Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MIW confessions ☠☢

Channel

MIW confessions ☠☢

@motionlesscf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002136056714
TypeChannel
Username@motionlesscf
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/motionlesscf

Growth

124127125.59 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers17 August 2026 — 126 subscribers31 August 2026 — 127 subscribers9 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 124–127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 09:13127+1
17 Aug 2026, 11:47126+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:00124no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:47124first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

122 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54654926603723929474839.3%
🎃2823.0%
custom 53392645550904563921814.8%
👻97.38%
custom 527160327239685085486.56%
custom 535290199537825282886.56%
👀32.46%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC60 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, отмечаем? Папа Джастин наконец-то заметил портрет, спустя множество моих попыток (где я только не продвигала его… даже его жена уже видела) Все вы помните тот портрет, сколько людей мне тогда помогало… Хочу сказать вам спасибо, я просто в детском восторге 🤩 🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄 [🌟]: БОЖЕ МЫ ДОЖДАЛИСЬ я за тебя так рада!!! 😭😭😭❤️ 🖤🖤 #тейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

👻9custom 53392645550904563928custom 54654926603723929474custom 52716032723968508542🎃1

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

28 Jul 2026, 23:52 UTC120 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

[🌟]: Короче мне подогнали сайт где можно со слезами на глазах выбирать любимые песни пока не узнаешь свою самую любимую давайте кидать результаты хз https://musiccup.app 🖤🖤 #адмтейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

🎃6custom 54654926603723929475

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

28 Jul 2026, 23:42 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я чекнула альбом пару дней назад и составила некое мнение Альбом в каком-то плане... > Сплав creatures и steotw Они пытались вытащить энергию дебютника и упаковать в продакшен стеотв, как я это вижу. Альбом заявлен как компиляция всего опыта группы и ностальгия по былому; есть куча отсылок и музыкальных, и лирических на их прошлый материал (понятно, что этого больше в металкорных треках, потому что синтвейва они не

custom 54654926603723929473🎃1custom 53392645550904563921custom 53529019953782528281

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

28 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC70 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я последний тейк писал в 2024 году лол ОБЗОР на новый альбом моей любимой группы мив. я наконец то добрался до этой прекрасной пластинки и вот мое мнение: Decades: трек достаточно тяжёлый, в принципе он работает как открывающий, но проблема в том что он ВООБЩЕ не запоминается, тут нет какого нибудь красивого припева, или чего то ещё, однако брейкдаун прикольный, 7/10 Log_in//Crash_Out: этот тречок понравился мне на

custom 53529019953782528284custom 54654926603723929474custom 52716032723968508542🎃1custom 53392645550904563921

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

28 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

привед мив кф, как вы познакомились с группой, и какую песню послушали первой??? 🖤🖤 #тейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

custom 54654926603723929472🎃1

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

25 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC89 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я так понимаю нам всем норм что это звучит 1 в 1 как сергей лазарев 🌟 || horrorwood_pines 🖤🖤 #тейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

🎃5custom 54654926603723929474custom 53392645550904563923custom 53529019953782528281

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

20 Jul 2026, 20:14 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

вечер добрый, я наконец-то добрался до прослушивания, так что держите отзыв decades она мне нравится и как песня, и как открывашка, ни на что конкретно не похожа из предыдущего, но наверное не часто буду пересушивать. или буду... она что-то из gravayard shift напоминает, не понимаю что. по тексту очень рад видеть отсылку на legacy (и на всё остальное тоже) 8-9/10 log_in//crash_out она мне нравится больше предыдущей,

custom 54654926603723929473

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

20 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC102 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

[🌟]: а тут есть те кому альбом зашел вообще? 🥹 аж обидно за него, прям единогласное "нет" такое 🖤🖤 #адмтейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

custom 54654926603723929473🎃2

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

20 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

этот альбом еще хуже, чем скоринг, у меня просто слов нет, одна хорошая песня и это сингл, просто бред 🖤🖤 #тейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

👀3🎃2custom 54654926603723929472

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

20 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC98 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

мне ниче не понравилось я ниченепонравилосюн ☹️ 🌟 || horrorwood_pines 🖤🖤 #тейк :: @miwcf_bot 🖤🖤

custom 54654926603723929474🎃3custom 52716032723968508542custom 53529019953782528281

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

19 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC103 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Знаю что немножко с опозданием, но делюсь своим фидбэком на decades(писанины будет много, извиняюсь заранее) Что тут сказать... Я ожидала большего. Крис говорил, что этот альбом планируется более "агрессивным" чем тот же, к примеру, стеотв, но как таковой агрессии я там не услышала. И ладно если не агрессивный, хотелось увидеть там хотя бы парочку душевных песен по типу Eternally yours или Another life, но по факту

custom 53392645550904563925custom 54654926603723929473custom 52716032723968508542🎃1custom 53529019953782528281

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

19 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

мнения мысли тейки?

🎃2custom 54654926603723929472

Signed ✞ 𝕲𝖍𝖔𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑 ✞

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @motionlesscf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MIW confessions ☠☢” (@motionlesscf), 127 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/motionlesscf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.