Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for мунли, но не мунлИ

Channel

мунли, но не мунлИ

@moonlyloox

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

513subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001637990028
TypeChannel
Username@moonlyloox
Created20 June 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/moonlyloox

Growth

5125185157 August 2026 — 518 subscribers7 August 2026 — 518 subscribers21 August 2026 — 515 subscribers28 August 2026 — 512 subscribers4 September 2026 — 513 subscribers5137 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 511–519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 18:20513+1
28 Aug 2026, 01:54512-3
21 Aug 2026, 03:22515-3
7 Aug 2026, 17:21518no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:18518first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓4724.5%
💘4121.4%
3317.2%
🙏178.85%
custom 5361569570094081222147.29%
custom 541364680017736279694.69%
❤‍🔥94.69%
🥰84.17%
🔥63.13%
custom 540470859957220973052.60%
👍31.56%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC52 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ему ничего не поможет уже

💘7custom 53615695700940812222custom 54047085995722097302🍓1🙏1

Signed Анонем

4 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC78 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

помогите бро

💘6🍓3🙏2

Signed Анонем

4 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC80 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓7👍3💘1🙏1

Signed Анонем

4 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC195 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌❌❌🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 📜❤️❤️❤️❌📜❤️📜❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❌❌❌❌#loveanddeepspace ❌❌❌🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 𝖸𝗈𝗎'𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗂𝗇 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗌𝗅𝖾𝖾𝗉, 𝖨'𝗆 𝗐𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀, 𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗒𝖺𝗐𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖶𝖾'𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖲𝗎𝗋𝖾, 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝖨 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝖿 𝖨 𝗐𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗅𝖿-𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗍𝗈 𝖯𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗁 𝗈𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 ❌❌❌❌❌#cosplay ❌❌❌❌❌фотограф

custom 5361569570094081222119🔥6🍓5💘2custom 54136468001773627962🙏1

Signed Анонем

4 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💘2🍓1🙏1

Signed Анонем

3 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC80 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thesonntagfilesPhoto

❌❌❌🎀🎀🎀🎀 🤍 + 🌟 вполне себе видимая рука рынка! ❌❌ а ручка-то вот она. 😄🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🎀 ❌ photo • retouch • assistance ❌ ❌ ❌🖤🖤🖤🖤 ❌ ❌❌ #косплейное #фотос

💘3🍓2custom 54136468001773627962🙏1custom 53615695700940812221custom 54047085995722097301

Signed Анонем

31 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC97 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @thesonntagfilesPhoto

🖤🖤🖤🖤 #фотос ❌❌ деловая колбаса? ❌❌ деловое карпаччо ⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐#косплейное⭐❌ 🤍🤍🤍 ⭐❌❌❌❌❌ ❌ 🤍🤍🤍 ❌❌❌❌❌❌ ❌🤍🤍🤍 🌟 photo • retouch 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤

4🍓4💘3custom 54136468001773627963🙏1

Signed Анонем

30 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

напоминаю о поиске! очень нужны все😭🤌

💘3🍓1🙏1

Signed Анонем

28 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @moonly_pngPhoto

Мэджик Фест. просьба указывать меня, если выкладываете фотографии. дополнительно редактировать их нельзя. исходники не отдаю. альбом — https://vk.ru/album-222656714_309964445 фото без сжатия (до 28 августа будут на диске) — https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4J5n/TcYfgpNBh пост в ВК — https://vk.ru/wall-219403220_74

🍓2💘21🙏1custom 54047085995722097301

Signed Анонем

27 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC464 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Москва #МО всем приветик, ищем участников для фотоса по Love And Deepspace (LADS) по первым мифам парней, с их МСшками. только начинаем всех собирать, поэтому будем рады видеть каждого! примерный дедлайн: зима 2026-2027 примерный бюджет: 4900 рублей фотограф, студия и точная дата будет выбираться позже, как только соберём людей. условия: • 18+ (для общего комфорта большей части участников) • платежеспособность •

💘86🍓4🙏1

Signed Анонем

27 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC149 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

как же хочется собрать фотос по ладс, по первым мифам.... очень хочется

6🍓6💘2🙏2

Signed Анонем

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @moonlyloox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мунли, но не мунлИ” (@moonlyloox), 513 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonlyloox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.