Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mark Minervini Tweets

Channel

Mark Minervini Tweets

@mmtweets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

266subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001905754524
TypeChannel
Username@mmtweets
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mmtweets

Growth

265266265.57 August 2026 — 265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 265 subscribers13 September 2026 — 266 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 37 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 265–266 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 19:55266+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:01265no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:41265first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026

@DoomDotOrg Lol August 8, 2026 at 12:20AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085868738994229687

7 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

Some investors took comfort in the fact that Cathie Wood was buying Skillz and continued adding to her position as it fell. Throughout 2021, her ETFs aggressively accumulated millions of shares during the decline, convinced they were buying a disruptive growth company at bargain https://t.co/5UkmfaWHwh August 7, 2026 at 03:42PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085738254725173469

7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

@hauntingangel13 @Mattaverse21 Lol! And I could tell you the winning lottery number in hindsight. August 7, 2026 at 02:30PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085720310188306503

7 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

You only here this nonsense in roaring bull markets. August 7, 2026 at 01:59PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085712433071423727

7 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

@kiki_toolazy For those who don't know, fpr years in the 90s, Soros Management was my consulting client. There's those of us who talk from experience. And then there's those who talk out of their ass. August 7, 2026 at 01:58PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085712070654267501

7 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

@dynamictrader2 @StonkCrab No, it's like two cars arguing... one has brakes, the other one doesn't, and the one without brakes says he's never gonna crash. August 7, 2026 at 01:55PM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085711422638432525

7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026

No, it's not!I can't believe how many people still think changing the label somehow changes the math. Calling it an "investment" instead of a "trade" doesn't make a loss any smaller or improve the odds of recovery. A 50% loss is still a 50% loss.Just because you intend to https://t.co/XM0c2LRM3z August 7, 2026 at 11:12AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085670357780873251

7 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

@TrendTraderrr @robertlu94134 True... for most. We do hope you become a member, but there will be hours of learning. August 7, 2026 at 08:29AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085629328759370083

7 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

@JTrade_11 Just a sales pitch? No. Are we selling my platform? Yes. But you will learn. August 7, 2026 at 08:23AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085627893015540119

7 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026

@__Wait_for_it_ @Kente_Clarke 👍 August 7, 2026 at 05:06AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085578346981695686

7 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026

@__Wait_for_it_ @Kente_Clarke I'm not saying I never use chatgpt. But when I do, I tell it specifically to keep my writing as is and not to change it, but to only suggest major grammatical error changes. And even then, I rewrite it myself again. I wrote three books before chatgpt was available. I think August 7, 2026 at 02:56AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085545629388873954

7 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026

@oneluv4329 @Kente_Clarke Pre chatGpt 😇🙏 August 7, 2026 at 02:51AM https://twitter.com/markminervini/status/2085544346602950930

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mmtweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mark Minervini Tweets” (@mmtweets), 266 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mmtweets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.