Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
52 measurements spanning 82 days, net -2,270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,533–48,484 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 15:36
45,873
-32
27 Oct 2026, 12:54
45,905
-23
26 Oct 2026, 10:16
45,928
-22
25 Oct 2026, 11:46
45,950
-34
24 Oct 2026, 13:15
45,984
-12
23 Oct 2026, 16:37
45,996
-11
22 Oct 2026, 19:00
46,007
-39
21 Oct 2026, 15:29
46,046
-25
20 Oct 2026, 11:18
46,071
-8
19 Oct 2026, 13:06
46,079
-34
18 Oct 2026, 09:39
46,113
-15
17 Oct 2026, 11:56
46,128
-14
16 Oct 2026, 09:20
46,142
-40
15 Oct 2026, 06:59
46,182
-26
14 Oct 2026, 03:19
46,208
-37
11 Oct 2026, 16:17
46,245
-83
7 Oct 2026, 04:56
46,328
-135
2 Oct 2026, 07:59
46,463
-378
18 Sept 2026, 12:36
46,841
-80
16 Sept 2026, 03:16
46,921
first reading
Engagement
1,420 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.13%
avg views ÷ 45,873 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
449 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
449
of 1,420 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 434 of 449 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held
1,420 (7 August 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total
1,056,790
Reactions total
10,801
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Oct 2026, 13:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 22m
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 415 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23,185 reactions across 938 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
3,414
14.7%
😱
3,272
14.1%
🤣
3,168
13.7%
❤
2,395
10.3%
🤡
2,103
9.07%
👍
1,729
7.46%
😁
1,474
6.36%
🤯
917
3.96%
😢
916
3.95%
🔥
750
3.23%
👎
546
2.35%
👌
453
1.95%
🤮
338
1.46%
🙏
243
1.05%
🤔
169
0.729%
💩
142
0.612%
🙈
142
0.612%
👏
118
0.509%
🥴
98
0.423%
❤🔥
75
0.323%
45 further kinds
723
3.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 947 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mos24_online. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.7%
7 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,370
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,200
over 993 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqumeBBs
1
2 October 2026
2 October 2026
2W5zFGm6MFX
1
11 September 2026
11 September 2026
2W5zFHJFmMB
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
2W5zFHxGaeu
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
2W5zFJ4WLED
1
14 October 2026
14 October 2026
2W5zFJjGSNd
1
14 October 2026
14 October 2026
2W5zFK2in5F
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 30 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
⚡️ В московском метро задержали 36-летнего мужчину, который прикоснулся до одежды в районе половых органов несовершеннолетней девочки
Инцидент произошел на станции «Алма-Атинская». Задержанный прикоснулся к половым органам ребенка, когда та выходила из поезда.
Спустя две недели полиция нашла подозреваемого по записям с камер. На допросе он уверял, что все произошло случайно. Суд признал мужчину виновным в мелком ху…
👀 Осколок металла едва не лишил зрения жителя Подмосковья
Во время работы с металлом ему в глаз попал двухмиллиметровый осколок, который застрял прямо в радужке.
Врачи провели сложную операцию без лишних разрезов и швов, чтобы зрение не ухудшилось из-за астигматизма. Осколок аккуратно извлекли, а вместо наложения швов использовали специальную лечебную линзу.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@m…
⚡️ В пределах ТТК второй день подряд ввели ограничения мобильного интернета из-за саммита «Россия — Африка»
Сайты из «белых списков» работают.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
🐗 В ноябре и декабре кабаны все чаще выходят к дачным поселкам и выбегают на дороги Москвы и Подмосковья
Сейчас у животных пик брачного сезона, поэтому они становятся активнее, агрессивнее и чаще ищут еду вблизи человеческого жилья.
Встреча с таким гостем может закончиться плачевно: кабан разгоняется до 40 км/ч и опасен своими клыками. Специалисты предупреждают, что приближаться к зверям категорически нельзя, особе…
🔴 Пробки до 9 баллов ожидаются сегодня вечером в Москве из-за саммита «Россия — Африка», об этом предупредили в Дептрансе
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
😁 В ЖК «Савеловский Сити» у этого жителя с унитаза открывается отличный вид
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
❗️Фейковые HR начали красть данные через ссылки на собеседование в Zoom
Поддельные сайты мошенников почти не отличаются от настоящих.
Распространите.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
🪆Крокодилов в бюстгальтерах, бегемотов в юбках и непонятную кракозябру с косоглазием завезли в Metro
Какой год, такие и новогодние игрушки.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
❗️В Москве сисадмин постоянно воровал на работе: он унес 5 ноутбуков и 51 док-станцию к компьютерам
Вороватый скуф заходил в комнату на протяжении двух месяцев — каждый раз он забирал с собой ноутбук или док-станцию.
Он успел продать техники на 2+ млн рублей, но был задержан товарищем майором.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
😳 Квартиру с золотым унитазом за 75 миллионов рублей продают в Свиблово
Собственник инкрустировал золотом плитку в санузле, а также сделал позолоченный пол.
Цыганский декор никогда не выйдет из моды.
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
⚡️ 150 рейсов задержали и отменили в Москве на фоне атаки БПЛА и угрозы ракетной атаки
Если у вас не грузятся фото/видео, смотрите их в MAX
@mos24_online | Написать нам
😱9❤4😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,420 posts we hold for @mos24_online. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mos24_online edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Москва 24/7” (@mos24_online), 45,873 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mos24_online.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.