Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mofka Brothers

Channel

Mofka Brothers

@mofkabrothers

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,416subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001217258580
TypeChannel
Username@mofkabrothers
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mofkabrothers

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,2965,4165,3566 August 2026 — 5,303 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,303 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,302 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,296 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,301 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,310 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,329 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,339 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,352 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,370 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,381 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,374 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,372 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,416 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,278–5,434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 21:365,416+44
13 Sept 2026, 06:165,372-2
8 Sept 2026, 22:165,374-7
3 Sept 2026, 16:145,381+11
31 Aug 2026, 10:265,370+18
28 Aug 2026, 07:075,352+13
25 Aug 2026, 05:255,339+10
22 Aug 2026, 13:475,329+19
19 Aug 2026, 04:555,310+9
15 Aug 2026, 20:485,301+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:535,296-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:305,302-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:305,303no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:285,303first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

529 reactions across 22 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳529100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mofkabrothers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,010 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

فیس خودمو در اف سی اسکن کردم

🐳20

Signed Barsam

8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,010 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🥇سومین قدم فلاح در FC27 (فصل ۱) فلاح لینک ویدیو 👇 https://www.instagram.com/mofkabrothers

🐳12

Signed Barsam

4 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈2,180 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

مود جدید جهان باز FC27 🔥⭐️ (فلاح برگردون زن باشد؟) لایویم همین الان kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers

🐳18

Signed Barsam

4 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,430 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

به بهونه تریلر grounds بیایم استریم دور هم ببینیم؟

🐳29

Signed Barsam

2 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈2,420 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

لایویم همین الان تریلر آلتیمیت تیم اف سی 27 🔥⭐️ kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers ———————————— @mofkabrothers @mofkafifa

🐳14

Signed Barsam

2 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,630 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اونایی که اینستا رو دارن میدونن امروز استریمیم

🐳26

Signed Barsam

2 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC≈1,630 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🐳22

Signed Barsam

2 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,500 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🐳18

Signed Barsam

31 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,950 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چرا نظرم راجع به FC27 عوض شد

🐳21

Signed Barsam

31 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,880 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🥇دومین قدم فلاح در FC27 (فصل ۱) فلاح لینک ویدیو 👇 https://www.instagram.com/mofkabrothers

🐳19

Signed Barsam

31 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC≈1,940 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

گول خوردم اف سی ۲۷ نظرمو داره عوض میکنه

🐳38

Signed Barsam

29 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,900 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mofkafifaPhoto

برووو بریم برای اولین تریلر گیم پلی FC27 ⭐️ لایویم همین الان kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers kick.com/mofkabrothers ———————————— @mofkabrothers @mofkafifa

🐳15

Signed Barsam

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mofkabrothers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ALIZELZELE
@alizelzelee · 29,659
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
🎮 FC27 | EAFC IR 🎮
@EAFC_IR · 1,133,756
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 11 August 2026
سم اسنو
@Samsnowww · 22,425
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
AmirEyZed 🍌
@amireyzed · 41,327
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
سهیل سلبا
@solbasoheil · 139,223
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Shelter DNS | شلتر
@sheltertm · 255,866
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 11 August 2026
عمو تئوری
@TheoAmoory · 59,030
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026
بنیامین
@Thebeniamin · 174,417
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
🎮 EAFC27 | FC27 🎮
@EAFC_PRIME · 1,926,460
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
⚡️Mahdi Abshahi⚡️
@mahdiabshahi · 38,162
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mofka Brothers” (@mofkabrothers), 5,416 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mofkabrothers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.