Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MUTE

Channel

MUTE

@moun_team

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,031subscribers

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348938020
TypeChannel
Username@moun_team
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/moun_team

Growth

11,99012,07912,034.57 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,075 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,079 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,067 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,059 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,062 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,048 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,041 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,037 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,022 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,023 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,015 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,002 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,001 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,996 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,992 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,995 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,998 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,990 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,993 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,995 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,038 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,045 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,049 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,036 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,031 subscribers12,0317 August 20268 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 32 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,977–12,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:1512,031-5
5 Sept 2026, 07:2012,036-13
3 Sept 2026, 08:1312,049+4
2 Sept 2026, 03:3312,045+7
1 Sept 2026, 00:4412,038+43
31 Aug 2026, 00:5511,995+2
30 Aug 2026, 02:5511,993+3
29 Aug 2026, 01:2811,990-8
28 Aug 2026, 00:1311,998+3
26 Aug 2026, 22:3811,995+3
26 Aug 2026, 01:4511,992-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:5811,996-5
23 Aug 2026, 23:4612,001-1
22 Aug 2026, 07:3912,002-13
20 Aug 2026, 19:4512,015-8
19 Aug 2026, 20:1212,023+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:3412,022-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:0612,026-11
16 Aug 2026, 16:3512,037-4
15 Aug 2026, 02:3312,041first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 12,031 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,680
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held47 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total125,120
Reactions total2,848
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,261 reactions across 47 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,98275.7%
👎75114.3%
🔥4909.31%
😁380.722%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 47 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moun_team. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,010 views57 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Кто собрал похожую на мою уже?)

52👎5

2 Sept 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,010 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Смотрю статистику, F30 скупили на всех самых активных серверах. Порядка 20 штук на каждом из серверов. И я тут конечно же есть. 4 id аккаунта) По Mazda ситуация хуже конечно. А вот на 20 и 21 сервере их почти скупили. Mazda есть Mazda, а BMW есть BMW, тут ничего не поделаешь. Топ 1 марка на проекте. Но статистика типичная для любой марки авто кроме BMW. Нужно это понимать. Навалите скринов, кто уже собрал их

35👎1

2 Sept 2026, 02:03 UTC≈3,340 views116 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Почему именно 21099? Лично для меня эта машина имеет большое значение. Я сам из небольшого города в Башкортостане, где отечественный автопром — это практически отдельная культура. С этими машинами я знаком с детства и одновременно их люблю и ненавижу :) В подростковом возрасте я постоянно возился с ними — в том числе потому, что по второй профессии я автомеханик. Мы, школьники и студенты, практически каждый вечер

104🔥6👎4😁2

1 Sept 2026, 20:06 UTC≈2,900 views60 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Кто купил новые авто, делитесь скринами На 21 все BMW раскупили

59👎1

1 Sept 2026, 19:37 UTC≈2,920 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026

По багам знаем : Винил на авентадоре Центр тяжести на авентадорах х3 Октавия каршеринг без текстур ЛяФеррари не открывается капот багажник Лисян дым из выхлопа Электро обьем батареи на всех электричках и гибридах Пишите еще, запишем Завтра патч выпустим

41👎1

1 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,980 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Вообще сканер я брал скорее ради нового опыта — разобраться в технологии на практике. Ну и главное: под масштабный ребилд одной «старушки», которую пока светить не хочу. Сначала полностью закончим с ней работу, а уже потом покажем результат. F30 отсканировали относительно недавно. Опыт получился реально интересный и полезный. Правда, нюансов тут хватает. Помимо самого процесса и долгой подготовки объекта под сканир

50👎1

1 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,770 views42 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ручную работу 3D-художника, его чувство формы и финальную полировку никакой прибор не заменит. Но сканер исключает гадание на кофейной гуще и повышает точность в разы. Помимо этого, мы ещё новички в сканировании но ясно одно - подготовка модели под сканирование занимает много времени и сканирование тоже не лёгкий процесс со своими нюансами. Сейчас мы как раз готовим для вас одну эксклюзивную по качеству модель. Это

39🔥2👎1

1 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,620 views58 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Помните, когда я ездил в гости к Жене? Тогда я взял у него 3D-сканер. Давайте сразу обозначим: в нашей работе нет волшебной кнопки «сделать красиво». Сканер — это не замена художнику, а мощный вспомогательный инструмент, как CAD-модели или чертежи. Скан дает высокоточный ориентир. Одно дело — моделировать «на глаз», пытаясь угадать сложную геометрию по фото, и совсем другое — работать, опираясь на реальные, детальн

54🔥3👎1

1 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,520 views96 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ваз 21099 У Приз с ивента приуроченного к 1 сентября. Подробные скриншоты и описание Бпан занижение, снятый бампер, новое крыло, ушатанное правое крыло, отсутствие элементов кузова, лампочки которые свисают на проводочках, номерной знак прикреплённый к под дворник,шеснарь под капотом, новое чёрное водительское крыло с ещё заводской наклейкой. Наклейки "4к", "Села Лада" (НЕ ПУТАТЬ) - которую не видно под опущенным с

91😁3👎2

31 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,270 views64 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Очень много лайков собрала в дс. Не м3г80 но одна из самых топ позиций

60👎4

30 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,760 views78 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

73😁3👎2

28 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈3,490 views86 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Так а это что? я не понял

84👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @moun_team. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Old Team News
@old_team_news · 29,683
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 September 2026
HASSLE Online
@hassleonline · 215,931
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MUTE” (@moun_team), 12,031 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moun_team.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.