Ваши вещи не те, за кого себя выдают🌷 🤩Топ Весна Как вам такой лайфхак, девочки? MONO-STIL в MAX
👍11🤔10❤🔥4👏3

Channel
@monostil_ru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30,416subscribers
-294 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001718999600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monostil_ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monostil_ru |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 30,416 | -32 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 30,448 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 30,468 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:25 | 30,482 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 30,493 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 30,495 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 30,511 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 30,531 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 30,523 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 30,536 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 30,549 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 30,556 | -21 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 30,577 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 30,579 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 30,586 | -22 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 30,608 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 30,617 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 30,621 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 30,634 | -23 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 30,657 | first reading |
154 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 154 (5 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 156,142 |
| Reactions total | 3,015 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 23:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,523 reactions across 146 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,321 | 37.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,044 | 29.6% | |
| 👍 | 693 | 19.7% | |
| 😍 | 232 | 6.59% | |
| 👏 | 80 | 2.27% | |
| 💯 | 63 | 1.79% | |
| 🤔 | 38 | 1.08% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 0.539% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 0.539% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.397% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 154 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ваши вещи не те, за кого себя выдают🌷 🤩Топ Весна Как вам такой лайфхак, девочки? MONO-STIL в MAX
👍11🤔10❤🔥4👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥15😍5❤🔥2
Она действительно производит фурор ❤ Благодаря расклешению по бокам юбка мягко обтекает бедра и резко расширяется к низу, создавая тот самый эффектный «русалочий» силуэт. Длина макси вытягивает рост, а легкий шелковистый блеск ткани добавляет образу дорогой шик. Собрали для вас лучшие миксы📍 🤩Юбка Фурор + Блузка Фурор 🤩Юбка Фурор + Блузка Марта 🤩Юбка Фурор + Кардиган Галилео 🤩Юбка Фурор + Блузка Оникс 🤩Юбка Фурор …
🔥13👍7😍1
Вы — наше главное вдохновение #МоноМузы 🍒 ❤ Знаете, что нас мотивирует каждое утро? Ваши улыбки на фото, теплые слова и невероятные образы. Спасибо, что выбираете нас и делаете мир вокруг ярче! Продолжайте вдохновлять! Ждем ваши образы под постом или в соц.сетях с отметкой @monostil.ru P.S. Настроение обновляться? Новая коллекция «Песня тайги» уже доступна в наших бутиках или на онлайн на сайте MONO-STIL в MAX
🔥22❤🔥5😍5
Поговорим о том, что согревает душу? И здесь, без лишних сомнений, наш бестселлер — куртка Лакомка✨ 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Топ Ирис + Юбка Астория 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Топ Ирис + Брюки Пиксель 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Блузка Манго + Джинсы Филип 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Блузка Манго + Брюки Пиксель 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Футболка Дева + Юбка Астория 🔴Куртка Лакомка + Футболка Дева + Брюки Сига Тандем шерсти с кашемиром — это материал, котор…
🔥16👍9😍5
Глава 3 — Песня тайги📍 Осень уже коснулась плеч, но мы слышим дальше — туда, где шумят вершины и прячется тепло. Новая капсула — не просто смена декораций, это погружение в медитативный ритм природы, где каждая нить звучит как нота. ➡️Глава Песня тайги — про глубину. Она про умение читать знаки вокруг: в оттенках заката, в мягкости мха, в упругости ветра Мы перевели язык природы на язык фактур: сочная хвоя встреча…
❤🔥9🔥7🤩1
Девочки , ловите порцию стильного вдохновения! 😍 Я тут наткнулась на новую подборку от Mono-stil.ru — и сразу поняла: надо делиться! В этой коллекции столько характера, что хочется собрать сразу несколько образов И да, я уже мысленно примерила половину вещей… НО СНАЧАЛА ПОДЕЛЮСЬ ЧТО ПРИМЕРИЛА УЖЕ ФИЗИЧЕСКИ 🤭 https://t.me/+xDDj6H6UMyxmYWQ6 телеграмм канал бренда Брюки-баллоны из шёлка в горох (арт. 101952) — э…
🔥25❤🔥17
Девочки, как вам такой эксперимент? Трендовый принт или стереотип👇🏻
А наша то сегодня лекцию в МГУ ведет 🌸
🔥43❤🔥11
Video message, posted without a caption
👍19🔥8❤🔥7
Разница очевидна ❤ Девочки, как вам результат? Пишите в комментариях⤵️
🔥25
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 154 posts we hold for @monostil_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какую еще обувь вы хотели бы видеть у нас в первую очередь?
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой размер обуви вы берете чаще всего?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что для вас самое главное при выборе обуви на широкую ногу?
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Где вы чаще всего чувствуете боль или дискомфорт при носке обуви?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 154 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@monostil_ru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MONO-STIL” (@monostil_ru), 30,416 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monostil_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.