6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 599–607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 01:20
600
-1
8 Sept 2026, 07:15
601
-4
22 Aug 2026, 15:34
605
-1
14 Aug 2026, 14:29
606
+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:42
605
+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:15
604
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
59 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25
42.4%
👍
17
28.8%
👏
11
18.6%
🙏
3
5.08%
🔥
2
3.39%
🥰
1
1.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Голосуй за Прикамье в окружном конкурсе уличного искусства!
Пермский край на конкурсе «ФормАрт» представляет работа Марии Нестеркиной «Связь поколений» – мурал в Лысьве, на котором изображен теплый, домашний сюжет про уральские традиции: бабушка с внуком за лепкой пельменей.
«ФормАрт» – это проект, который объединяет молодых художников и меняет наши города, делая их уютнее. Главная тема в этот раз связана с Годом е…
Рейтинг членов краевого Молодежного парламента
Первая половина 2026 года позади и пришло время подвести итоги работы седьмого состава Молодежного парламента Пермского края за этот период.
При оценивании эффективности работы членов регионального Молодежного парламента учитывалась:
✅ законотворческая деятельность
✅ реализация проектов Молодежного парламента и участие в событиях Законодательного Собрания
✅ совместная …
Молодежный парламент встретился с молодежным советом «Метафракса»
Активистам молодежного совета предприятия рассказали о молодежном парламентском движении. Участники также обсудили мероприятия для работающей молодежи региона и возможности грантовых конкурсов для реализации проектов.
Помимо рабочей встречи для членов Молодежного парламента была организована экскурсия на производство «Метафракс Кемикалс». Молодые пар…
Молодежный парламент подключился к ликвидации последствий разлива нефтепродуктов
Молодые парламентарии Прикамья Кирилл Попов, Валентин Пантелеев и Анна Елисеева помогли в очистке берега реки Мулянка, который загрязнен из‑за разлива нефтепродуктов.
За неделю к помощи подключились ведущие молодежные общественные организации региона. Вместе со специалистами аварийно‑спасательных служб и представителями профильных ведо…
❤6👍3👏2🙏1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @mpzspk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дмитрий Махонин @mahonin59 · 28,638 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Пермский глобус @permskiykanal · 42,119 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Молодежный парламент Пермского края” (@mpzspk), 600 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mpzspk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.