Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for R21+ Entertainment & Movie

Channel

R21+ Entertainment & Movie

@movieontelegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

17,878subscribers

+1,588 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001117559101
TypeChannel
Username@movieontelegram
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/movieontelegram

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,19217,93617,0646 August 2026 — 16,290 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,290 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,287 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,276 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,255 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,236 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,226 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,216 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,192 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,711 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,794 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,819 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,882 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,866 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,098 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,078 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,045 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,035 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,052 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,221 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,230 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,211 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,189 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,250 subscribers7 September 2026 — 17,609 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,927 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,921 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,936 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,916 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,878 subscribers17,8786 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,588. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,930–18,198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1517,878-38
15 Sept 2026, 21:0017,916-20
14 Sept 2026, 07:0017,936+15
12 Sept 2026, 17:2117,921-6
10 Sept 2026, 15:0017,927+318
7 Sept 2026, 08:4217,609+359
4 Sept 2026, 16:1517,250+61
3 Sept 2026, 01:0217,189-22
1 Sept 2026, 23:0417,211-19
1 Sept 2026, 01:4517,230+9
31 Aug 2026, 01:2417,221+169
30 Aug 2026, 04:2317,052+17
29 Aug 2026, 06:5717,035-10
28 Aug 2026, 05:1417,045-17
27 Aug 2026, 06:2717,062-16
26 Aug 2026, 03:2417,078-20
25 Aug 2026, 00:2217,098+226
23 Aug 2026, 10:1916,872+6
21 Aug 2026, 20:1516,866-16
20 Aug 2026, 20:1416,882first reading

Engagement

356 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.887%
avg views ÷ 17,878 subscribers
Avg views / post
159
103 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.445%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
103
of 356 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 103 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held356 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total16,328
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 44m
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 97 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1588.2%
👍15.88%
🥰15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 356 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 356 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTC43 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

二十多年後再看,《機械公敵》最讓人不安的地方,已經不是那些會奔跑、會戰鬥的機器人。 而是電影裡那個世界,開始離我們沒有那麼遠。 當年我們害怕的是: 機器會不會變得像人? 現在真正需要思考的,可能是: 當機器越來越懂人類,我們還能不能清楚分辨,哪些決定應該交給它,哪些必須留在人類自己手裡。 所以《機械公敵》最後留下的,不是一場人類與機器的戰爭。 而是一個二十年前看似遙遠,今天卻越來越接近的問題: 如果有一天,一台機器真的比我們更懂如何保護人類, 我們還願不願意讓它決定什麼才叫「保護」?

3 Sept 2026, 07:08 UTC43 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @r216n9Video

小时候以为是36计 长大了才知道是唱36D!! https://t.me/r216n9/192

3 Sept 2026, 04:41 UTC65 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @r21vvip2Photo

高颜值女友,女仆装小母狗按在地毯上从后方狠狠插入湿润骚穴,大力抽插,身体不停颤抖直至喷水高潮 视频在这里 👈🏻

3 Sept 2026, 03:13 UTC84 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @tipsclubVideo

功夫女足7号妍姝,电影里看到的都是真的! https://t.me/tipsclub/2737

3 Sept 2026, 03:01 UTC77 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @r21meirenV4Video

一会儿就删掉哦!⁰ https://t.me/r21meirenV4/169

3 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC98 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

【刺客聶隱娘】 由台灣名導侯孝賢執導、舒淇與張震領銜主演的《刺客聶隱娘》(英語:The Assassin),是 2015 年上映的經典東方武俠電影。 本片改編自唐代作家裴鉶的傳奇小說《聶隱娘》,是侯孝賢導演在 2023 年因失智症宣布退休前的最後一部長片代表作。 電影以極具詩意的東方美學著稱,捨棄了傳統武俠片的大量對白與快節奏打鬥,改以極致的長鏡頭、遠景山水與留白,營造出盛唐的孤獨氛圍與歷史張力。

2 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC183 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

在周星驰的大师光环之下,《功夫女足》虽然至今票房收据仍在25亿人民币左右,只算是近两年票房比较出众但却无法晋身中国影史最佳票房榜之作,但无可疑问的却是全球华人观众最触目之作。 // 笔者认为这部电影会成为观众焦点,其实是拆射出观众心中对周星驰的情意结,及对香港电影盛世的缅怀。 香港电影沦落已无复当年勇多年,任何一位过去曾叱咤风云的超级巨星,包括成龙、周润发甚至是周星驰本身等的时代已过,也是无可争的事实。在电影业蓬勃的时代,红星们可以连续不断地推出他们主演的影片,当年双“周”的全盛期,大家各自每年有三四部新片上映是司空见惯之事。到后来市道衰退,逼于无法而大量减产,这已经是一个时代结束的明证。 ࿓ ࿓ ࿓ ​

2 Sept 2026, 16:33 UTC113 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @r21plusmovieVideo

🎬男人放了女领导鸽子,结果惨遭领导疯狂报复 😂😂😂 #娜剧场 #搞笑 https://t.me/r21plusmovie/3455

2 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC155 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

劉兆銘辭世 享壽94歲 資深藝人劉兆銘今日傳出離世消息,終年94歲。藝人丁羽證實噩耗,指劉兆銘於傍晚6時安詳離去。 老妖怪令我好記得佢 劉兆銘在演藝界耕耘逾半世紀,貢獻良多——他不但是首位為法國舞蹈家編舞的華人,地位舉足輕重;晚年雖長期受病魔困擾,前年更在醫院中度生日,仍不減業界對其敬重,亦提攜無數後進,幕前幕後同受尊崇。

2 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC103 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @r21sportVideo

多运动,多骑马 https://t.me/r21sport/186

Showing the 12 most recent of 356 posts we hold for @movieontelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“R21+ Entertainment & Movie” (@movieontelegram), 17,878 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/movieontelegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.