Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психосоматика денег с Павлом Бачуриным

Channel

Психосоматика денег с Павлом Бачуриным

@money_transformator_psy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

571subscribers

+101 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002692168563
TypeChannel
Username@money_transformator_psy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/money_transformator_psy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

470571520.57 August 2026 — 470 subscribers7 August 2026 — 470 subscribers22 August 2026 — 471 subscribers29 August 2026 — 470 subscribers13 September 2026 — 571 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 455–586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 09:41571+101
29 Aug 2026, 14:34470-1
22 Aug 2026, 12:17471+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:43470no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:18470first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4236.2%
🔥3025.9%
👍1916.4%
🤔76.03%
🙏54.31%
❤‍🔥32.59%
😐32.59%
😱32.59%
👏21.72%
😢21.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026

📍Мы начинаем! 5 минут на сборы 😊

6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥🔥🔥 ЧЕРЕЗ 10 минут начинаем эфир 🔥🔥🔥 Ссылка на вход. Присоединяйтесь! https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84306862339?pwd=llvRFa5UbbpTwdJBj1VQQb3iR0bdOX.1

🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, вот ссылка на зум конференцию для повтора эфира по прокрастинации. Старт в 19.00 МСК. Приходите, будет интересно! Павел Бачурин @Transformator_psy приглашает вас на запланированную конференцию: Zoom. Тема: Конференция Zoom Павел Бачурин @Transformator_psy Время: 6 авг. 2026 07:00 PM Москва Присоединиться к конференции Zoom https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84306862339?pwd=llvRFa5UbbpTwdJBj1VQQb3iR0bdOX.1 Ссылка

5 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC32 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В общем, я решил дать этому эфиру второй шанс. И себе заодно 😁 В прошлую субботу эфир получился действительно интересным. Судя по обратной связи, сам механизм прокрастинации удалось объяснить понятно, и для многих некоторые вещи внезапно встали на свои места. А вот с технической частью Телемост решил немного поиздеваться. Кого-то выбрасывало из эфира, у кого-то подвисала связь, кто-то не смог написать комментарий,

3🔥2🙏2

5 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC28 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Вчера я задал вам вопрос: насколько вообще для вас важна тема прокрастинации и хочется ли разобраться в ней глубже. И тишина... 😁 Сначала я подумал: ну всё понятно, Павел. Народ давно победил прокрастинацию, а ты тут со своими открытиями опоздал лет на пятнадцать. А потом появилась другая мысль. Возможно, прокрастинация просто не кажется вам проблемой, с которой нужна посторонняя помощь. Ну откладываю иногда важн

🔥43👍3

4 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Насколько тема прокрастинации сейчас про вас?

  1. Она реально мешает мне двигаться вперед33%
  2. Есть несколько вещей, которые я откладываю уже давно33%
  3. Иногда бывает, но серьезной проблемой я это не считаю33%
  4. Вообще не узнаю себя в этой теме0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

4 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC34 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот уже несколько недель мы говорим здесь о прокрастинации. Вообще эта тема появилась здесь не случайно. В какой-то момент я начал замечать определённые механизмы у себя - те самые ситуации, когда прекрасно понимаешь, что нужно сделать, знаешь как, иногда на само действие нужно всего 20 минут, а ты почему-то обходишь его по кругу. Потом я стал всё чаще замечать похожее у своих клиентов. И чем больше смотрел на это

2👍2🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC39 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

3👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC68 viewsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, совсем скоро начинаю этот эфир. проходите по ссылке. буду рад увидеть вас и пообщаться! https://telemost.yandex.ru/j/34479506352605

1 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

31 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC186 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Завтра в 10:00 (МСК) проведу открытый эфир. Тема: «Прокрастинация как механизм формирования вашей судьбы» Большинство людей думают, что прокрастинация — это просто привычка откладывать дела. А что, если это гораздо более глубокий механизм? Что, если именно он незаметно определяет, какие решения приходят вам в голову, какие возможности вы замечаете, а какие даже не попадают в поле вашего внимания? На эфире разберём

2👍2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @money_transformator_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Насколько тема прокрастинации сейчас про вас?

  1. Она реально мешает мне двигаться вперед33%
  2. Есть несколько вещей, которые я откладываю уже давно33%
  3. Иногда бывает, но серьезной проблемой я это не считаю33%
  4. Вообще не узнаю себя в этой теме0%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психосоматика денег с Павлом Бачуриным” (@money_transformator_psy), 571 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money_transformator_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.