Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 德傳媒官方新聞頻道

Channel

德傳媒官方新聞頻道

@moralmedia

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,471subscribers

-306 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446387003
TypeChannel
Username@moralmedia
Description德傳媒致力於恢復傳統道德價值觀。 歡迎加入 #德傳媒交流群組 第一時間交流時事資訊 https://t.me/+f7XStomgTNJmMmVl 為了大家能有一個乾淨、暢所欲言的交流環境,敬請朋友們遵守規則🙏🙏🙏 🈲暴力、色情內容 🈲重複洗版內容 🈲謾罵、侮辱性內容 🈲廣告、鏈接 本頻道群組不能發鏈接,是出於安全和時間考慮。有群組因受到機器人的「灌水」攻擊,多年的心血一夜之間化為烏有。我們的管理員都是義務服務的,沒有時間24小時看著群組不受攻擊,所以採用了機器人管理。對於給大家帶來的不便敬請原諒🙏🙏
Created31 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/moralmedia

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,4717,7787,624.56 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,778 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,769 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,748 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,738 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,723 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,714 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,707 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,696 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,683 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,659 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,647 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,638 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,597 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,554 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,545 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,531 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,513 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,504 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,496 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,489 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,483 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,477 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,471 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -306. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,425–7,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:597,471-6
2 Nov 2026, 18:177,477-6
30 Oct 2026, 11:567,483-6
27 Oct 2026, 14:057,489-7
24 Oct 2026, 11:557,496-8
21 Oct 2026, 03:007,504-9
17 Oct 2026, 14:407,513-18
14 Oct 2026, 05:287,531-14
10 Oct 2026, 15:357,545-9
4 Oct 2026, 22:167,554-43
25 Sept 2026, 09:427,597-41
17 Sept 2026, 07:027,638-9
13 Sept 2026, 09:387,647-12
9 Sept 2026, 08:177,659-24
3 Sept 2026, 23:397,683-13
31 Aug 2026, 14:477,696-11
28 Aug 2026, 22:167,707-7
25 Aug 2026, 20:487,714-9
22 Aug 2026, 20:587,723-15
19 Aug 2026, 13:257,738first reading

Engagement

88 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.17%
avg views ÷ 7,471 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 88 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held88 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total5,992
Reactions total177
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,540
Videos
≈4,780
Links
≈3,870

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 45m
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,203 reactions across 88 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20817.3%
🤬14311.9%
🔥13611.3%
👍13211.0%
💯1129.31%
🙏1088.98%
😡524.32%
🙈463.82%
⚡433.57%
🏆403.33%
😈312.58%
🫡201.66%
👏191.58%
😱171.41%
🙉161.33%
🕊141.16%
🤯120.998%
😢100.831%
🤣90.748%
💔80.665%
9 further kinds272.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 22:21 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibraryPhoto

(下)💥 「川普捕鼠器—— 45天倒數|風暴前的寧靜:安靜的川普才最可怕|大棋局的關鍵:2028乾淨的選舉 接(上) ⬇️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary/22423 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 在2020年之前,川普一再發出警告「民主黨會竊取選舉」。當他們真的這樣做時,他「從未閉嘴」。對「俄羅斯騙局」也如是。彈劾案、拜登邊境、法律戰,每一次都「大聲疾呼」無一例外。 然而,今次中期選舉過後,共和黨失去了眾議院、參議院,連德州、俄亥俄等紅州席位也大幅翻轉。這是一場「史詩級的痛擊」。任何有基本數學常識的人,都能看出深紅州的票數不對勁。 🔔可川普做了什麼? 他竟然在黃金時段的節目上恭喜他們,而且「整天」完全沒有一絲作弊的抱怨,甚至連「暗示作弊」都沒有。你不覺得奇怪嗎? 這十年來,你能否數得出,他如此安靜的次數?而且每一次他如此安靜之後,他的敵人最後都「沒有好下場」。 🔔「頂級獵食…

❤3🏆1👍1💯1

5 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC158 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibraryPhoto

(上)💥「川普捕鼠器」—— 「民主黨的最後狂歡」與60天窗口期 不必驚惶失措,一切才剛剛開始。這是一場「必須發生的驚嚇事件」。 就在境內外的敵人—— 民主黨、名義上的共和黨人(RINO)以及媒體—— 正在歡呼雀躍、狂歡慶祝、以為自己已全面掌控參眾兩院、多數州,甚至鎖定2028總統大位之際,「真正的棋局」才剛落子。 🔔這不是終局,而是為2028預備一個真正乾淨、誠信選舉的「誘捕過程」。 🔔民主黨的最後瘋狂,正是在世人眼前走進那早已安裝的「捕鼠器」的一刻。全球大規模覺醒,往往從這樣的「必要驚嚇」開始。 🔔馬斯克(ElonMusk)發文:「看來我這次用來干擾選舉的太空雷射沒起作用了。」這當然是調侃,卻點出更深層的點子:2024年他在公佈選舉結果前數小時就掌握數據的流向。 🔔這次中期選舉的結果「出乎許多人的意料」:藍色浪潮「比民主黨自己的預期更猛烈」,甚至翻轉德州、堪薩斯、俄亥俄等傳統共和黨優勢州。 但真正要問的是:這些結…

❤6👍4⚡1🏆1💯1🙏1

4 Nov 2026, 17:06 UTC807 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

不僅奧馬爾高票當選 還有她的索馬里部落…. 這次中期選舉,騙取移民資格、欺詐、盜竊聯邦資金等多項罪名,正接受聯邦調查的奧馬爾(Ilhan Omar)仍以76.5%高票連任…. 除奧馬爾再次當選國會議員外,還有多名索馬里同鄉,也當選明尼蘇達州、俄亥俄州、及奧勒岡州的州參議院及州眾議院議員。 我們真的活在荒誕劇裡 實在無言! ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

🔥5🤬3🙈2🙉2🌚1😈1😡1

4 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC300 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibraryPhoto

💥馬斯克一語成讖:Game Over for America—— 眼目的盡頭:信心的開始!|川普懸紅100萬美元💰給提供舞弊證據的人—— 這會否成為局面的新錨點? 💥中期選舉落幕,民主黨大勝,同時奪取眾議院與參議院控制權。 🔔整個世界彷彿瞬間靜止。 股市應聲反應、剛發芽成長的經濟、許多剛展開步伐的偉大計劃,全數蒙上陰影。這不是一場簡單的選舉失敗,而是「最後一道防線」的崩潰。 🔔選舉前,馬斯克已公開警告:若民主黨「橫掃」眾議院、參議院,再拿下2028年總統大位,美國就「Game Over」。他列出三項具體行動: 1)把華盛頓特區與波多黎各升格為州,以鎖死參議院多數 2)開放邊界並將非法居留者全面合法化,以「永久鞏固選民基礎」 3)擴大最高法院席位,立即取得多數。 🔔結果將使美國成為「永久性一黨專政國家」:民主在任何實質意義上的終結。他強調,只要保住51席共和黨參議員,就能擋住這一切。 🔹川普在《紐約郵報》專訪中,幾乎完全…

🙏9❤3👍2💯2⚡1🙈1

3 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC891 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

耐人尋味的數字: 這世界有很多莫名奇妙的事情…. 🔹「5億」歐洲人,指望「3億」美國人保護他們,去抵禦「1.4億」俄羅斯人—— 而這些俄羅斯人連「4000萬」烏克蘭人都打不過。 🔹同時,這「5億」歐洲人,甚至沒意識到,自己正被「20億」穆斯林「征服」。 🔹而這些穆斯林卻聲稱,他們正受到「900萬」以色列人的迫害。 這世界真奇怪…. 🧐 ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

👍8💯5❤2🤣2🏆1👏1🔥1😁1

3 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC324 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibraryPhoto

🚨馬斯克警告:美國的終局…. 這是Elon近年來最直接、最硬核的政治表態之一。他明確表達這次「中期選舉」的參議院席次,定位為阻止美國走向「永久一黨專政」的關鍵防火牆‼️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 民主黨若2028橫掃三權,美國將會淪為「永久一黨專政」…. 馬斯克: 我最大的擔憂是:如果民主黨在2028年橫掃眾議院、參議院、及總統職位,他們將會—— 1)他們會把華盛頓特區與波多黎各「升格為州」,藉此在參議院取得壓倒性多數。 2)全面開放邊境,並把所有非法居留美國者一概合法化,以鎖定「永久大多數」。 3)擴充最高法院席次,立刻取得多數控制。這將使美國變成「永久的一黨專政國家」,民主在任何實質意義上都將終結‼️ 🔔要阻止這一切的發生,只需在2029年確保參議院有51席共和黨議員。 🔔這就是為什麼這次選舉,你必須投票給共和黨參議員。其他理由相比之下,已經不再重要。 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🔔馬斯克於中期選舉前發佈此文。隨後他更補充一…

🙏4❤2💯2⚡1🏆1👍1

3 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC733 views16 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

幾乎沒皮膚的身軀 一顆永不放棄的心 11歲的伊拉克男童艾薩,外表脆弱得令人心疼。他全身極度消瘦,四肢細弱,只能活在輪椅上。 🔹他的皮膚雖然存在,但非常薄、緊繃,且幾乎缺乏正常的皮下脂肪,因此骨頭、血管與關節特別明顯。 🔹四肢肌肉量嚴重不足,整體呈現嚴重營養不良、及脂肪代謝異常的狀態。這些特徵與早衰症(Progeria)類疾病,或其他嚴重的遺傳性代謝/結締組織疾病相似,常見表現包括皮下脂肪幾乎消失、肌肉萎縮、皮膚變薄老化、頭髮稀疏等。這是一種極為罕見的遺傳性疾病。 🔹艾薩每天靠靜脈營養(TPN)維生,無法正常進食,身體極度消瘦。據社群媒體的訊息,家人正計劃帶他前往印度進行DNA檢測,希望透過基因分析,找出艾薩的確切病因,為未來的精準治療或照護打開一扇窗。 印度在這類遺傳性疾病的基因診斷與研究上已有一定經驗,相關中心可協助全外顯子或目標基因定序。 🔔即使帶著殘破的身軀,艾薩的眼神與緊握的雙拳仍透著不屈的堅韌。他不是受害者…

❤7💔3🙏2👍1🕊1🤯1😢1

3 Nov 2026, 00:42 UTC780 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

我不會與人爭論它是「飛機」還是「導彈」 就像25年前,當時人們的認知,根本無法理解飛機怎麼會在戶外被投影出來。這一次,海湖莊園附近的「所謂飛機事故」,情況類似。 但至少,我們可以從他們的「作品」中,找到留下的簽名: ~發生在11月9條人命(9/11) ~還有一年一度的《經濟學人》預言封面 對未知的事,保持謙卑與好奇。 不要低估他們的邪惡。 ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

💯4🙏3❤2⚡1🏆1👍1🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 19:37 UTC300 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibraryPhoto

🚨「推翻美國政府」的圖謀曝光:錄音流出—— 前USAID官員與退役將領密謀「中期選舉後」宣佈聯邦政府「不合法」把權力交給民主黨州長‼️ 🔔一段2026年8月13日的錄音通話流出,揭露一群前聯邦官員、退役軍人、大使、與非政府組織成員正在私下規劃「那一天」—— 他們自行決定宣佈美國聯邦政府「不合法」時,早已寫好備忘錄,指示民主黨州長如何接管國家的領導權。 🔹這段錄音由研究員「#DataRepublican (真實姓名 #JennicaPounds)」公開。據她揭露:通話參與者約200–300名前美國國際開發署(#USAID)民主與治理部門官員組成的網絡有關。 🔔這些人在過去數十年以「民主援助」標籤,將美國納稅人的錢輸送到海外的「顏色革命」與反對派支援的計劃中。華盛頓承包商、顧問、及非營利組織從中發大財,資金再流回國內同一批人的口袋。 🔔直到川普政府與 #DOGE 徹底砍掉USAID預算、合約、及肥缺後,他們失去了源源不絕的資…

😡8🔥2❤1👍1🤯1

2 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC690 views14 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

🚨🛩️海湖莊園安危只差5-8英里:飛機便直插屋頂💥 就是這些尖端科技佈置,造出那5-8英里的距離,讓海湖莊園(MaraLago)避過了飛機墜在屋頂嗎? 發生在中期選舉一天前。 沒有意外、沒有偶然。 ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

🙏9⚡1🏆1💯1🔥1🕊1

2 Nov 2026, 15:37 UTC154 views11 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

(下)🚨🛩️ 高速墜地完全解體|距離棕櫚灘「海湖莊園」僅5-8英里處墜毀,現場只見大火與「彈坑」幾乎不見飛機殘骸‼️ 接(上) ⬇️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary/22370 〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🔔遺下最後的無線電通訊—— 聲音極為驚悚的女飛行員與邁阿密中心通訊: 🔹先報告結冰與湍流,並要求爬升到 FL370。 🔹隨後緊急:「We’re descending 8,000… Mayday, Mayday! We’re descending 10,000 feet per minute.」 🔹再報:「Declaring an emergency… We are in an overspeed condition, descending 20,000 feet per minute.」 🔹「We’re gonna crash into the ground.」我們要撞地…

⚡4🙏3❤1👍1🔥1🙊1

2 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC570 views13 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

🇫🇷巴黎人旅遊華沙🇵🇱 對眼前景象感電擊般震撼⚡️ 一名巴黎人,在旅遊🇵🇱波蘭華沙時,幾乎不敢相信眼前的景象,感到「電擊般的震撼」: 「造訪華沙,對我這個巴黎人來說,是一種像電擊般的震撼:對於一個居住在滿目瘡痍土地上的人來說,這是一座『健康狀況極佳』的城市,交通運作順暢,『一切都井然有序』,商店遍佈各處,甚至連最不起眼的樓梯底都有小商店。 無論你走到哪裡,居民們總是面帶笑容、毫無憂慮,即使是凌晨三點,他們都能隨心所欲外出散步,不用擔心個人安全,甚至是中央車站都安全無虞! 這裡一切都便宜到不得了,實在難以置信!這完全是歐盟所宣揚的「共存」理念的絕對反例。」 這就是馮德萊恩「視波蘭如眼中釘」的原因,她絕不能容忍有加盟國不聽指揮: 「獨自運作」過著幸福的生活! 她會不擇手段,脅迫波蘭乖乖的回歸她設定的軌道上—— 混亂、困頓、貧窮的社會。 ➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰ 以馬

👍6⚡2💯2❤1🏆1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @moralmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,166
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“德傳媒官方新聞頻道” (@moralmedia), 7,471 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moralmedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.