Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пульс Москвы

Channel

Пульс Москвы

@mospulse

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

152,269subscribers

-2,856 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728202783
TypeChannel
Username@mospulse
DescriptionО Москве и самом важном. Опросы, репортажи, бизнес, новости и обзоры — всё, что делает регион уникальным. Сотрудничество: @nasmoscow Канал работает эксклюзивно с сервисом: @swaymedia Менеджер: @maxim_rocketseed РКН: clck.ru/3GbcFk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mospulse

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

152,269155,125153,6977 August 2026 — 155,125 subscribers7 August 2026 — 155,125 subscribers7 August 2026 — 155,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 155,047 subscribers9 August 2026 — 155,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 154,969 subscribers11 August 2026 — 154,918 subscribers12 August 2026 — 154,854 subscribers14 August 2026 — 154,809 subscribers15 August 2026 — 154,744 subscribers17 August 2026 — 154,691 subscribers18 August 2026 — 154,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 154,612 subscribers20 August 2026 — 154,542 subscribers21 August 2026 — 154,507 subscribers22 August 2026 — 154,442 subscribers24 August 2026 — 154,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 154,311 subscribers26 August 2026 — 154,236 subscribers27 August 2026 — 154,203 subscribers28 August 2026 — 154,174 subscribers29 August 2026 — 154,117 subscribers30 August 2026 — 154,059 subscribers31 August 2026 — 154,014 subscribers1 September 2026 — 153,968 subscribers2 September 2026 — 153,921 subscribers3 September 2026 — 153,817 subscribers5 September 2026 — 153,725 subscribers8 September 2026 — 153,548 subscribers11 September 2026 — 153,416 subscribers13 September 2026 — 153,338 subscribers15 September 2026 — 153,259 subscribers16 September 2026 — 152,360 subscribers19 September 2026 — 152,269 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2,856. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151,841–155,553 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:20152,269-91
16 Sept 2026, 21:39152,360-899
15 Sept 2026, 00:36153,259-79
13 Sept 2026, 07:58153,338-78
11 Sept 2026, 13:59153,416-132
8 Sept 2026, 20:19153,548-177
5 Sept 2026, 11:38153,725-92
3 Sept 2026, 15:17153,817-104
2 Sept 2026, 05:22153,921-47
1 Sept 2026, 04:15153,968-46
31 Aug 2026, 01:38154,014-45
30 Aug 2026, 00:09154,059-58
29 Aug 2026, 01:45154,117-57
28 Aug 2026, 03:13154,174-29
27 Aug 2026, 05:27154,203-33
26 Aug 2026, 07:34154,236-75
25 Aug 2026, 05:26154,311-52
24 Aug 2026, 07:38154,363-79
22 Aug 2026, 18:38154,442-65
21 Aug 2026, 07:16154,507first reading

Engagement

581 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.39%
avg views ÷ 152,269 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,200
355 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
355
of 581 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held581 (6 August 202624 September 2026)
Views total2,911,582
Reactions total37,414
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,670
Videos
7,340
Links
15,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 15m
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 270 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

61,707 reactions across 581 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣22,55236.5%
10,31316.7%
😱7,84812.7%
🤯6,42310.4%
👍4,9888.08%
🔥3,3715.46%
🗿2,9194.73%
🥰1,3072.12%
custom 53864560923708294448391.36%
💯6941.12%
👏4530.734%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 581 of the 581 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61,707 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 581 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.344%
2 of 581 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,260
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,440
over 579 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeTVF5D18 September 20268 September 2026
2VtzquYJy9W17 September 20267 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 581 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 08:26 UTC512 views23 reactionsread 24 September 2026

💳 Минфин предложил обложить налогом пассивные доходы россиян. Суть инициативы в том, чтобы включить их в базу НДФЛ и облагать прогрессивным налогом от 13 до 22%, т. е. в первую очередь размер будет зависеть от общей суммы дохода. По оценкам, изменения коснутся около 4 млн россиян. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤯19🗿2😱2

24 Sept 2026, 06:36 UTC≈3,000 views213 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

🐈 В Москве засняли милейшую сцену: полицейский погладил бездомного котика, а тот ответил взаимным теплом. В итоге ребята нашли друг друга, и мужчина забрал котика себе домой. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

152🥰36🔥20👍5

24 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC≈4,110 views115 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Вот как выглядит настоящая месть 🙂‍↕️ Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣85🔥2010

24 Sept 2026, 05:06 UTC≈4,270 views54 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Доброе утро, дорогие читатели💗 Сегодня +18...+21 градусов, переменная облачность, дожди. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

33👍17🥰4

23 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC≈6,880 views222 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

😢 Музыкальный критик и журналист Сергей Соседов умер на 59-м году жизни. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

😱186🤯257🤣3🗿1

23 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈7,290 views87 reactionsread 24 September 2026

🐈 72% москвичек готовы содержать мужчину в трудный период — исследование. Ради этого они готовы отказаться от покупок, отпуска, походов в заведения, а некоторые даже и косметики. 28% считают, что «трудности мужчины — его трудности» и он должен решить их самостоятельно. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🥰33🤣27🤯16😱6🗿41

23 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC≈7,100 views89 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

😱 Музыкальные чарты заполонила «нейропорнуха» — ИИ-песни с обилием мата и «всяких непристойностей». И проблема-то не в самих треках, подобные были и раньше, и даже на Древней Руси матерные частушки пели. Проблема в том, что под нож цензуры попадает буквально культовая музыка (и не только), запикиваются даже совсем безобидные слова, ведь вдруг не так посчитают «контекст», но зато подобный нейрошлак никто не трогает

🤯37🤣30😱87🗿7

23 Sept 2026, 15:21 UTC≈6,770 views104 reactionsread 24 September 2026

😐 Минэкономразвития предлагает расширить список невозвратных товаров на маркетплейсах. Так, будет запрещено возвращать обувь, одежду и любые товары, контактирующие с телом. Инициаторы считают, что такие покупки часто подменяют, злоупотребляют возвратами и в целом подобное решение «поможет продавцам сократить потери». Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤯57🤣20👍13🗿113

23 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈7,050 views59 reactionsread 24 September 2026

💳 Платить цифровыми рублями можно будет без интернета, ЦБ уже работает над этой возможностью, — Набиуллина. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣51🗿8

23 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC≈7,620 views151 reactionsread 24 September 2026

👀 В Некрасовке нашли пакет с трупом собаки. На ее теле множественные следы травм. Местные намерены выяснить, кто причастен к убийству, и требуют расследования. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤯99😱52

23 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈7,760 views60 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

🐈 В Химках «лисье ОПГ» уже наводит порядки и вступает в разборки с местными песелями. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

27😱20🤣13

23 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈8,100 views130 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

💳 Утильсбор повысят на 10–20%, — Минпромторг. Ведомство особенно отмечает, что благодаря этим налогам российский автопром достиг «важных результатов». Какой именно результат, кроме мема «Можно, а зачем?» — не уточняется 😐 Кроме того, утильсбор до 2000 рублей введут и на самолеты, дабы компенсировать лизинг и обслуживание «отечественных ласточек». Инициатива пока обсуждается. Ⓜ️Пульс Москвы

🤣70🗿27🤯196😱6👍1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 581 posts we hold for @mospulse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mospulse edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll1,210 voters approx.

Куда переносим столицу ?🤷‍♂️

  1. Оставляем как есть. Я здесь за эту Москву стою. Москва мне всё, и я всё Москве.32%
  2. Каждый год подбрасываем кубики и выбираем регион и город по числам. Метод синоптиков.18%
  3. На Марс. Границы России нигде не заканчиваются.15%
  4. город Братск, Иркутская область. Подойдет.9%
  5. У меня непереносимость столицы. Пойду к врачу.5%
  6. Туда, где котиков много 🐈22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 581 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пульс Москвы” (@mospulse), 152,269 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mospulse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.