Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧

Channel

🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧

@mnogougolniki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

860subscribers

-9,762 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354704230
TypeChannel
Username@mnogougolniki
Created20 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mnogougolniki

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

86011,0285,9446 August 2026 — 10,622 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,622 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,619 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,611 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,606 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,601 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,598 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,594 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,580 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,579 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,572 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,569 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,568 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,565 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,562 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,563 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,568 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,764 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,850 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,985 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,011 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,028 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,025 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,023 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,017 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,022 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,023 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,014 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,018 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,016 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,010 subscribers19 September 2026 — 860 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -9,762. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:38860-10,150
17 Sept 2026, 00:3711,010-6
15 Sept 2026, 00:3711,016-2
13 Sept 2026, 11:1711,018+4
11 Sept 2026, 18:3511,014-9
5 Sept 2026, 22:5911,023+1
3 Sept 2026, 19:5811,022+5
2 Sept 2026, 11:5311,017-6
1 Sept 2026, 13:3811,023-2
31 Aug 2026, 16:1811,025-3
30 Aug 2026, 13:3711,028+17
29 Aug 2026, 16:4611,011+26
28 Aug 2026, 19:0210,985+135
27 Aug 2026, 18:5610,850+86
26 Aug 2026, 20:0310,764+196
25 Aug 2026, 18:2310,568+5
24 Aug 2026, 16:5810,563+1
23 Aug 2026, 03:0210,562-3
21 Aug 2026, 16:4510,565-3
20 Aug 2026, 16:1510,568first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
221.6%
avg views ÷ 860 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,910
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held49 (30 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total28,580
Reactions total2,040
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,655 reactions across 49 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54607130017220596801,22716.0%
1,04113.6%
🫡1,03413.5%
🤡83010.8%
🔥5917.72%
custom 54609959799373246864746.19%
😁4575.97%
👍3905.09%
🤬3885.07%
🕊2122.77%
🍾2112.76%
🗿1501.96%
custom 53885965236825095991401.83%
😡1311.71%
👏771.01%
😭740.967%
custom 5280809938522758615440.575%
😢380.496%
👎340.444%
330.431%
11 further kinds791.03%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 49 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mnogougolniki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 20:05 UTC≈1,110 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пока что президент поздравил с днём рождения админа и напомнил, что стоит заказать плакат с ним для стабилизации политической обстановки

46🤡8custom 54607130017220596808custom 54609959799373246864🏆1👎1🗿1

1 Sept 2026, 20:01 UTC≈1,190 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❗️❗️❗️Путин вышел для заявлений

😁31🤡10custom 54607130017220596808custom 546099597993732468642🙈2🗿1😢1

1 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC≈1,190 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚡️Владимир Путин сейчас выйдет к прессе и сделает несколько важных заявлений — журналисты Кремлевского пула Многоугольники на OZON

🔥51🤡19custom 54607130017220596805🤔4🙉2custom 54609959799373246862🗿1

1 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,290 views171 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

122😁32custom 54607130017220596807custom 52808099385227586154custom 54609959799373246864🗿1🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,220 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Друзья, спасибо за поздравления! Если хотите поддержать проект, можете заказать плакаты из нашего ассортимента: https://ozon.ru/s/mnogougolniki!

19custom 54607130017220596808🗿2custom 54609959799373246862🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,380 views240 reactions10 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Админу сегодня 23 года! Многоугольники на OZON

🔥16531custom 546071300172205968020🍾96🫡3🎉2custom 54609959799373246862

1 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,580 views173 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

1 сентября 1939 года началась Вторая Мировая война

🫡140custom 546071300172205968017custom 546099597993732468694🗿21

30 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,800 views108 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 546071300172205968061custom 5460995979937324686347🔥2🙏2🍾1🗿1

27 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈2,770 views175 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗️Меня вообще не беспокоит, что Россия нападёт на НАТО — Трамп Многоугольники на OZON

116😁25custom 546071300172205968015custom 54609959799373246867🤡6🗿4🫡2

27 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,670 views206 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗️Россия и Армения больше не стратегические союзники — Пашинян Премьер рассказал, что Россия больше не упоминается в роли стратегического партнёра в программе правительства на 2026-2031 годы Причиной тому Пашинян назвал, что Москва "не выполнила свои договорные обязательства как союзник по ОДКБ в 2022 году" Многоугольники на OZON

🤡136👎18😁18custom 5460713001722059680109👍4😢3😭3

27 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈2,130 views178 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Помогите мне, русские люди, спасти Родину 🇷🇺27 августа 1878 года родился Пётр Николаевич Врангель Барон Пётр Николаевич Врангель — один из самых известных военачальников и ключевых руководителей Белого движения в годы Гражданской войны. Происходя из старинного аристократического рода, он был блестящим кавалеристом, участником Русско-японской и Первой мировой войн, заслужив репутацию храброго офицера. В апреле 1920

custom 5460713001722059680102custom 54609959799373246862624👍10🤡5👎4🔥2🗿2

26 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈2,350 views130 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Вчера в многоугольном аккаунте instagram* мы опубликовали видео с Михаилом Дроздовским, предполагаем, что последний раз генерал был так же сильно популярен где-то в 1917 году) *–деятельность компании Meta признана экстремистской на территории РФ

😁72custom 546071300172205968044custom 546099597993732468685🗿1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @mnogougolniki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,680 voters approx.

Доверяете ли вы Пескову?

  1. Да33%
  2. Нет48%
  3. Не знаю19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTCAnonymous Poll901 voters

Как вы относитесь к Григорию Явлинскому?

  1. Положительно22%
  2. Нейтрально50%
  3. Негативно27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTCAnonymous Poll861 voters

Смотрели ли вы Одиссею?

  1. Да, понравилась7%
  2. Да, не понравилась2%
  3. Нет, но планирую28%
  4. Нет и не планирую64%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FTF
@tactical_flava · 29,941
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 16 September 2026
Black History
@history_0x · 43,129
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Гостович 🎖
@ghostovich · 22,743
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 20 September 2026
Мудреныч
@moodrenych · 25,523
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
War Thunder | RU
@warthunderru · 85,158
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧” (@mnogougolniki), 860 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mnogougolniki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.