Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مستند

Channel

مستند

@mosttnad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

12,204subscribers

-977 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796617988
TypeChannel
Username@mosttnad
Created29 January 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mosttnad

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,20413,18912,696.58 August 2026 — 13,181 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,189 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,120 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,105 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,073 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,026 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,995 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,979 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,962 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,955 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,945 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,927 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,916 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,907 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,884 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,869 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,842 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,837 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,855 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,856 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,851 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,837 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,840 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,809 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,788 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,784 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,762 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,755 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,742 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,629 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,498 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,478 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,450 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,429 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,425 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,406 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,400 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,395 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,392 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,379 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,381 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,375 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,370 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,363 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,349 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,334 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,338 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,328 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,312 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,249 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,234 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,223 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,204 subscribers8 August 20263 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 86 days, net -977. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,056–13,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 00:5512,204-19
2 Nov 2026, 01:4812,223-11
1 Nov 2026, 04:0812,234-15
31 Oct 2026, 06:0612,249-63
30 Oct 2026, 07:5612,312-16
29 Oct 2026, 10:1612,328-10
28 Oct 2026, 11:2812,338+4
27 Oct 2026, 08:5612,334-15
26 Oct 2026, 05:3712,349-14
25 Oct 2026, 07:5612,363-7
24 Oct 2026, 09:2712,370-5
23 Oct 2026, 09:5012,375-6
22 Oct 2026, 10:0612,381+2
21 Oct 2026, 02:0712,379-13
19 Oct 2026, 22:3112,392-3
18 Oct 2026, 22:4512,395-5
17 Oct 2026, 20:3412,400-6
16 Oct 2026, 21:0612,406-19
15 Oct 2026, 17:4512,425-4
14 Oct 2026, 15:1012,429first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 29 January 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 12,204 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,000
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held5 (29 January 2023 – 30 October 2026)
Views total2,000
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,080 reactions across 4 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,04533.9%
👍54217.6%
🍌42513.8%
🥰2989.68%
💩2287.40%
👎1294.19%
🔥912.95%
👏902.92%
😁872.82%
🥴712.31%
💔632.05%
🖕110.357%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,080 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2023 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,000 views16 reactionsread 3 November 2026

کانال های فعالمون این ها هستن فعلا پست های به روز روتو این دوتا کانال میزاریم https://t.me/+Uhkt188wMl4yNzZk https://t.me/+fwlx9FIK8-81ZTU1 تو این کانال هم زیر نویس فارسی قرار میگیره https://t.me/+bD56lOOUMvJjZjJk اینجا هم فیلم های ترند و وایرال https://t.me/+YtVucAAPTotlMTQ0

❤13👎3

17 Jun 2026, 12:52 UTC≈45,000 views52 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤41🖕8👍1💩1🥰1

6 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC≈52,000 views107 reactionsread 3 November 2026

از اینجا لفت ندید 🆔 @Mosttnad

❤56👍46🖕3💩2

13 Apr 2024, 17:21 UTC≈450,000 views2,905 reactionsread 3 November 2026

تو پشتیبانی جوین باشید اگر مشکلی پیش اومد لینک کانال های جدید رو میزارم ممنون❤️

❤935👍495🍌425🥰297💩225👎126🔥91👏90

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @mosttnad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mosttnad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 November 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @mosttnad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مستند” (@mosttnad), 12,204 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mosttnad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.