Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مجلهٔ مورس

Channel

مجلهٔ مورس

@morse_mag

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

256subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002822857311
TypeChannel
Username@morse_mag
Descriptionدربارهٔ ارتباط‌شناسی و رسانه‌ای شدن ارتباط: @hosnabarati @Hzeinali
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held9
On Telegramt.me/morse_mag

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@morse_mag was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@morse_media
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026

Growth

237256246.56 August 2026 — 237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 237 subscribers12 August 2026 — 241 subscribers18 August 2026 — 244 subscribers26 August 2026 — 242 subscribers2 September 2026 — 243 subscribers11 September 2026 — 242 subscribers2 October 2026 — 248 subscribers4 November 2026 — 256 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
9 measurements spanning 90 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 234–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 01:22256+8
2 Oct 2026, 07:58248+6
11 Sept 2026, 19:42242-1
2 Sept 2026, 19:45243+1
26 Aug 2026, 22:46242-2
18 Aug 2026, 21:56244+3
12 Aug 2026, 03:32241+4
7 Aug 2026, 02:45237no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:23237first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.0%
avg views ÷ 256 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held35 (1 January 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total1,958
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
120
Videos
10
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 08s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9982.5%
👍97.50%
🔥75.83%
👏21.67%
😁10.833%
😐10.833%
🙏10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 09:02 UTC51 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

دکتر محمدمهدی فرقانی از روزنامه‌نگاری و توسعه سخن می‌گوید. t.me/morse_mag

1 Nov 2026, 07:21 UTC60 viewsread 4 November 2026

واژه‌ها فقط ابزار ارتباط نیستند، آن‌ها جهان را برای ما قاب‌بندی می‌کنند در ارتباطات انسانی با برداشت زبانی از واقعیت مواجهیم. زبان فقط وسیله‌ی بیان نیست، بلکه ابزاری است برای ساختن معنا و شکل دادن به درک ما از پدیده‌ها. نظریه‌پرداز بلاغت، کِنِت برک (Kenneth Burke)، این ایده را در قالب مفهومی به نام «Terministic Screens» یا به فارسی، «فیلترهای اصطلاحی» مطرح می‌کند. برک می‌گوید هر دستگاه اصطلاحی، حتی اگر بازتابی از وا…

30 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

ما باید آموزش ببینیم تا بتوانیم با یکدیگر بحث کنیم عصبانی شویم و در عین حال یکدیگر را نکشیم! این خودش دستاورد بزرگی است. t.me/morse_mag

👍3

29 Oct 2026, 16:16 UTC104 viewsread 4 November 2026

#ارتباطات ۶ عنصر اصلی ارتباط صرف نظر از محیط، تقریباً همه نظریه‌ها، ارتباط را به این بلوک‌های سازنده بنیادی تقسیم می‌کنند: • فرستنده (منبع): موجودیتی که پیام را ایجاد و رمزگذاری می‌کند. • پیام: اطلاعات، ایده‌ها یا احساسات واقعی که به اشتراک گذاشته می‌شوند (کلامی یا غیرکلامی). • کانال (رسانه): مسیری که پیام از طریق آن منتقل می‌شود (مثلاً متن، گفتار، ویدئو، امواج رادیویی). • گیرنده: مخاطب هدف که پیام را رمزگشایی کرده و…

28 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTC129 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026

‌#سانسور در قرن بیست‌ویکم، سانسورچی‌ها دیگر از طریق سانسور اطلاعات عمل نمی‌کنند. آنها با تزریق حجم عظیمی از اطلاعات نادرست درمورد اتفاقات پیرامونتان در جامعه، درواقع قدرت تحلیل، تصمیم و تفکر درست را از شما سلب می‌کنند. 📘 ۲۱ درس برای قرن بیست‌ویکم t.me/morse_mag

❤2

27 Oct 2026, 19:27 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026

رسانه‌های اجتماعی به انبوهی از احمق‌ها اجازه داده‌اند تا مانند دانشمندان صحبت کنند. 👤اومبرتو اکو (1932 - 2016) نشانه‌شناس، متخصص قرون وسطی و فیلسوف ایتالیایی t.me/morse_mag

❤5👍1

26 Oct 2026, 18:16 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

دربارهٔ #فرامدرنیته ‌اکنون در قرن بیست‌ویکم، پسامدرنیته جای خود را به عصری می‌دهد که ژیل لیپووتسکی (۲۰۰۵) آن را فرامدرنیته (Hypermodernity) نامید. این جامعه‌ای است در حال شتاب گرفتن و با مصرف بیش از حد، تغییر بیش از حد و فردگرایی بیش از حد مشخص می‌شود. انعطاف‌پذیری و تغییر مداومی که در پسامدرنیته آغاز شد، در حال شتاب گرفتن است. علاوه بر این، گذار از پسامدرنیته به فرامدرنیته به‌صورتی هموار رخ نمی‌دهد؛ بلکه رونده…

❤2😐1

24 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC146 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
File

#کتاب 📘ارتباطات اقناعی 👤اتو لربینگر - ترجمه علی رستمی t.me/morse_mag

❤3

24 Oct 2026, 17:22 UTC156 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

بشر فقط جست‌وجو گر حقیقت نیست بلکه درمورد خود و دیگران فریب را نیز جست‌وجو می‌کند. 📘 ارتباطات اقناعی 👤اتو لربینگر t.me/morse_mag

❤3

23 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC145 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

فهمیدن فعالیتی پایان‌ناپذیر است که طی آن، در عین تنوع و تغییر مدام، با واقعیت کنار می‌آییم و آشتی می‌کنیم و به عبارت دیگر، در جهان احساس آشنایی و آسودگی می‌کنیم. فهمیدن و سیاست #هانا_آرنت t.me/morse_mag

❤5

23 Oct 2026, 14:56 UTC155 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

دربارهٔ مقاله روابط عمومی و فرهنگ پسامدرن روابط عمومی پسامدرن پتانسیل ایجاد سیستمی را دارد که می‌تواند درک سرکوبگرانه از روابط عمومی مدرن را بشکند. بیشتر پژوهش‌هایی که مفهوم "پسامدرن" را با روابط عمومی مرتبط می‌کنند، آن را به عنوان یک جایگزین برای روابط عمومی مدرن می‌دانند. استدلال می‌شود سازمان‌ها می‌توانند از طریق روابط عمومی موضعی فعال اتخاذ کنند و از طریق سیاست‌های فعال و رادیکال به دموکراسی کمک کنند. روابط عموم…

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @morse_mag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مجلهٔ مورس” (@morse_mag), 256 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/morse_mag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.