Channel
@mozhno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,159subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001120016235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mozhno |
| Created | 9 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mozhno |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:34 | 17,159 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 17,166 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 17,170 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 17,174 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 17,178 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 17,179 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 17,182 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 17,184 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 17,188 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 17,186 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 17,184 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 17,185 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 17,182 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 17,190 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 17,192 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 17,193 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 17,196 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 17,201 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 17,200 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 17,204 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,004 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2,004 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,004 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Нехватка Типографическая игра с недостающими фрагментами букв: то чувство, когда нехватка чего-то — не недостаток и не преграда, а приём, усиливающий красоту и послание. Источник: личные фото, подсмотрено в Питере в арке на улице Мира, 10 (автор тут) #типографика
🔥135
Стрелки-сноски Приятный и непривычный приём в верстке книжных сносок: вместо цифр — стрелочки, указывающие направление сноски на полях. Думаю, не подойдет для худлита, но для небольших сносок в нонфикшене — почему бы и нет. За наводку спасибо табличному дизайну. #типографика Источник
🔥170
Копатель Ещё одна прикольная типографическая игра: постер фильма Digger. Название превратилось в человека с лопатой, где буквы стали головой, шеей, телом и ногами. Старомодно, красиво и изобретательно. Источник #типографика
🔥129
Река Роскошный территориальный брендинг: в русле реки Амазонки дизайнеры увидели формы букв. За наводку спасибо @Vohan_dsgn Источник #типографика
🔥202
Динамический текст Любопытный типографический приём из новой тайпскрипт-библиотеки: текст динамически подстраивается и пересчитывается без DOM и CSS. Техническое новшество в библиотеке открывает возможность по-новому поиграться со шрифтами. Не сильно верю, что это пригодится утилитарным сервисам, но, возможно, мы увидим интересные зрелищные приёмы на промо-сайтах. Источник #ui #типографика
🔥184
Скошенные буквы Очень простой заголовочный прием для презентаций или моушна: сделать одну или несколько символов скошенными. Получается легко, разнообразно и универсально. Источник #типографика
🔥132
Разряды чисел В старославянском языке для записи чисел использовались буквы, а чтобы отличить контекст использования, добавлялся декор. Для больших чисел — например, 10 000 (тьма) или 100 000 (легион) — существовала отдельная система: буквы помещались в условные рамки круглой или квадратной формы (см. первый скрин). Кстати, шрифт на этом и следующих скринах сам по себе достоин упоминания: это Zhivov, уникальный эксп…
🔥134
Точка Напряжённый и ритмичный логотип бренда бумаги с простым и красивым приёмом: точка поднимается вверх по лесенке. Чистая игра с формой: дизайнер разглядел в буквах движение вверх. Источник #бренд
🔥177
Упаковка из чужой сферы Коллаба с рискованным приемом «позаимствовать стандарт из радикально иной отрасли». Для кофейных дрипов сделали упаковку как для краски, да ещё и с цветом, который далек и от кофе, и от ассоциаций с едой. Вроде вообще не вызывает пищевого интереса, а смотрится круто, свежо, и хочется такой штукой обладать. Особенно вживую понравилось, как на полках все это выкладывается штабелями (см. последне…
🔥156
Игра с формой привычного Классный концепт с необычной формой стеклоблоков: интерьеру булочной — стеклоблоки-булки (или леденцы, кому как больше нравится). Источник #форма
🔥259
Магия света Тоггл в каталоге светильников затемняет сайт и «включает» свет. Замечательная продуктовая фича: и с опорой на ключевой сценарий, и полезная, и красивая, просто комбо. За наводку спасибо @annaplate Источник #ui
🔥326
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mozhno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 437,334 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Визуальные приёмы” (@mozhno), 17,159 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mozhno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.