3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 539โ541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 12:44
539
-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:38
541
no change
16 Aug 2026, 04:15
541
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 22 October 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
9.37%
avg views รท 539 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
50.5%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
16 (22 October 2025 โ 9 August 2026)
Views total
101
Reactions total
51
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
438 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
87
19.9%
๐
80
18.3%
๐
70
16.0%
๐ฅฐ
70
16.0%
๐
69
15.8%
๐ฏ
14
3.20%
โคโ๐ฅ
10
2.28%
๐ฅ
9
2.05%
๐
7
1.60%
๐
6
1.37%
๐
5
1.14%
๐
2
0.457%
๐ฟ
2
0.457%
๐
2
0.457%
๐คฉ
2
0.457%
โก
1
0.228%
๐
1
0.228%
๐คฎ
1
0.228%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐ Feb 26
๐๐ง๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ก ๐ช๐๐ก APP Click Here To Login
๐ Recharge 200 -2000 Random amount code up to 1888
62FA3C273961390986B9D8B00105D0A7
๐ Recharge 2001 -10000 Random amount code up to 2888
C5962761703327A9E9DA0693DA1D20C0
๐ Recharge 10001 -30000 Random amount code up to 5888
7FC30B61BF4754453B08D2FF24CACD4C
๐ Recharge 30001-100000 Random amount code up to 18888
F13CC34146BCE721E898A4843F7DAE07
Hello dosto. Kese hai aap. Sabhi log chalo fir se start karte hai colour trading
โค7๐6๐ฅฐ5๐4๐2๐ฏ1๐ฟ1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @monitorpredictions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Shobhit Nirwan @shobhit_nirwan ยท 96,824 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 33 here โ alongside 32 others โ read 16 August 2026
GateWay Classes : AKTU @GatewaysAcademy ยท 48,404 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 51 here โ alongside 50 others โ read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โCLUB PREDICTION ๐ฑโ (@monitorpredictions), 539 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monitorpredictions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
