Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OFA ๐™Ž๐™๐™Š๐™๐™€

Channel

OFA ๐™Ž๐™๐™Š๐™๐™€

@mora_3_3

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

263subscribers

+28 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003898449898
TypeChannel
Username@mora_3_3
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mora_3_3

Growth

23528325924 August 2026 โ€” 235 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 235 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 251 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 283 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 263 subscribers26324 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 228โ€“290 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:40263-20
1 Sept 2026, 04:04283+32
25 Aug 2026, 08:11251+16
24 Aug 2026, 18:45235no change
24 Aug 2026, 18:31235first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
49.2%
avg views รท 263 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 August 2026 โ€“ 24 August 2026)
Views total2,588
Reactions total314
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

314 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค23073.2%
๐Ÿ”ฅ288.92%
๐ŸŽ‰165.10%
๐Ÿคฏ144.46%
๐Ÿฅฐ113.50%
๐Ÿ‘92.87%
๐Ÿ‘30.955%
๐Ÿ˜ก20.637%
๐Ÿฆ„10.318%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 314 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC9 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ูุงุถู„ 1 ุจุณ ูŠุฎูˆุงุชูŠ

โค3

24 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

๐ŸŽฐ ู„ุนุจุฉ ุงู„ุฑูˆู„ูŠุช โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ“Œ ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ุงู„ุบุฑูุฉ ๐ŸŽฒ ุณุญุจ ุนู„ูŠ ูƒุงุด โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ“œ ุงู„ู‚ูˆุงุนุฏ ุตู„ูŠ ุนู„ู‰ ุงู„ู†ุจูŠ ูˆุงู†ุถู… โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โœ… ุดุฑูˆุท ุงู„ู…ุดุงุฑูƒุฉ โ€ข @ms_ch_1

โค1

24 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC48 views8 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ุดุฏูˆุง ุชูุงุนู„ ู…ุฎุชู„ู ูˆุงู†ุฒู„ ุญุงู„ุง โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ

โค5๐ŸŽ‰2๐Ÿคฏ1

24 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ุทุจ ุชุณุช ุฑูŠุชุด ุนู„ู‰ ูƒุงุด โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ ุงุดูˆู ุงู‚ูˆู‰ ู…ุฎุชู„ู ูˆุงู†ุฒู„ ุญุงู„ุง โญโญ

โค5๐Ÿคฏ2

23 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC132 views5 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ุงู„ู ู…ุจุฑูˆูƒ ู…ุนุงูƒ 2ู‚ ุชุณุชู„ู… โค๏ธ @HOSSAMC7

โค5

23 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC126 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026

ูŠู„ุง ุจุตูˆ ููˆู‚ ุดูˆููˆ ู…ูŠู† ูƒุณุจ ๐Ÿ”ฅ

โค5๐Ÿ”ฅ4

23 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC141 views15 reactionsread 24 August 2026

๐ŸŽฐ ู†ุชูŠุฌุฉ ุงู„ุณุญุจ ๐ŸŽฐ ๐ŸŽฒ ุงู„ุบุฑูุฉ: ุณุญุจ ุนู„ูŠ ูƒุงุด ๐ŸŽŠ ุงู„ูุงุฆุฒ ู‡ูˆ: ๐Ÿ† FELO โœจ ู…ุจุฑูˆูƒ ุงู„ููˆุฒ! โœจ

โค12๐Ÿ˜ก2๐ŸŽ‰1

23 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC148 views20 reactionsread 24 August 2026

1๏ธโƒฃ

โค18๐Ÿคฏ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mora_3_3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œOFA ๐™Ž๐™๐™Š๐™๐™€โ€ (@mora_3_3), 263 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mora_3_3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.