Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Молодежная палата при МГД

Channel

Молодежная палата при МГД

@mpmgd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

851subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002829940159
TypeChannel
Username@mpmgd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mpmgd

Growth

8318518416 August 2026 — 831 subscribers6 August 2026 — 831 subscribers13 August 2026 — 837 subscribers20 August 2026 — 840 subscribers28 August 2026 — 851 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 828–854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 02:35851+11
20 Aug 2026, 19:12840+3
13 Aug 2026, 12:57837+6
6 Aug 2026, 15:07831no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:32831first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
298.5%
avg views ÷ 851 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (3 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,540
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

317 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11636.6%
🔥7824.6%
❤‍🔥3410.7%
👏3410.7%
👍319.78%
🥰92.84%
😍82.52%
🤝72.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈2,540 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❗️❗️ Почему зумеры не ходят или ходят на выборы? 🤨 Думаем, что не только мы задаемся этим вопросом и именно поэтому приглашаем вас принять участие в исследовании. ❗️Может быть именно ваш ответ станет отправной точкой положительных изменений в электоральной системе. Ссылка тут (отправь пост 5 друзьям и завтра у тебя будет счастливый день!)

19👏14🔥13❤‍🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC405 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

✍️ Мы на «Радио Сенеж» — и рассказали о главном! Пока на «Территории смыслов» кипит жизнь, наш секретарь, София Глассон поехала на форум от делегации Молодежной палаты при МГД и выступила в прямом эфире «Радио Сенеж» и рассказала о Молодежной палате при МГД. Говорили о том, как устроена палата, какие проекты мы реализуем, как молодежь может влиять на жизнь города и почему наша работа — это не просто строчка в резюм

🔥1412👏7😍3❤‍🔥1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC253 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✍️ Наш вопрос — Пескову и интервью — на «России 1» 🐭Руководитель секции по спорту и молодежной политике Молодежной палаты при МГД, Данила Морозов на форуме «Территория смыслов» задал вопрос пресс-секретарю Президента Дмитрию Сергеевичу Пескову, а затем дал интервью телеканалу «Россия-1». Данила спросил: «Какую роль молодежь может сыграть в борьбе с недостоверной информацией и какие медиапроекты сегодня наиболее вост

❤‍🔥19🔥1817👍3😍3🤝2

31 Jul 2026, 18:15 UTC324 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✍️«Территория смыслов» - итоги С 26 по 30 июля в Мастерской управления «Сенеж» проходила смена «Правда» XII Всероссийского молодёжного образовательного форума «Территория смыслов». Главная тема - выборы в Государственную Думу 2026 года и укрепление суверенитета страны. На форуме встретились молодые политики, политологи, активисты молодежных объединений — представители всех партий. ❗️Основное, что запомнилось: несм

16👍10🔥9😍2

27 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC400 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🤏Немного о форуме В Мастерской управления «Сенеж» собрались молодые политики, политологи и представители молодёжных объединений со всей страны. Ключевая тема — выборы-2026 и подготовка нового поколения лидеров. 🐭В программе: встречи с ведущими управленцами, открытые диалоги и деловая игра, где каждый проживёт все этапы избирательного процесса. ✅Заметку с ключевыми итогами обязательно пришлем!

10🔥9👏6🥰2

27 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC421 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

14👍8👏5

3 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC547 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Сколько москвичей записалось в народное ополчение в 1941 году?

  1. 80 тыс.7%
  2. 120 тыс.20%
  3. 160 тыс.28%
  4. 300 тыс.45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4🔥3🤝3

3 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC475 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Какой процент ополченцев составляли люди с высшим и средним образованием?

  1. 10-1521%
  2. 25-3023%
  3. 35-4027%
  4. 50-6029%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4🔥3🤝2

3 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC442 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Сколько дивизий народного ополчения было сформировано в Москве в июле 1941 года?

  1. 817%
  2. 1235%
  3. 1629%
  4. 2520%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6🔥4🥰3

3 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC410 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

В каком году Московская городская Дума установила День Московского народного ополчения?

  1. 201534%
  2. 201826%
  3. 202121%
  4. 202219%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6🔥5🥰4👍1

3 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC359 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥118👍8👏2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mpmgd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz75 voters

Сколько москвичей записалось в народное ополчение в 1941 году?

  1. 80 тыс.7%
  2. 120 тыс.20%
  3. 160 тыс.28%
  4. 300 тыс.45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

Какой процент ополченцев составляли люди с высшим и средним образованием?

  1. 10-1521%
  2. 25-3023%
  3. 35-4027%
  4. 50-6029%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz66 voters

Сколько дивизий народного ополчения было сформировано в Москве в июле 1941 года?

  1. 817%
  2. 1235%
  3. 1629%
  4. 2520%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

В каком году Московская городская Дума установила День Московского народного ополчения?

  1. 201534%
  2. 201826%
  3. 202121%
  4. 202219%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Молодежная палата при МГД” (@mpmgd), 851 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mpmgd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.