Microsoft Certified Generative AI and Agentic AI Course | With Production Grade Projects and AI Labs https://youtu.be/fcFGX1up3l0

Channel
Fraz
@mohammadfrazTG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,145subscribers
-196 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001391085537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mohammadfrazTG |
| Description | Link to the YouTube channel https://youtube.com/channel/UC81Q2wnuk5KqOFVgAbq4nUw |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mohammadfrazTG |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 32,145 | -29 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 32,174 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:28 | 32,188 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:46 | 32,199 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 32,217 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 32,222 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 32,223 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 32,229 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 32,235 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 32,227 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 32,233 | -27 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 32,260 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 32,266 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 32,280 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 32,279 | -11 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 32,290 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 32,303 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 32,312 | -14 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 32,326 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 32,340 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.0%
- avg views ÷ 32,145 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,220
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (13 March 2026 – 25 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,650 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 13:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 48
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 555
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Earn 1Lac/Month in College | Step by Step Freelancing Roadmap 2026 https://youtu.be/gZSPVkn3u5k
NO Coding and 3LPA to 50LPA Remote Job in AI | Revealing the most Practical AI Roadmap https://youtu.be/-GwI-RB9AHQ
Reality of my 80LPA Salary after TAXES in Dubai vs India https://youtu.be/nWGWcjT-Yho
How to Become an Ethical Hacker in 2026 | Roadmap, Salaries & Live Hacking https://youtu.be/KxOnZeFa9ts
DON'T Buy a Laptop in 2026 Until You Watch This! 🛑 (Students Beware) https://youtu.be/M-t5Y0LrfuA
Why You Should Still Learn CODING in 2026 to Get a JOB? https://youtu.be/G7ziLApUaEw
https://youtu.be/9tlsHKAoPkY?si=S9mgY22tylUS-gnD
Guys, let’s make some projects using Google Antigravity? It will be like 4 days free course on YouTube
- Yess, maza aaega89%
- No, bahot jagah se seekh liya14%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Launching Free Generative AI Course with Industry-Grade Projects and Latest Tools https://youtu.be/XQzi17xuXHk
Future of IT Job Market and AI | 3 Data Backed Predictions https://youtu.be/RxeIgJUlWAk
In which language you want to do DSA
- Java66%
- CPP38%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @mohammadfrazTG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Guys, let’s make some projects using Google Antigravity? It will be like 4 days free course on YouTube
- Yess, maza aaega89%
- No, bahot jagah se seekh liya14%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
In which language you want to do DSA
- Java66%
- CPP38%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 25 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@goyalarsh · 192,792#1
@WeMakeDevs · 24,559#2
@kirat_internal_group · 26,689#3
@Trickyman2 · 153,010#4
@vijaykushal · 56,520#5
@Viralveda · 3,181 (as read 5 September 2026)#6
@deeporia · 936 (as read 5 September 2026)#7
@arunchauhanofficial · 55,434#8
@freshershunt · 279,122#9
@placify100 · 6,220#10
@internfreak · 58,490#11
@sanketbackend · 4,532#12
@gocareers · 79,551#13
@codeslearningTG · 272,382#14
@Unlocked_Coding · 45,530#15
@helloworldbyprince · 12,345#16
@Job_Opportunity_Experienced_Pro · 3,487#17
@TorchBearerr · 18,705#18
@namastedevreactlive · 4,394#19
@geeksforgeeks_official · 17,747#20
@jobbytesdaily · 2,863 (as read 5 September 2026)#21
@dsacpvivek · 12,383#22
@OceanOfJobs · 20,332#23
@crackingthecodinginterview · 52,238#24
@TechUprise_Updates · 51,007#25
@webdevcoursefree · 79,485#26
@jobsvacancynew · 67,124#27
@bigdataspecialist · 26,547#28
@HelpEachOtherToGetJob · 23,790#29
@Programming_experts · 67,520#30
@ritikumari · 8,384#31
@goclasses_cse · 15,745#32
@udemylibre · 6,158#33
@tcs_nqt_resources · 104,788#34
@connectarpit · 2,987#35
@akashthedeveloper · 11,470#36
@job4fresherss · 323,536#37
@PLACEMENTLELO · 155,853#38
@Techvine · 5,567#39
@rohit_negi_family · 6,983#40
@way2freshers · 112,235#41
@thecodeskool · 7,359#42
@cseintern · 762#43
@thebetterjobs · 2,788#44
@gateda2026 · 9,736#45
@gateoverflow_broadcast · 4,840#46
@fresherearth · 12,505#47
@UrExamBuddy · 13,920#48
@SICvision4jobs · 1,412#49
@offcampus_phodenge · 65,074#50
@esicachannel · 7,544#51
@codeforces_official · 73,150#52
@webdev_trainings · 133,843#53
@udemyrip · 67,840#54
@JavaScript_Trainings · 96,898#55
@ViralVeda_a · 1,242 (as read 5 September 2026)#56
@ready_dot_code · 8,456#57
@sdonics30 · 12,192#58
@Studyfever_in · 1,955#59
@govt_jobs_updates_upsc · 12,289#60
@threejsbybrunosimon · 5,938#61
@Allcodingsolution · 10,656#62
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aman_dhattarwal · 34,451
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 3 September 2026
@placementducatindia · 35,690
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
@learnnew3 · 48,101
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@goyalarsh · 192,792
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
@vijaykushal · 56,520
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
@SkillsPW · 36,913
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 1 September 2026
@jobsvacancynew · 67,124
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
@codeslearningTG · 272,382
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Trickyman2 · 153,010
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
@arunchauhanofficial · 55,434
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
@offcampus_phodenge · 65,074
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fraz” (@mohammadfrazTG), 32,145 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohammadfrazTG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.