Channel
@monsterFoxes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
163subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001996684938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @monsterFoxes |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/monsterFoxes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 163 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 164 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 161 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 161 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 43.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 28.4% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сейчас лето, отдых, но не для нас! Во-первых, после всех фестивалей, мы живы. Это уже победа, для всех нас. Этот год решил нас окончательно добить интересными новостями, но мы стараемся держаться. Никто не умер и на том спасибо. По мимо всего, наш косбенд продолжает работать над своими коспланами, проектами. Работы много, времени мало, но мы стараемся все успеть до следующего фестиваля, а конкретно "ГикКон".
💘7❤4
○ ᖴOᒪᒪO TᑌᑎITO ○ ▱▱▱▰▰▰▱▱▱▰▰▰▱▱ "Each of us is important, even if his role is not so noticeable at first glance." ▱▱▱▰▰▰▱▱▱▰▰▰▱▱ #Drel
❤6🔥4💘3❤🔥2💯1
Всем пере. Меня зовут Настя или же Дрель. В косбенде занимаюсь оформлением постов, так сказать смм😋 На данный момент, я стараюсь развивать свои навыки в макияже и планирую учиться укладывать парики самостоятельно. Чем я интересуюсь? Да на самом деле много чего... Мои любимые фд: формула 1 (Red Bull в моем сердце), гачиакута, клуб романтики. Так же очень люблю слушать музыку, мне тяжело жить без наушников. Мои любим…
❤6❤🔥4
✰ ℙ𝕖𝕣𝕠×𝕄𝕒𝕝𝕧𝕚𝕟𝕒 ✰ ✮ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡°✩ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡°✮ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡° Не нужна мне малина, Не страшна мне ангина, Не боюсь я вообще ничего! Лишь бы только Мальвина, Обожала меня одного... ✮ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡°✩ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡°✮ ⋆ ˚｡𖦹 ⋆｡° #Avaria #Adele
❤14❤🔥3😇3
Ну и конечно видео выступления #Avaria и #Adele и наше вручение 🦊
❤🔥12❤2🔥2💯1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @monsterFoxes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🦊House of Foxes🥍” (@monsterFoxes), 163 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/monsterFoxes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.