Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for most.plastic Елена

Channel

most.plastic Елена

@most_plastic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,707subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001543494701
TypeChannel
Username@most_plastic
Created24 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/most_plastic

Growth

11,61411,70911,661.56 August 2026 — 11,616 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,614 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,614 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,621 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,631 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,626 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,624 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,620 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,665 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,688 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,697 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,706 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,709 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,707 subscribers11,7076 August 20263 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 28 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,600–11,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 15:1711,707-2
1 Sept 2026, 04:1711,709+6
31 Aug 2026, 03:1511,703-3
29 Aug 2026, 02:0411,706+9
28 Aug 2026, 02:2411,697+2
26 Aug 2026, 23:3411,695-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:2911,696+1
23 Aug 2026, 08:4311,695+7
21 Aug 2026, 19:4911,688+23
20 Aug 2026, 15:2811,665+38
19 Aug 2026, 15:5211,627+7
18 Aug 2026, 17:4311,620-4
17 Aug 2026, 19:4511,624-2
16 Aug 2026, 16:4511,626-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:1511,627-4
13 Aug 2026, 17:5811,631+4
12 Aug 2026, 19:4311,627+6
11 Aug 2026, 18:0311,621+7
10 Aug 2026, 19:1611,614-1
8 Aug 2026, 20:1811,615first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 11,707 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,450
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held24 (3 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total49,070
Reactions total1,659
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,817 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
81444.8%
🔥63334.8%
👍1357.43%
🙏754.13%
👏341.87%
❤‍🔥241.32%
💯201.10%
💔180.991%
🏆130.715%
🍌80.44%
👀70.385%
🥰70.385%
😍60.33%
😐60.33%
🤔40.22%
👎30.165%
😁30.165%
💘20.11%
🤩20.11%
🥴20.11%
1 further kind10.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 22 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @most_plastic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,210 views156 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥89🙏30💯2017

28 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,170 views128 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#барсегян #акцияфорум #омоложениелица Продолжаю делиться с Вами реабилитациями наших девочек с преображения. Наталья, комплекс по омоложению лица у Овсепа Барсегяна. Сейчас у нас чуть более двух месяцев прошло после операции. Что было выполнено: - Эндоскопический лифтинг верхних двух третей, - нижняя жиросохраняющая блефаропластика, - глубокий лифтинг лица и шеи, - передняя и боковая платизмопластика, - частичная

🔥8628🙏9😍3🥰2

25 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC≈2,770 views56 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

#подология #ортопедия #ноги Поговорили вчера про руки. А я ведь плотно занялась ногами! Была 2 раза у подолога в Митино (Топ-топ подология). Владелец-моя клиентка 😉 Сегодня была на консультации у травматолога-ортопеда. Конечно, нужна операция. А я выбрала стельки🫣🫣 Обсудим? Вы что выбираете? Кто сделал операцию на стопы? Расскажите, сложная реабилитация? Болело долго?

38👍13❤‍🔥4🥴1

25 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTCviews —

most.plastic Елена pinned «НАВИГАЦИЯ ПО КАНАЛУ Навигация содержит 4 основных раздела: пластика лица, пластика тела, врачи и косметологические процедуры + отдельно разные темы, касающиеся пластики, моих рекомендаций и советов, детей, болталки (листайте ниже, чтобы найти все разделы)…»

24 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,600 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#косметология #воробьева Воробьева Юлия врач-косметолог ИПХик. И мы с ней продолжаем работу. Сегодня у нас второй сеанс на аппарате PLADUO холодная плазма. Начали 1 мес назад. На третий сеанс подключим кое-что еще. Честно, пока не решили. Что вы делаете для кожи рук? Кстати, все помнят, как проходить щипковый тест на руки?😀 у меня целый пост на эту тему обсуждений😋

33🙏5

22 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈2,860 views127 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#личное На днях мой сын Саша привез мне из Италии сумку, которую я заказала за 15 минут. 🫣😀 Покупка спонтанная - примерка незамедлительная. В пижаме, как положено😋 Помню, что уже показывала вам свои сумки, вам откликнулось. Как вам эта красотка? Делитесь в комментариях своими любимицами, может кому-то очень не хватает новой хотелки в свой вишлист❤️

🔥90👍1916👏2

22 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC≈2,630 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#демин #проектвера #редукция Месяц назад Кате сделали операцию по уменьшению груди в нашем проекте помощи. Оперировал Сергей Анатольевич Демин. Доктор сурового нрава, но всем нашим девчонкам уже горячо полюбившийся😀 Помню себя в 11 лет с плоской грудью и в 14-15 уже с двумя ушами спаниеля. В то время как все мои подружки носили топики с титаником на голое тело я ходила в хб майках даже без лифчика и в футболках све

46🔥19👍10💘2🍌1

21 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,880 views170 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

#дудников #проектвера #омоложениелица 16 дней после комплекса по омоложению лица Наташи у Дудникова Алексея из клиники Грандмед. Фото у нас в макияже и без. На случай для тех, кто боится выходить в люди с синячками. Синяки все ещё со мной, не хотят меня покидать! Каждый день чем только не мажу, дарсонваль использую, самомассаж делаю, но фингалы и ныне там) Сегодня была какая-то секундная резкая боль под левой бров

🔥12923🏆13❤‍🔥3🤩2

20 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,180 views67 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Пояснительная бригада: Вот такой отвратительный и главное,-не имеющий ко мне отношения комментарий получил пост у Антона Анатольевича по проекту VERA. По нашему проекту помощи, ребята!🫣 Ну как же под постом о добром деле — и без порции говна? Форуму Plastic-Surgeon больше 20 лет, я владею им почти три. Сегодня форум еще больше изменился, это огромный открытый ресурс, где есть вся правда о хирургах: и прекрасные рез

56🙏11

19 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,300 views82 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @anatomiyasilueta_orlovPhoto

Проект «ВЕРА» В нашей, современной пластической хирургии есть внутренние порывы хирургов и бесплатные операции для людей, которые травмированы, которым тяжело, которые не могут никак оплатить операцию🤷🏻‍♂️ И больше это надо для хирургов, на самом деле, потому что это дает большое душевное удовлетворение🙏 Много лет я рука об руку работал с хирургом по имени Вера и в честь неё мы и назвали этот проект🫶 К сожалению, та

62🙏10🔥5👍3👏2

19 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,380 views24 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

#павлюк #ипхик #интимнаяпластика #увеличениечлена #подкаст Обещала рассказать вам о способе увеличения члена, который не приветствует Михаил Даниелович Павлюк, пластический хирург, заместитель генерального директора по медицинской деятельности ИПХиК. Самое время это сделать. Вижу, что тема зашла на многих ресурсах. А хирурги и косметологи как раз активно предлагают полимолочную кислоту как способ быстро и эффективн

👍13🔥4🍌32❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @most_plastic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@most_plastic edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анатомия Силуэта® Пластический хирург Орлов Антон, абдоминопластика, маммопластика, бодилифт
@anatomiyasilueta_orlov · 40,053
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
Из порося в карася
@imho_katerina · 42,406
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Пластическая хирургия БЕЗ цензуры
@plastikaBEZcenzyri · 34,935
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Доктор Карапетян. Пластический хирург
@drkarapetyan · 61,649
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Пластический хирург Николаева Сандара Афанасьевна
@drNikolaevaSandara · 89,677
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
Doctor.rust
@doctor_rust · 44,427
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“most.plastic Елена” (@most_plastic), 11,707 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/most_plastic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.