10 measurements spanning 26 days, net +877. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,512–8,801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 20:37
8,555
-57
30 Aug 2026, 11:13
8,612
-40
27 Aug 2026, 08:34
8,652
+93
23 Aug 2026, 22:14
8,559
+278
20 Aug 2026, 04:35
8,281
+237
17 Aug 2026, 13:58
8,044
+16
14 Aug 2026, 13:53
8,028
-50
11 Aug 2026, 02:41
8,078
+417
8 Aug 2026, 00:04
7,661
-17
7 Aug 2026, 09:33
7,678
first reading
Engagement
158 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.52%
avg views ÷ 8,555 subscribers
Avg views / post
558
145 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.412%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
145
of 158 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 141 of 145 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
158 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
80,890
Reactions total
330
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 07s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
361 reactions across 154 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
248
68.7%
👍
56
15.5%
👎
31
8.59%
😁
12
3.32%
👏
3
0.831%
💩
3
0.831%
😱
3
0.831%
🤮
3
0.831%
😍
1
0.277%
🥰
1
0.277%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 154 of the 158 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 158 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 158 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moiiPC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 158 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В доменах .ru и .рф разрешили полностью кириллические адреса почты
Координационный центр национального домена сети Интернет заявил, что теперь в контактных данных вместо mail@пример.рф можно писать почта@пример.рф. Обновление уже реализовал Технический центр Интернет, который отвечает за зоны .ru и .рф.
Формально это ничего не ломает – кириллица была принята в стандарты EAI и SMTPUTF8 еще в 2012 году, так что любые…
Отказ от дисков позволит снизить стоимость PlayStation 6 ниже $1000
Так считает эксперт Ampere Analysis Пирс Хардинг-Роллс, специализирующийся на рынке видеоигр. С учетом того, что Sony твердо намерена отказаться от дисков до 2028 года, PlayStation 6 скорее всего выйдет полностью цифровой. Это позволит избежать расходов на производство дисков и дисководов, что поможет удержать цену на консоль ниже психологической от…
Intel: Core Ultra 400 заточены под десктопы, есть планы на чипы до 2030 года
Вице-президент Intel Роберт Халлок сообщил в интервью, что «когда мы думаем о нашей собственной дорожной карте, у нас есть новое ядро. Оно в первую очередь предназначено для настольных компьютеров. Я надеюсь, энтузиасты сами сделают нужные выводы. И это все, что я скажу». Иными словами, будущие Nova Lake затачиваются под десктопы, где позиц…
Насколько же Microsoft в отчаянии, раз обратилась к чистке автозагрузки
Компания в последние месяцы обещает сделать Windows 11 снова великой: планируется отказ от веб-элементов в пользу нативного WinUI, ускорение запуска приложений путем задирания частоты процессора и снижение уровня внедрения ИИ.
При этом Microsoft вполне официально дает советы, которые у многих пользователей ПК вызовут лишь улыбку: аккаунт поддер…
AMD EXPO ULL – бессмысленный профиль
Известный немецкий оверклокер Der8auer решил проверить, имеет ли смысл покупать еще более дорогие модули DDR5 с поддержкой профилей EXPO Ultra Low Latency. По данным AMD, это расширение для EXPO, которое дополнительно снижает тайминги и может докинуть еще несколько процентов производительности.
Использовался комплект G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo XRGB DDR5-6000 CL30 EXPO ULL и аналогич…
Белый дом готовит армию хакеров
Дональд Трамп подписал меморандум, поручающий создать программу для привлечения частных компаний к наступательным кибероперациям против иностранных преступных организаций. Операции будут проводиться по указанию и под контролем правительства США.
Руководить программой будут назначенные Минюстом исполнительные директора, а частные компании перед заключением контрактов должны пройти про…
За год цены на память DDR5 в Германии взлетели на 386%
Такие данные получили специалисты 3DCenter, проанализировав изменение стоимости 20 наиболее популярных наборов ОЗУ DDR5. Для понимания, в прошлом месяце было 345%. Таким образом, за год цены на память текущего поколения на рынке ЕС подскочили почти в пять раз.
Больше всего подорожали комплекты большой емкости. К примеру, цена DDR5-6400 CL32 на 64 ГБ (2 × 32 ГБ)…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 158 posts we hold for @moiiPC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
"О ТОМ О СЁМ" о Xiaomi, Android и Технике @otomosem · 33,290 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
Pochinka_blog @pochinka · 82,337 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мой - ПК (IT)” (@moiiPC), 8,555 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moiiPC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.