Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مؤمن مقدادي|mo'men megdadi

Channel

مؤمن مقدادي|mo'men megdadi

@momegdadi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,995subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002088243850
TypeChannel
Username@momegdadi
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/momegdadi

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,9955,0975,0467 August 2026 — 5,097 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,096 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,086 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,077 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,072 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,065 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,057 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,051 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,043 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,033 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,023 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,009 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,995 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,980–5,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 06:154,995-14
10 Sept 2026, 11:415,009-14
4 Sept 2026, 23:595,023-10
1 Sept 2026, 17:355,033-10
29 Aug 2026, 23:065,043-8
26 Aug 2026, 18:325,051-6
24 Aug 2026, 00:385,057-8
20 Aug 2026, 02:225,065-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:125,072-5
13 Aug 2026, 11:585,077-9
10 Aug 2026, 19:145,086-10
8 Aug 2026, 05:345,096-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:465,097first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

343 reactions across 26 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13439.1%
10831.5%
🔥277.87%
😁247.00%
💯236.71%
👏123.50%
🤡92.62%
😱30.875%
🎉10.292%
👌10.292%
👎10.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

صدمتي العلمية الاولى هي لما عرفت ان المرأة ناقصة عقل وادنى تطوريآ من الرجل ومساوية للطفل وهذه حقيقة في العلم يتم تثبيت والتحقق من صدقها كل يوم مع تطور العلم

👍21

10 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC266 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

100%؟ إنه رقم قياسي جدا.في بلد "تحرير المرأة"

9👏4

9 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC261 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡6😱2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC272 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

كان الإغريق مخترعوا الديمقراطية يمنعون تصويت العبيد لأن العبد سينتخب سيده مهما كان فاسداً

👍96

8 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC366 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الجماهير في كل العالم تنجذب إلى الخطاب الذي يتضمن خاصيتين: خاصية التبسيط، وخاصية الإثارة العاطفية. ولذلك يستحيل نشر الثقافة العلمية في أي مجتمع إلا من خلال تبسيط العلوم، مع قليلاً من الخيال العلمي.

4💯2

8 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC374 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الملحدين تحاربون شئ لا يؤمنون به !! أنتم لا تحتاجون إلى نقاش فكري مع المسلمين أنتم تحتاجون إلى نقاش سيكولوجي مع طبيب نفسي

9👍2

6 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC478 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

الاكثر تتداوب. الحكومة التىكية تعلن تعميم فتح مصليات في المدارس اشارة الى عودة التدين وغياب العلمانية في الحياة العانة والمؤسسات

👍163🎉1👏1

5 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC489 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الان النقاش مباشر https://youtu.be/jy8B3FNhz7I?si=OWhzb3BcUTsWKZ3I

😁4

5 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC451 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

جاهزين https://youtu.be/jy8B3FNhz7I?is=Byu8pn0-54_KJ_MV

😁4

4 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC450 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لماذا لا يناقش الرجل الواعى النساء ؟ كثير من المتابعين يسألون: لماذا لا تردون على البنات فى التعليقات؟ ماذا تجاهل رأيها في المواضيع الجادة و تعامل دودهن كانها دعايات مدفوعة ؟ الجواب بسيط، لكنه صادم، لأنه لا يرى أن المرأة بطبيعتها مهيأة للنقاش الفكري العميق يس لأنه يكره النساء ولا لأنهن أغبياء كن لأن تركيبتها البيولوجية والعقلية مختلفة نماقا عن الرجل، والمطلوب منها طوال التاريخ ما كان التحليل انما لانفعال والاستجابة ط

👍125

4 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC437 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍20👌1

3 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC466 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إن أبرز اختلاف في القدرات العقلية بين الجنسين يتمثل في أن الرجل يبلغ درجةً أعلى من التفوق في أي مجال يتناوله مقارنةً بما تستطيع المرأة بلوغه، سواء كان ذلك المجال يتطلب تفكيرًا عميقًا، أو استدلالًا، أو خيالًا، أو حتى مجرد استخدام الحواس واليدين."

6👏3💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @momegdadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

درع الأمة
@UmahShield · 29,837
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Daniel Haqiqatjou Official
@haqiqatjou · 25,306
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
محمود ميعاري
@MahmoudMiariRT · 22,135
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
مُدونتي - مخيمر
@Mudawanti · 38,619
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
التاريخ الإسلامي
@alkelafa · 44,527
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
شؤون إسلامية - Islamic Affairs
@ArabAffairsTV · 60,577
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
شوبنهاور - سيوران
@Schopenhauer_Cioran · 24,359
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مؤمن مقدادي|mo'men megdadi” (@momegdadi), 4,995 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/momegdadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.