Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اشتاگلي ...

Channel

اشتاگلي ...

@mosa_Hakam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,382subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001313303153
TypeChannel
Username@mosa_Hakam
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mosa_Hakam

Growth

1,3791,3821,380.58 September 2026 — 1,382 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,381 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,379 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,382 subscribers8 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,379–1,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:011,382+3
14 Sept 2026, 06:561,379-2
10 Sept 2026, 09:381,381-1
8 Sept 2026, 01:221,382first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 1,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
220
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held19 (22 August 20265 September 2026)
Views total2,866
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 00:33 UTC106 viewsread 8 September 2026

‏بعرف أكون ‏أي شئ تحتاجوه ‏حضن ‏ودن ‏صاحب، بيغلط ‏بس مش بيخون ‏-الراوي

3 Sept 2026, 23:01 UTC136 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

مُذكرات أب كتب في صفحتها الأخيرة " ابني هوه ابني حتّى يتزوج ،، وابنتي هِي ابنتي مدى الحياة "

31 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC211 viewsread 8 September 2026

‏وحيدٌ مثل قشة ، ولا يكفيني أن اضع رأسي على كتفك أريد أن أصبح كتفك . ‏ ‏زياد خداش

29 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC256 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

" ايها الموت ياخبز الجميع " اوكتافيو باث

29 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC218 viewsread 8 September 2026

" القلب المكسور يجرح " بثينة العيسى

29 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC200 viewsread 8 September 2026

لسا أكوابا كي يفيض منا الكلام إذا امتلأنا

28 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC239 viewsread 8 September 2026

عينك الأمنيات الطيبة التي نتمنى عينك " من العايدين " عينك " زوار " الجدات الثمين عينك صيفُ القرية و موسم المطر عينك قبلة أمٍ لصغيرها قبل المنام عينك " غُربة " شجيّة من حُنجرة فنان العرب والعجم عينك خُبز الأم في صباحات الشتاء عيناكِ محصول بُن حَمصتهُ الملائكة عينك السلِم بعد عقود النزاع والحرب عينك أنا و أنا أصفّ عينك عينك ضبابُ القرية على بُستانِ تُفاح عينك نشيد أطفال الجنة عينك مهر السماء للأرض عينك " الَعصاري " الس

28 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC216 viewsread 8 September 2026

اسمي حين تنطقيه يبدو لذيذًا جدّا كيف تطبخين كلّ ذلك الحنظل بمجرّد يا : فلان لطفي تياهي

28 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC234 viewsread 8 September 2026

كيف لهاتفٍ بحجمٍ الكفّ أن يحتمِل مُرور صوتكِ فيه دون أن يذوب حبيب أبو رقية

28 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC234 viewsread 8 September 2026

لم تكنْ تَكتَحِل كانتْ تُسيِّجُ البحر محمد جيد

27 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC253 viewsread 8 September 2026

- تتذكر أيامنا ؟ - أي - الله لا يعيدا.!

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mosa_Hakam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

- مقهى الشعراء ☕️
@MNAWAB99 · 29,791
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
تعَلّمْ معنا
@hamo2017 · 29,192
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اشتاگلي ...” (@mosa_Hakam), 1,382 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mosa_Hakam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.