Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 962–978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 01:17
964
-4
30 Aug 2026, 05:13
968
-5
22 Aug 2026, 08:57
973
-1
15 Aug 2026, 02:18
974
-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:46
976
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:42
976
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 23 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 25s
Average length
2m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
355 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
143
40.3%
❤
110
31.0%
👍
57
16.1%
☃
22
6.20%
🙏
6
1.69%
🤔
6
1.69%
🥰
3
0.845%
🎉
2
0.563%
🤗
2
0.563%
🎄
1
0.282%
🎅
1
0.282%
🏆
1
0.282%
👏
1
0.282%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moneymakeerzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2025 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет, давно не писал сюда.
Те каналы, где мне поснимали монеты вернул, кроме одного из-за связи с одной пп.
Делаю софт для создания видео под несколько ниш по типу гайдов, психологии, философии, историй, мотивации мб. С подбором моментов по смыслу и монтажом. Включая мемы, картинки, шрифты, переходы, эмодзи и прочее, короче как делают монтажеры. Пока в стилистике аниме, потом добавлю фильмы и другие. Логику …
🎄Новогодние предсказания🫵
Всем привет✍️
Большая часть постов актуальна, особенно по теме стр, это 100% мастхев, до сих пор использую и это лучший вариант, который почти всегда спасает видео и превью, если там есть минимальный трафик для замен.
На скрине недавний пример и это намного лучше, чем тест превью от ютуба, тк пока он там соберет данные можно укатить видос в молоко и уже никаким превью его не поднять, плюс…
⛑Способы повышения РПМ и от чего он зависит.
Всем привет, сегодня поговорим про тему рпм, то есть дохода на тысячу просмотров и каким образом его можно увеличить или влиять на него.
Первое, это удержание - чем дольше человек смотрит, тем больше рекламы.
Удержание это отдельная тема и, как и любая другая, имеет бесконечный вектор для улучшения, но из простого можно использовать компиляции.
Есть версия, что за них …
🦖Нужно ли прогревать каналы и что вообще это значит? Почему ютуб не дает трафик на новый канал?
Добрый день, товарищи!
Еще 2 года назад я подробно проверил это для себя и на все это время закрыл для себя вопрос с прогревом, как это делать лучше и какой эффект.
По моим мануалам работали и арбитражники и трафферы и команды.
Сейчас разберем тему прогревов для ютуба, а так же основную ключевую ошибку и как быстро пон…
Как сделать себе бесплатный топ ии по апи?👺
Всем здаров, не так давно мне понадобился апи гемини, но я привык что апи это в основной платный продукт.
Апи это возможность связать свой код/проект с нейронкой для автоматической реализации задач.
Код напишет тебе ии, достаточно написать понятное тз и задавать вопросы, когда я делал свой первый код, то вообще за это не шарил.
Поэтому в первую очередь я полез покупать …
Доступ можно было бы получить восстановив канал, который заблокировали через апелляцию, но:
- Там уже истек срок ее подачи
- Я удалил данные сервиса ютуб с аккаунта (в итоге удалились данные только удаленного канала, а незаблокированный канал так где-то и остался - учитывайте это)
☝️В итоге, нужно получить доступ к этому каналу зайдя на другой аккаунт бренда в гугле (он был на другом аккаунт бренда, но на той же по…
🔥19❤7👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @moneymakeerzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ффринг | Вайбкодинг @aiffring · 21,661 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
С вами Даня @swamidanya · 41,056 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Слава и его Moneymaker’s” (@moneymakeerzz), 964 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneymakeerzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.