
Channel
Mondolibri
@mondolibri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,434subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001114869733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mondolibri |
| Description | Recensioni, anteprime libri, consigli lettura. Tutto il mondo libri racchiuso in un canale! 🚩Contatto @Leggendo_bot 🚩Gruppo @salottoletterario 🚩 Membro di @networklamusa @CanaliCulturali 📚 |
| Created | 8 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mondolibri |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:25 | 7,434 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 7,435 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 7,432 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 7,433 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 7,430 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 7,429 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 7,426 | +1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 7,425 | +6 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 7,419 | +6 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 7,413 | +5 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 7,408 | +8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 7,400 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 7,403 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:36 | 7,404 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 7,406 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 7,403 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 7,400 | +11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 7,389 | +26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 7,363 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 7,360 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 13 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.2%
- avg views ÷ 7,434 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 836
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.478%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (13 September 2025 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 836 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,250
- Videos
- ≈34
- Links
- ≈3,610
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 83.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2025 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AudiolibriFreeCopyrite · 28,292
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 September 2026
@libri_pdf_gratis · 89,354
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 August 2026
@aforismiecitazioni · 35,228
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mondolibri” (@mondolibri), 7,434 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mondolibri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.