Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LINKS (MRPTECH)

Channel

LINKS (MRPTECH)

@mrptechlinks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,512subscribers

-56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001958180300
TypeChannel
Username@mrptechlinks
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrptechlinks

Growth

2,5122,5802,5467 August 2026 — 2,568 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,559 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,580 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,569 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,563 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,557 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,553 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,547 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,538 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,526 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,512 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,502–2,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 18:372,512-14
4 Sept 2026, 14:002,526-12
1 Sept 2026, 02:272,538-9
29 Aug 2026, 00:512,547-6
25 Aug 2026, 23:342,553-4
23 Aug 2026, 09:112,557-6
20 Aug 2026, 04:382,563-6
16 Aug 2026, 21:362,569-11
13 Aug 2026, 16:072,580+21
10 Aug 2026, 06:442,559-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:032,568no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:522,568first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 5 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC329 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Example: https://www.foregate.com/en-US/event/439540257252185933? For this event, AST seems to have a good chance of winning, according to AI analysis

28 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC322 viewsread 7 August 2026

Here is a detailed version: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W-14Pp51ejeYxlirN3dXMa83WBa_7Twr/view?usp=sharing

28 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC330 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤖 How some users follow our AI: - Consider sides where AI win rate is 80%+ - Prefer matches where the odds/price are close (like 50/50 or 60/40) but AI clearly favors one side - Treat super low‑probability, high payout underdogs as small entertainment bets, not all‑in These are just references, not financial advice – always control your size. 💸

28 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC317 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧠 New to ForeGate? Here are 3 quick tips before you place any order: 1️⃣ Price ≈ win probability ‑ 0.8 ≈ 80% win chance, 0.2 ≈ 20%. ‑ Low price + very high “To Win” usually means a big underdog, not “cheap”. 2️⃣ Avg Price & To Win ‑ Avg Price = your average buy price. ‑ To Win = total amount you get if you’re right (stake + profit). Don’t just chase the highest To Win. Check the win chance behind it. 3️⃣ Use AI as

12 Apr 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 7 August 2026

Subject: URGENT: Follow-up regarding Ticket #956734 | Account: [email protected] Dear Support Team, I am writing to follow up on Ticket #956734 regarding the account associated with [email protected] The account holder is a well-known public figure with a significant community following, and this situation is being closely monitored by a large audience. Despite providing all necessary documentation and expl

19 Dec 2025, 06:53 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 7 August 2026

What is one key benefit of OPN Chain's instant finality? - Transactions are confirmed and irreversible almost immediately Which SDK is OPN Chain built on? - Cosmos SDK What type of blockchain is OPN Chain? - Layer-1 blockchain What popular programming language can developers use to build on OPN Chain? - Solidity What does EVM-compatible mean for developers? - They can use Ethereum tools and Solidity Which IOPn p

12 Dec 2025, 12:13 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

✨ Surf Ai Auto Chat Script By MRPTech 👉 git clone https://github.com/mosibur1/surfai.git 👉 cd surfai 👉 npm install 👉 nano account.json 👉 nano proxy.txt 👉 npm start

12 Oct 2025, 10:23 UTC≈2,840 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡ Sosovalue Season 2 Airdrop Script Commands git clone https://github.com/mosibur1/sosovalue.git cd sosovalue npm install nano data/proxy.txt nano data/comments.txt nano data/refreshToken.txt node main

28 Sept 2025, 15:47 UTC≈2,910 viewsread 7 August 2026

Update Aztec Nodes Version 2.0.3 New update in network-testnet CLI Method 1. Go to Screen screen -r aztec 2. Stop Node Press CTRL+C 3. Update Aztec Nodes aztec-up 2.0.3 4. Re-run Aztec Nodes aztec start --node --archiver --sequencer \ --network testnet \ --l1-rpc-urls RPC_URL \ --l1-consensus-host-urls BEACON_URL \ --sequencer.validatorPrivateKeys 0xPK1,0xPK2,etc \ --sequencer.publisherPrivateKey 0xYourP

14 Sept 2025, 09:43 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🍀 PI NETWORK BREAKS OUT – PRICE TOWARDS $0.45, WILL “PI SEASON” COME? 🗓 On September 13, Pi Network released testnet v20, confirming an important step on the road to Mainnet. Immediately after the update, Pi price increased by 3%, reaching $0.37 - $0.39 and is forming a familiar “breakout” pattern. ✏️ Highlights: — Chart of explosive signals: Pi has created a solid foundation around $0.34. If it breaks $0.39, the n

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mrptechlinks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LINKS (MRPTECH)” (@mrptechlinks), 2,512 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrptechlinks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.