Channel
@mndctt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
357subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002009562843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mndctt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mndctt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 357 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 362 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 364 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 366 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 368 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 368 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
来自速搜推荐 @SSOU 📢欧博正盘 亚星正盘 欧博... 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢人妖-伪娘-TS精选 📢利博代理 利博官网 真人... 📢MelonsTube大奶... 📢蘋蘋澎澎PINPINPO... 📢2026世界杯 世界杯赛... 📢全球接码平台- 180 ... 📢欧博官网 亚星官网 皇冠... 📢PA代理 PA官网 PA... 📢百家乐/真人电子/新盛博... 📢AV黑丝美腿中出每日新片 📢《体彩》足彩|NBA篮球... 📢H动漫 里番 3D 📢芭提雅修车 芭提雅上门 👉流量互推规则介绍💥 以下是广告推荐 📢 TeleTop 中文索引 ✅【铂莱娱乐bolai.com】8年老台 世界杯指定投注平台 全网上押1300万u 📢XX789🔞成人资源一站式导航 🚀蓝图数据🚀SDK+DPI｜106通道技术分析全行业💰技术实力诚邀合作🔥 📢💹567U时代火爆上线！招收玩家/代理，匿名开户，放心娱乐！ 🇨🇳 简…
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
🚀帮助您找到感兴趣的群组、频道和机器人 📊频道分析 📢官方频道
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mndctt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 21 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mndctt named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“街拍美女大长腿夏日清凉火辣性感🧜♀️👠” (@mndctt), 357 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mndctt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.