加密平台的相关交易。用户通过币安直接或间接向这些平台转账,交易可能被暂扣审查,相关钱包也可能受到限制。 币安此前给出的原因是监管和合规要求,这项限制早于此次DDoS攻击生效,并不是黑客攻击发生后临时采取的措施。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:http

1 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC2 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#柬埔寨资讯:西港查获疑似网络诈骗设备,10名中国籍人员被捕 8月31日,根据省政府省长指示,西哈努克市行政指挥部在西哈努克省法院检察官协调下,对位于西哈努克省西哈努克市第四分区第五村同一街区的3栋公寓楼开展公开检查行动。 行动期间,执法人员重点检查涉嫌网络诈骗及外国人非法居住等情况,并查获一批疑似与网络诈骗活动有关的电子设备及物品。 据介绍,专家工作组现场查获的相关证据包括: 笔记本电脑4台; 手机118部; iPad 1台。 此次行动中,当局共逮捕10名中国籍人员,其中包括2名女性。 根据初步调查,10人中有4人涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动,其中1人同时涉嫌非法居住;另外6人为涉嫌非法居住人员,其中包括2名女性。 目前,被捕的10名中国籍人员及相关证据物品,已被移送至西哈努克省警察总部,接受进一步讯问和调查。案件后续处理情况仍有待有关部门公布。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 htt

1 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC2 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#群友爆料:西港星际赌场168团队下面出码的,真的会玩,玩了老板,玩客户,吃原告,吃被告。 到底是赌场出码老板知情,还是这样是出码的基本操作?没规矩,没格局的做法。收客户钱,安排客户走,客户家里面多转的钱黑了别个的,赚自己该赚的,不是你的说霸道。动不动要别人死,看你好粗的大腿,讲霸道出生不去搞老板,搞客户千来块钱。 最后这点钱先通知你,明天之前退出来。今天最后给你留点脸,发点文字板,打马赛克,不想好聚好散,我们就鱼死网破。 这文字板随便发点,最后给你一点脸。想玩臭,那就乱搞。钱没还回来,我明天给你发点你说的语音,就喜欢你不在乎。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

1 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

#柬埔寨资讯:外籍人士被勒索500美元罚款案:两名涉案官员一人停职、一人开除 关于向外籍人士强行索要500美元罚款一案,两名涉案官员已于8月31日受到处理:其中一名名为 Hor Phally 的三级警司(上尉)交通警察被暂停职务;另一名名为 Sim Ratha 的合同制工作人员则被开除公职。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

1 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC3 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#柬妹吐槽:我那个中国籍男友,几乎每天都要我给他买东西。大多是一些像买香烟之类的小钱,但日积月累下来,数目真的非常惊人。 我知道大家可能会纳闷,为什么我要一直给他掏钱?但我发誓,我真的百般不愿意。 我也尝试过拒绝,但每次都以失败告终。只要我一说不,他就会用话术PUA我,比如“我整天的心情都被你毁了”或者“你就不能对我好这一次吗?”。每次听到这些话,我都觉得特别自责,搞得好像全是我的错一样。 有一次我实在不想给他买,他就指责我不关心他,甚至在我上班时间发信息轰炸,一直把我逼到在岗位上哭出来。 我绝没有夸大其词,这种事每天都在发生。有时他大清早就把我吵醒,要拿我的银行卡去买他想要的东西。如果我拒绝,他就会大发雷霆,重复那些话继续缠着我,直到我点头他才肯放我睡觉。导致我好几次都是在严重缺觉、精疲力竭的状态下去上班。 他一直没有工作,全靠我打全职赚钱。我真心觉得他对于赚钱和花钱根本没有任何概念。 好几次我省吃俭用存下一小笔应

1 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC6 viewsread 1 September 2026
Forwarded from @bbbb342424Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️全球直登 ⚡️BBIN 联合迪威娱乐城 联手打造优质娱乐平台! ⚡️支持 微信 支付宝 银行卡 充值 ⚡️支持 USDT ABA 充值 ⚡️支持 波币 NO钱包 购宝 多种钱包 充值 ⚡️24小时存取不打烊 ⚡️充值提现实时到账 🧂⚽️🏀🏈⚾️🥎🎾🏐 ⚡️官方频道: @diwei4 ⚡️官方客服: @diwei2 ⚡️官方代理:@diwei3 ⚡️官方网址: diwei.app ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️

1 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC4 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

柬埔寨今日恢复最严交通执法! 昨天,柬埔寨国家警察总署副总监泽哈宣布,自9月1日起,执法人员将在金边市、西港、实居省、干拉省和柴桢省严查交通违规并正式实施罚款。 泽哈指出,2026年上半年全国交通事故及伤亡人数均有所上升,其中超速驾驶占比达46%,为事故首要诱因;忽视优先通行权及酒驾亦属高危行为。 目前,柬埔寨警方正持续开展全国酒驾专项整治,呼吁驾驶员严格遵守交通法规,共同降低事故发生率。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

1 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC4 viewsread 1 September 2026
Video

#网友投稿:今天中午波贝宪兵队展开突击检查,连同当地人的民房一并纳入排查范围,还在波贝打野的注意了,看这样子不像是和你们开玩笑的。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

1 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC5 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

缅甸佤邦再次向中方移交52名中国公民 据缅甸佤邦方面消息,8月31日,佤邦向中方移交52名非法进入当地的中国公民。相关人员此前在当地开放自愿返乡登记后主动登记,由佤邦工作人员统一护送至中缅边境,随后移交中国警方处理。 这是佤邦自8月以来第三批向中方移交中国籍人员。8月24日,佤邦向中方移交56人;8月26日,又移交72名涉嫌电信网络诈骗的中国公民。加上此次移交的52人,三批人员共计180人。 佤邦方面表示,目前当地仍在持续清查没有合法手续进入当地的中国公民,并为相关人员提供主动登记返乡渠道。符合条件的人员可主动登记,登记完成后由佤邦方面统一护送至中缅边境,再移交中方处理。 据佤邦方面公布的数据,2026年以来,佤邦已累计向中方移交1261名非法进入当地的中国公民;自2020年以来,累计移交人数已达88716人。 佤邦方面提醒,相关人员返回中国后,如需再次进入当地,须按照正规出入境程序办理手续,不得通过非法渠道进入。

1 Sept 2026, 13:50 UTC5 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#群友反馈:西港海之港充值失败已经装车载走了,看样子抓了不少人。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8

Showing the 12 most recent of 371 posts we hold for @mlxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💐马来西亚@MLXY💐” (@mlxy), 18,476 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mlxy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.